Robert Collins wrote:
On 16 December 2013 23:56, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
I like the first and third parts. Not really convinced with the second
part, though. You'll have a lot of Confirmed bugs without proposed
approach (like 99% of them) so asking core to read them all and
On 16 December 2013 23:56, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BugTriage is a 10 step process: thats
not something we can sensible do over coffee in the morning.
Totally agree with that. The idea of those 10 steps was not meant as
On 13/12/13 19:13, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
Confirmed The bug was reproduced or confirmed as a genuine bug
Triaged The bug comments contain a full analysis on how to properly
fix the issue
From wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Bugs
Putting aside the difficulty of complete
Robert Collins wrote:
Confirmed The bug was reproduced or confirmed as a genuine bug
Triaged The bug comments contain a full analysis on how to properly
fix the issue
From wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Bugs
Putting aside the difficulty of complete reproduction sometimes, I
don't understand
On 12/12/2013 04:46 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to overhaul the bug triage process for nova (initially)
to make it much lighter and more effective.
I'll be sending a more comprehensive mail shortly
before you do, let's agree what we're trying to solve. Perhaps you were
going to
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
Hi, I'm trying to overhaul the bug triage process for nova (initially)
to make it much lighter and more effective.
I'll be sending a more comprehensive mail shortly but one thing that
has been giving me pause is
