Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:51:36AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Zaro wrote: > > We want to let everyone know that there is a big UI change in Gerrit > > 2.11. The change screen (CS), which is the main view for a patchset, > > has been completely replaced with a new change screen (CS2). While >

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

On 2015-10-21 10:18:31 -0400 (-0400), Anita Kuno wrote: [...] > If folks are willing to help build Gerrit v3, that is wonderful. > If you would like to talk to Khai on how to get started > contributing to Gerrit, I'm going out on a limb here and will > guess he will be supportive of your efforts.

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

r usage questions)" >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> >> Date: 10/21/2015 11:42 AM >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11 >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:08:29PM -0700, Zaro wrote: >>> Hello All, >>> >>> The

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

> Date: 10/21/2015 11:42 AM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11 > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:08:29PM -0700, Zaro wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > The openstack-infra team would like to upgrade from our Gerrit 2.8 to > > Gerrit 2.11. We are

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:08:29PM -0700, Zaro wrote: > Hello All, > > The openstack-infra team would like to upgrade from our Gerrit 2.8 to > Gerrit 2.11. We are proposing to do the upgrade shortly after the > Mitaka summit. The main motivation behind the upgrade is to allow us > to take

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

Alexis Lee <lx...@hpe.com> wrote on 10/20/2015 03:13:20 PM: > From: Alexis Lee <lx...@hpe.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: 10/20/2015 03:19 PM > Subject: Re: [op

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

Markus Zoeller said on Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 03:33:37PM +0200: > > >Would it be possible to create a "prio" label to help sorting out > stuff? +1 to this! > > I guess topics could be used but those are overwritten on every new > > PS. > > The topics survive a new patch set, as far as I observed

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

On 15/10/15 17:42 +0200, Markus Zoeller wrote: Zaro wrote: We are soliciting feedback so please let us know what you think. For spotting possible trivial bug fixes the new query option "delta" will be useful. For example: "status:open delta:<100" Would it be possible to create a "prio" label

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

On 10/15/2015 11:36 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > >On 15/10/15 17:42 +0200, Markus Zoeller wrote: > >For spotting possible trivial bug fixes the new query option "delta" > >will be useful. For example: "status:open delta:<100" > > > >Would it be possible to create a "prio" label to help sorting out

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

On 10/14/2015 08:22 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: > On 10/14/2015 11:08 AM, Zaro wrote: >> We are soliciting feedback so please let us know what you think. > > Since you asked :) > > Mostly it's just different which is fine. Two things I noticed when > playing around, shown in [1] > > When reviewing,

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

Zaro wrote: > We are soliciting feedback so please let us know what you think. For spotting possible trivial bug fixes the new query option "delta" will be useful. For example: "status:open delta:<100" Would it be possible to create a "prio" label to help sorting out stuff? If I understand [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

I would love to see this! It would really help review priorities and could easily be worked into review dashboards. --John On 15 Oct 2015, at 8:42, Markus Zoeller wrote: > Zaro wrote: >> We are soliciting feedback so please let us know what you think. > > For spotting possible trivial bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:08 AM Zaro wrote: > Hello All, > > The openstack-infra team would like to upgrade from our Gerrit 2.8 to > Gerrit 2.11. We are proposing to do the upgrade shortly after the > Mitaka summit. The main motivation behind the upgrade is to allow us > to

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

Thanks for the suggestion Markus. I think the path for those types of suggestions would be thru a spec: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack-infra/infra-specs/ Thanks for reporting these Yuriy. I've created a checklist[1] to track things to verify before we actually do anything. I think at

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

Zaro wrote: > We want to let everyone know that there is a big UI change in Gerrit > 2.11. The change screen (CS), which is the main view for a patchset, > has been completely replaced with a new change screen (CS2). While > Gerrit 2.8 contains both old CS and CS2, I believe everyone in >

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

On 10/13/2015 08:08 PM, Zaro wrote: > Hello All, > > The openstack-infra team would like to upgrade from our Gerrit 2.8 to > Gerrit 2.11. We are proposing to do the upgrade shortly after the > Mitaka summit. The main motivation behind the upgrade is to allow us > to take advantage of some of

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

On 13/10/15 17:08 -0700, Zaro wrote: Hello All, The openstack-infra team would like to upgrade from our Gerrit 2.8 to Gerrit 2.11. We are proposing to do the upgrade shortly after the Mitaka summit. The main motivation behind the upgrade is to allow us to take advantage of some of the new

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

On 10/14/2015 11:08 AM, Zaro wrote: We are soliciting feedback so please let us know what you think. Since you asked :) Mostly it's just different which is fine. Two things I noticed when playing around, shown in [1] When reviewing, the order "-1 0 +1" is kind of counter-intuitive to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:08:29PM -0700, Zaro wrote: > Hello All, > > The openstack-infra team would like to upgrade from our Gerrit 2.8 to > Gerrit 2.11. We are proposing to do the upgrade shortly after the > Mitaka summit. The main motivation behind the upgrade is to allow us > to take

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/14/2015 07:07 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:08:29PM -0700, Zaro wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> The openstack-infra team would like to upgrade from our Gerrit >> 2.8 to Gerrit 2.11. We are proposing to do the upgrade shortly

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

> On 14 Oct 2015, at 02:08, Zaro wrote: > > Hello All, > > The openstack-infra team would like to upgrade from our Gerrit 2.8 to > Gerrit 2.11. We are proposing to do the upgrade shortly after the > Mitaka summit. The main motivation behind the upgrade is to allow us > to

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:51 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > My main issue with CS2 is how greedy it is in horizontal space, mostly > due to the waste of space in the "Related changes" panel. If there are > related changes, the owner/reviewer/voting panel is cramped in the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

On 10/14/2015 07:57 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> On 14 Oct 2015, at 02:08, Zaro wrote: >> >> Hello All, >> >> The openstack-infra team would like to upgrade from our Gerrit 2.8 to >> Gerrit 2.11. We are proposing to do the upgrade shortly after the >> Mitaka summit. The

[openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

Hello All, The openstack-infra team would like to upgrade from our Gerrit 2.8 to Gerrit 2.11. We are proposing to do the upgrade shortly after the Mitaka summit. The main motivation behind the upgrade is to allow us to take advantage of some of the new REST api, ssh commands, and stream events