Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Morgan Fainberg's message of 2016-05-03 11:13:38 -0700: > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Monty Taylor > wrote: > > > > > On 05/03/2016 11:47 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > > > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Morgan Fainberg's message of 2016-05-03 11:13:38 -0700: > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Monty Taylor > wrote: > > > > > On 05/03/2016 11:47 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > > > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

Excerpts from Morgan Fainberg's message of 2016-05-03 11:13:38 -0700: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > > On 05/03/2016 11:47 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > >> Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2016-05-03 07:59:21 -0700: > >> > >>> On 05/03/2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 05/03/2016 11:47 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > >> Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2016-05-03 07:59:21 -0700: >> >>> On 05/03/2016 08:55 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: >>> Perhaps we have different perspectives.

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

On 05/03/2016 11:47 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2016-05-03 07:59:21 -0700: On 05/03/2016 08:55 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Perhaps we have different perspectives. How is accepting what we previously emitted and told the user would be valid sneaky or wrong? Sounds

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2016-05-03 07:21:52 -0700: > On 05/03/2016 09:55 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > When the operator has configured a new token format to emit, they should > > also be able to allow any previously emitted formats to be validated to > > allow users a smooth transition

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

Excerpts from Lance Bragstad's message of 2016-05-03 07:42:43 -0700: > If we were to write a uuid/fernet hybrid provider, it would only be > expected to support something like stable/liberty to stable/mitaka, right? > This is something that we could contribute to stackforge, too. > If done the

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2016-05-03 07:59:21 -0700: > On 05/03/2016 08:55 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > > Perhaps we have different perspectives. How is accepting what we > > previously emitted and told the user would be valid sneaky or wrong? > > Sounds like common sense due

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

On 05/03/2016 08:55 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Steve Martinelli's message of 2016-05-02 19:56:15 -0700: Comments inline... On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Matt Fischer wrote: On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Hello! I

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

If we were to write a uuid/fernet hybrid provider, it would only be expected to support something like stable/liberty to stable/mitaka, right? This is something that we could contribute to stackforge, too. On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Adam Young wrote: > On 05/03/2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

On 05/03/2016 09:55 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Steve Martinelli's message of 2016-05-02 19:56:15 -0700: Comments inline... On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Matt Fischer wrote: On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Hello! I

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

Excerpts from Steve Martinelli's message of 2016-05-02 19:56:15 -0700: > Comments inline... > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Matt Fischer wrote: > > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > >> Hello! I enjoyed very much listening in

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Hello! I enjoyed very much listening in on the default token provider > work session last week in Austin, so thanks everyone for participating > in that. I did not speak up then, because I wasn't really sure of this > idea

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

Excerpts from Matt Fischer's message of 2016-05-02 16:39:02 -0700: > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > Hello! I enjoyed very much listening in on the default token provider > > work session last week in Austin, so thanks everyone for participating > > in

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

Comments inline... On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Matt Fischer wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > >> Hello! I enjoyed very much listening in on the default token provider >> work session last week in Austin, so thanks everyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Hello! I enjoyed very much listening in on the default token provider > work session last week in Austin, so thanks everyone for participating > in that. I did not speak up then, because I wasn't really sure of this > idea

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Token providers and Fernet as the default

Hello! I enjoyed very much listening in on the default token provider work session last week in Austin, so thanks everyone for participating in that. I did not speak up then, because I wasn't really sure of this idea that has been bouncing around in my head, but now I think it's the case and we