Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] next min libvirt?

2016-05-03 Thread Thomas Bechtold
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:08:06AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 10:28:23AM -0500, Thomas Bechtold wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:13:42AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > > > We've just landed the libvirt min to bump us up to 1.2.1 required. It's > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] next min libvirt?

2016-05-03 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 10:28:23AM -0500, Thomas Bechtold wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:13:42AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > > We've just landed the libvirt min to bump us up to 1.2.1 required. It's > > probably a good time consider the appropriate bump for Otaca. > > > > By that

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] next min libvirt?

2016-05-03 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 03:16:56PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/29/2016 10:28 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:13:42AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > >>We've just landed the libvirt min to bump us up to 1.2.1 required. It's > >>probably a good time consider the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] next min libvirt?

2016-04-30 Thread Thomas Bechtold
Hi, On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:13:42AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > We've just landed the libvirt min to bump us up to 1.2.1 required. It's > probably a good time consider the appropriate bump for Otaca. > > By that time our Ubuntu LTS will be 16.04 (libvirt 1.3.1), RHEL 7.1 > (1.2.8).

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] next min libvirt?

2016-04-29 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/29/2016 10:28 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:13:42AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: We've just landed the libvirt min to bump us up to 1.2.1 required. It's probably a good time consider the appropriate bump for Otaca. By that time our Ubuntu LTS will be 16.04 (libvirt

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] next min libvirt?

2016-04-29 Thread Sean Dague
On 04/29/2016 10:28 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:13:42AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: >> We've just landed the libvirt min to bump us up to 1.2.1 required. It's >> probably a good time consider the appropriate bump for Otaca. >> >> By that time our Ubuntu LTS will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] next min libvirt?

2016-04-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:13:42AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > We've just landed the libvirt min to bump us up to 1.2.1 required. It's > probably a good time consider the appropriate bump for Otaca. > > By that time our Ubuntu LTS will be 16.04 (libvirt 1.3.1), RHEL 7.1 > (1.2.8). Additionally

[openstack-dev] [nova] next min libvirt?

2016-04-29 Thread Sean Dague
We've just landed the libvirt min to bump us up to 1.2.1 required. It's probably a good time consider the appropriate bump for Otaca. By that time our Ubuntu LTS will be 16.04 (libvirt 1.3.1), RHEL 7.1 (1.2.8). Additionally Debian Jessie has 1.2.9. RHEL 7.2 is at 1.2.17. My suggestion is we set