Tony Breeds wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:21:57AM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
Ya that makes sense, the patch can be altered to just block 4.13.1,2
(assuming 4.13.3 really does fix it)
I feel like we've gotten ourselves (well at least I'm confused) about what
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:21:57AM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
> Ya that makes sense, the patch can be altered to just block 4.13.1,2
> (assuming 4.13.3 really does fix it)
I feel like we've gotten ourselves (well at least I'm confused) about what
we're trying to achieve here.
It seem to be the
On 09/08/2016 03:59 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> I backported the fix to stable/newton:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367221/
>
> Once it’s in, we’ll trigger another oslo.db release.
>
> As for the blocking patch for requirements:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/365565/, I disagree that
I backported the fix to stable/newton:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367221/
Once it’s in, we’ll trigger another oslo.db release.
As for the blocking patch for requirements:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/365565/, I disagree that we should block
oslo.db 4.13.0, because atm pymysql
On 09/07/2016 07:44 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>
>>
>> Gnocchi is a service. It's not in the pip requirements list for
>> ceilometer, so releasing a new version of oslo.db and having that
>> trigger a new release of gnocchi won't also trigger a new release
>> of ceilometer to update its dependency
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 01:29:35PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> What do we have that uses oslo.db and is itself a library that would
> need to be re-released?
Package : oslo-db [oslo-db>=4.10.0] (used by 40 projects)
Re-Release : 1 projects
openstack/neutron-lib
Gnocchi is a service. It's not in the pip requirements list for
ceilometer, so releasing a new version of oslo.db and having that
trigger a new release of gnocchi won't also trigger a new release
of ceilometer to update its dependency list.
The service projects are not yet at their RC1 point,
Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2016-09-07 14:09:06 -0400:
>
> On 09/07/2016 01:29 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 09:11:58 -0500:
> >> On 09/07/2016 08:58 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >>> Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07
On 09/07/2016 01:29 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 09:11:58 -0500:
On 09/07/2016 08:58 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 08:21:50 -0500:
https://review.openstack.org/366298
This is just a bump to
Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 09:11:58 -0500:
> On 09/07/2016 08:58 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 08:21:50 -0500:
> >> https://review.openstack.org/366298
> >>
> >> This is just a bump to upper-constraints so is more minor to
just a heads up, oslo.db 4.13.2 is also broken. we will need this:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/366362/ or something that fixes issue :)
On 07/09/16 09:21 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> https://review.openstack.org/366298
>
> This is just a bump to upper-constraints so is more minor to get
On 09/07/2016 08:58 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 08:21:50 -0500:
>> https://review.openstack.org/366298
>>
>> This is just a bump to upper-constraints so is more minor to get testing
>> working and fix the bug that occurred in Gnocchi (and possibly
Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 08:21:50 -0500:
> https://review.openstack.org/366298
>
> This is just a bump to upper-constraints so is more minor to get testing
> working and fix the bug that occurred in Gnocchi (and possibly others).
>
> We are able to mask the 'bad'
https://review.openstack.org/366298
This is just a bump to upper-constraints so is more minor to get testing
working and fix the bug that occurred in Gnocchi (and possibly others).
We are able to mask the 'bad' versions of oslo.db and unmask pymysql
0.7.7 after the freeze (and backport them to
14 matches
Mail list logo