Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [telemetry] [requirements] [FFE] Oslo.db 4.13.2

2016-09-09 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Tony Breeds wrote: On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:21:57AM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote: Ya that makes sense, the patch can be altered to just block 4.13.1,2 (assuming 4.13.3 really does fix it) I feel like we've gotten ourselves (well at least I'm confused) about what

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [telemetry] [requirements] [FFE] Oslo.db 4.13.2

2016-09-08 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:21:57AM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote: > Ya that makes sense, the patch can be altered to just block 4.13.1,2 > (assuming 4.13.3 really does fix it) I feel like we've gotten ourselves (well at least I'm confused) about what we're trying to achieve here. It seem to be the

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [telemetry] [requirements] [FFE] Oslo.db 4.13.2

2016-09-08 Thread Matthew Thode
On 09/08/2016 03:59 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > I backported the fix to stable/newton: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367221/ > > Once it’s in, we’ll trigger another oslo.db release. > > As for the blocking patch for requirements: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/365565/, I disagree that

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [telemetry] [requirements] [FFE] Oslo.db 4.13.2

2016-09-08 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
I backported the fix to stable/newton: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367221/ Once it’s in, we’ll trigger another oslo.db release. As for the blocking patch for requirements: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/365565/, I disagree that we should block oslo.db 4.13.0, because atm pymysql

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [telemetry] [requirements] [FFE] Oslo.db 4.13.2

2016-09-07 Thread Matthew Thode
On 09/07/2016 07:44 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > >> >> Gnocchi is a service. It's not in the pip requirements list for >> ceilometer, so releasing a new version of oslo.db and having that >> trigger a new release of gnocchi won't also trigger a new release >> of ceilometer to update its dependency

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [telemetry] [requirements] [FFE] Oslo.db 4.13.2

2016-09-07 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 01:29:35PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > What do we have that uses oslo.db and is itself a library that would > need to be re-released? Package : oslo-db [oslo-db>=4.10.0] (used by 40 projects) Re-Release : 1 projects openstack/neutron-lib

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [telemetry] [requirements] [FFE] Oslo.db 4.13.2

2016-09-07 Thread Joshua Harlow
Gnocchi is a service. It's not in the pip requirements list for ceilometer, so releasing a new version of oslo.db and having that trigger a new release of gnocchi won't also trigger a new release of ceilometer to update its dependency list. The service projects are not yet at their RC1 point,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [telemetry] [requirements] [FFE] Oslo.db 4.13.2

2016-09-07 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2016-09-07 14:09:06 -0400: > > On 09/07/2016 01:29 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 09:11:58 -0500: > >> On 09/07/2016 08:58 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >>> Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [telemetry] [requirements] [FFE] Oslo.db 4.13.2

2016-09-07 Thread Mike Bayer
On 09/07/2016 01:29 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 09:11:58 -0500: On 09/07/2016 08:58 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 08:21:50 -0500: https://review.openstack.org/366298 This is just a bump to

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [telemetry] [requirements] [FFE] Oslo.db 4.13.2

2016-09-07 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 09:11:58 -0500: > On 09/07/2016 08:58 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 08:21:50 -0500: > >> https://review.openstack.org/366298 > >> > >> This is just a bump to upper-constraints so is more minor to

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [telemetry] [requirements] [FFE] Oslo.db 4.13.2

2016-09-07 Thread gordon chung
just a heads up, oslo.db 4.13.2 is also broken. we will need this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/366362/ or something that fixes issue :) On 07/09/16 09:21 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > https://review.openstack.org/366298 > > This is just a bump to upper-constraints so is more minor to get

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [telemetry] [requirements] [FFE] Oslo.db 4.13.2

2016-09-07 Thread Matthew Thode
On 09/07/2016 08:58 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 08:21:50 -0500: >> https://review.openstack.org/366298 >> >> This is just a bump to upper-constraints so is more minor to get testing >> working and fix the bug that occurred in Gnocchi (and possibly

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [telemetry] [requirements] [FFE] Oslo.db 4.13.2

2016-09-07 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-07 08:21:50 -0500: > https://review.openstack.org/366298 > > This is just a bump to upper-constraints so is more minor to get testing > working and fix the bug that occurred in Gnocchi (and possibly others). > > We are able to mask the 'bad'

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [telemetry] [requirements] [FFE] Oslo.db 4.13.2

2016-09-07 Thread Matthew Thode
https://review.openstack.org/366298 This is just a bump to upper-constraints so is more minor to get testing working and fix the bug that occurred in Gnocchi (and possibly others). We are able to mask the 'bad' versions of oslo.db and unmask pymysql 0.7.7 after the freeze (and backport them to