On 9/20/2017 9:42 AM, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote:
Lee,
I can chair meeting in Sydney.
Thanks,
Arkady
Arkady,
Are you actually moderating the forum session in Sydney because the
session says Eric McCormick is the session moderator:
On 21-09-17 15:10:52, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Sean Dague wrote:
> > Agreed. We're already at 5 upgrade tags now?
> >
> > I think honestly we're going to need a picture to explain the
> > differences between them. Based on the confusion that kept seeming to
> > come during discussions at the PTG,
On 20-09-17 14:56:20, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote:
> Lee,
> I can chair meeting in Sydney.
> Thanks,
> Arkady
Thanks Arkady!
FYI I see that emccormickva has created the following Forum session to
discuss FF upgrades:
http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/19
You might want to reach
On 2017-09-21 13:29:53 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
[...]
> On the other hand, some of those were meant to be aspirational, so
> not documenting them may mean no one is thinking about them at
> all.
Previous tags were added to document existing state/practices and
came with projects
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-09-21 17:10:52 +0200:
> Sean Dague wrote:
> > Agreed. We're already at 5 upgrade tags now?
> >
> > I think honestly we're going to need a picture to explain the
> > differences between them. Based on the confusion that kept seeming to
> > come during
Sean Dague wrote:
> Agreed. We're already at 5 upgrade tags now?
>
> I think honestly we're going to need a picture to explain the
> differences between them. Based on the confusion that kept seeming to
> come during discussions at the PTG, I think we need to circle around and
> figure out if
On 09/20/2017 02:25 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Dan Smith's message of 2017-09-20 10:09:54 -0700:
- Modify the `supports-upgrades`[3] and `supports-accessible-upgrades`[4] tags
I have yet to look into the formal process around making changes to
these tags but I will aim to
Excerpts from Dan Smith's message of 2017-09-20 10:09:54 -0700:
> >> - Modify the `supports-upgrades`[3] and `supports-accessible-upgrades`[4]
> >> tags
> >>
> >>I have yet to look into the formal process around making changes to
> >>these tags but I will aim to make a start ASAP.
> >
>
- Modify the `supports-upgrades`[3] and `supports-accessible-upgrades`[4] tags
I have yet to look into the formal process around making changes to
these tags but I will aim to make a start ASAP.
We've previously tried to avoid changing assert tag definitions because
we then have to
Excerpts from Lee Yarwood's message of 2017-09-20 14:29:12 +0100:
> My thanks again to everyone who attended and contributed to the
> skip-level upgrades track over the first two days of last weeks PTG.
> I've included a short summary of our discussions below with a list of
> agreed actions for
Lee,
I can chair meeting in Sydney.
Thanks,
Arkady
-Original Message-
From: Lee Yarwood [mailto:lyarw...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 8:29 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [skip-level-upgrades
Lee,
I can chair meeting in Sydney.
Thanks,
Arkady
-Original Message-
From: Lee Yarwood [mailto:lyarw...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 8:29 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [skip-level-upgrades
My thanks again to everyone who attended and contributed to the
skip-level upgrades track over the first two days of last weeks PTG.
I've included a short summary of our discussions below with a list of
agreed actions for Queens at the end.
tl;dr s/skip-level/fast-forward/g
13 matches
Mail list logo
