Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

2017-10-23 Thread Sam Matzek
The Keystone v2 removal also broke Trove's gate. Trove's functional and scenario tests had Keystone v2 hard codings and also relied on a > 4 year old 'compat' client package in the python-troveclient that did not have V3 support. Both cases required a lot of scrambling find all the v2 hard

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

2017-10-22 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2017-10-21 13:37:01 +: > On 2017-10-20 22:50:53 + (+), Fox, Kevin M wrote: > [...] > > Ideally, there should be an OpenStack overarching architecture > > team of some sort to handle this kind of thing I think. > > There was one for a while,

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

2017-10-21 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-10-20 22:50:53 + (+), Fox, Kevin M wrote: [...] > Ideally, there should be an OpenStack overarching architecture > team of some sort to handle this kind of thing I think. There was one for a while, but it dissolved due to lack of community participation. If you'd like to help

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

2017-10-20 Thread Cody A.W. Somerville
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > Let me clarify a few things regarding the V2.0 removal: > > * This has been planned for years at this point. At one time (I am > looking for the documentation, once I find it I'll include it on this > thread) we

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

2017-10-20 Thread Fox, Kevin M
Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal Let me clarify a few things regarding the V2.0 removal: * This has been planned for years at this point. At one time (I am looking for the documentation, once I find

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

2017-10-20 Thread Morgan Fainberg
t; Ideally, there should be an OpenStack overarching architecture team of some >> sort to handle this kind of thing I think. Without such an entity though, I >> think the TC is probably currently the best place to discuss it though? >> >> Thanks, >> Kevin >

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

2017-10-20 Thread Morgan Fainberg
such an entity though, I > think the TC is probably currently the best place to discuss it though? > > Thanks, > Kevin > > From: Jeremy Stanley [fu...@yuggoth.org] > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 10:53 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstac

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

2017-10-20 Thread Fox, Kevin M
] Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 10:53 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0API removal On 2017-10-20 17:15:59 + (+), Fox, Kevin M wrote: [...] > I know the TC's been shying away from these so

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

2017-10-20 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-10-20 17:15:59 + (+), Fox, Kevin M wrote: [...] > I know the TC's been shying away from these sorts of questions, > but this one has a pretty big impact. TC? [...] The OpenStack Technical Committee isn't really a bludgeon with which to beat teams when someone in the community

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

2017-10-20 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-10-20 10:59:36 +0800 (+0800), Yaguang Tang wrote: > Should this kind of change be discussed and have an agreement of > the TC and User committee? [...] Looks like this thread has split since bouncing back in from the operators ML, but I replied in the "other" dev ML thread for this topic

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

2017-10-20 Thread Fox, Kevin M
From: Yaguang Tang [heut2...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 7:59 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal Should this kind of change be discussed and have an agreement of the TC and User

[openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators][tc] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal

2017-10-19 Thread Yaguang Tang
Should this kind of change be discussed and have an agreement of the TC and User committee? -- Forwarded message -- From: Lance Bragstad Date: Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:08 AM Subject: [Openstack-operators] [keystone][all] v2.0 API removal To: "OpenStack