Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Stein PTG summary

On 09/27/2018 11:15 AM, Eric Fried wrote: On 09/27/2018 07:37 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 9/27/2018 5:23 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 2:46 AM Matt Riedemann mailto:mriede...@gmail.com>> wrote:     On 9/26/2018 5:30 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > So, during this day,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Stein PTG summary

On 09/27/2018 07:37 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 9/27/2018 5:23 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 2:46 AM Matt Riedemann > > wrote: >> >>     On 9/26/2018 5:30 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: >> > So, during this day, we also discussed about

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Stein PTG summary

On 9/27/2018 5:23 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 2:46 AM Matt Riedemann > wrote: On 9/26/2018 5:30 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > So, during this day, we also discussed about NUMA affinity and we said > that we could possibly use

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Stein PTG summary

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 2:46 AM Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 9/26/2018 5:30 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > > So, during this day, we also discussed about NUMA affinity and we said > > that we could possibly use nested resource providers for NUMA cells in > > Stein, but given we don't have yet a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Stein PTG summary

On 9/26/2018 5:30 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: So, during this day, we also discussed about NUMA affinity and we said that we could possibly use nested resource providers for NUMA cells in Stein, but given we don't have yet a specific Placement API query, NUMA affinity should still be using the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Stein PTG summary

Thanks for the recap email, Mel. Just a question inline for all the people that were in the room by Wednesday. Le jeu. 27 sept. 2018 à 00:10, melanie witt a écrit : > Hello everybody, > > I've written up a high level summary of the discussions we had at the > PTG -- please feel free to reply to