[openstack-dev] no tap interface on compute node

2014-06-16 Thread abhishek jain
Hi I'm not able to get tap interface up on compute node when I boot VM from controller node onto compute node. Please help regarding this. Thanks Abhishek Jain ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed locking

2014-06-16 Thread Jay Pipes
On 06/13/2014 05:01 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Jay Pipes wrote: This is news to me. When was this decided and where can I read about it? Originally https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/blueprints/service-sync has been proposed, presented and accepted back at the Icehouse

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][ServiceVM] servicevm IRC meeting reminder (June 17 Tuesday 5:00(AM)UTC-)

2014-06-16 Thread Isaku Yamahata
Hi. This is a reminder mail for the servicevm IRC meeting June 17, 2014 Tuesdays 5:00(AM)UTC- #openstack-meeting on freenode https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ServiceVM Maybe some won't make it because of mid-cycle meet up, though. agenda: (feel free to add your items) * announcement *

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer 7 switching RST document on Gerrit

2014-06-16 Thread Avishay Balderman
Hi Please review. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99709/ Thanks Avishay ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Starting contributing to project

2014-06-16 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, I would suggest that you start from the master branch. Good luck. Thanks HGary On 6/15/14, 11:10 PM, Sławek Kapłoński sla...@kaplonski.pl wrote: Hello, I want to start contributing to neutron project. I found bug which I want to try fix:

[openstack-dev] [sahara] 2014.1.1 (stable/icehouse) released

2014-06-16 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hey folks, I'm glad to announce the release of the 2014.1.1 (stable/icehouse). You can find more info at launchpad page: https://launchpad.net/sahara/+milestone/2014.1.1 The next stable/icehouse release is planned for Aug 7. Thanks. -- Sincerely yours, Sergey Lukjanov Sahara Technical Lead

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Eventletdev] Eventlet 0.15 pre-release testers needed

2014-06-16 Thread Victor Sergeyev
Hello Folks! AFAIK, new eventlet version have limited PY3 support. So, unfortunately, it is not ready for work with python 3 in production. See issue [1] on github. Anyway, at least we will be in able to install eventlet in PY3 environment and (I hope) to test some openstack features (or mock

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

2014-06-16 Thread Thierry Carrez
Robert Collins wrote: [...] C - If we can't make it harder to get races in, perhaps we can make it easier to get races out. We have pretty solid emergent statistics from every gate job that is run as check. What if set a policy that when a gate queue gets a race: - put a zuul stop all

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Using saltstack as orchestrator for fuel

2014-06-16 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Guys, First of all we need to agree about what orchestration is. In terms of Fuel orchestration is task management (or scheduling) + task running. In other words an orchestrator needs to be able to get data (yaml, json, etc.) and to decide what to do, when and where and then do that. For task

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Symlinks to new stuff for OpenStack Patching

2014-06-16 Thread Matthew Mosesohn
Hi Igor, The repo directory its is too large to fit in a docker container and work reliably. It is just a symlink inside the repo storage container from host:/var/www/nailgun to repo-container:/repo. This /repo folder is shared out to containers, such as nginx, and then symlinks are created for

[openstack-dev] An alternative approach to enforcing expected election behaviour

2014-06-16 Thread Eoghan Glynn
TL;DR: how about we adopt a soft enforcement model, relying on sound judgement and good faith within the community? Hi Folks, I'm concerned that the expected election behaviour review[1] is not converging on the optimal approach, partially due to the initial concentration on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [marconi] replicate messages among servers

2014-06-16 Thread wpf
Hi If you are using the mongodb, then you can leverage the replication sets, for example ,the uri for mongodb uri = mongodb://mydb1,mydb2,mydb3:27017/?replicaSet=catalog... for some more, you can refer to http://docs.openstack.org/developer/marconi/installing.html On Sun, Jun 15,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

2014-06-16 Thread thomas.morin
Hi all, We've just released our implementation of BGP VPN extensions (called 'BaGPipe'), under a opensource license : https://github.com/Orange-OpenSource/bagpipe-bgp It reuses some code from ExaBGP, but with a dedicated engine for VPN instance creation through a rest API, and a modular

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Symlinks to new stuff for OpenStack Patching

2014-06-16 Thread Evgeniy L
Hi, In case of OpenStack patching you don't need to create any symlinks and mount new directories, you can just create new subdirectory in /var/www/nailgun with specific version of openstack, like /var/www/nailgun/ 5.0.1. And then use it as a repository path for new OpenStack releases. On Mon,

Re: [openstack-dev] [marconi] replicate messages among servers

2014-06-16 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 16/06/14 17:06 +0800, wpf wrote: Hi    If you are using the mongodb, then you can leverage the replication sets,  for example ,the uri for mongodb    uri = mongodb://mydb1,mydb2,mydb3:27017/?replicaSet=catalog...   for some more, you can refer to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ironic] what to do with unit test failures from ironic api contract

2014-06-16 Thread Day, Phil
From: David Shrewsbury [mailto:shrewsbury.d...@gmail.com] Sent: 14 June 2014 02:10 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: Shrewsbury, David; Van Der Veen, Devananda Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ironic] what to do with unit test failures from ironic api

[openstack-dev] [FUEL] Authentication in FUEL meeting notes

2014-06-16 Thread Alexander Kislitsky
16.07.2014 meeting results: Participants: L. Oles N. Markov V. Kramskikh A. Kislitsky Acceptance points of authentication in FUEL: 1. Each project (nailgun, CLI, UI, OSTF) should authenticate in Keystone and use received token in other services requests 2. Authentication can be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Symlinks to new stuff for OpenStack Patching

2014-06-16 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Hello, Thanks for input, guys. So we need to prepare infrastructure for that. - Igor On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, In case of OpenStack patching you don't need to create any symlinks and mount new directories, you can just create new subdirectory

Re: [openstack-dev] An alternative approach to enforcing expected election behaviour

2014-06-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 05:04:51AM -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote: How about we rely instead on the values and attributes that actually make our community strong? Specifically: maturity, honesty, and a self-correcting nature. How about we simply require that each candidate for a TC or PTL

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

2014-06-16 Thread Sean Dague
On 06/16/2014 04:33 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Robert Collins wrote: [...] C - If we can't make it harder to get races in, perhaps we can make it easier to get races out. We have pretty solid emergent statistics from every gate job that is run as check. What if set a policy that when a gate

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] ML2 support in Fuel deployment risks

2014-06-16 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Fuelers, Andrew, I've talked to Sergey V. today about ML2 support in Fuel. Our current approach [1] is to port upstream puppet module for Neutron which has support of ML2, however our Neutron module is significantly diverged from upstream one (at least for Neutron HA deployment capabilities), as

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: Fwd: Debian people don't like bash8 as a project name (Bug#748383: ITP: bash8 -- bash script style guide checker)

2014-06-16 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes: bashate ftw. +1 to bashate Chmouel ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Tuskar-UI] Two new tests in jenkins

2014-06-16 Thread Peter Belanyi
Hi all, Just some info, recently two new test jobs have been added to jenkins for tuskar-ui: - selenium for running qunit tests (javascript unit tests) - jshint for javascript linting The jobs are currently non-voting, I'll change them to voting if they seem to work fine. -- Kind Regards,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] REST API - entity level validation

2014-06-16 Thread Avishay Balderman
Salvatore Will Neutron is going to follow Nova? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-api-validation-fw Avishay From: Salvatore Orlando [mailto:sorla...@nicira.com] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 12:36 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] VMware ESX Driver Deprecation

2014-06-16 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 to Option #2. -- dims On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: Hi, In the Icehouse cycle it was decided to deprecate the VMware ESX driver. The motivation for the decision was: The driver is not validated by Minesweeper It is not clear if there are

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][messaging] Further improvements and refactoring

2014-06-16 Thread Gordon Sim
On 06/13/2014 02:06 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: On 10/06/14 15:40, Alexei Kornienko wrote: On 06/10/2014 03:59 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: I think there could be a lot of work required to significantly improve that driver, and I wonder if that would be better spent on e.g. the AMQP 1.0 driver which

[openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Sean Dague
Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire check queue was flooded this morning with requirements proposals failing pep8 because of it (so at 6am EST we were waiting 1.5 hrs for a check node). The previous soft policy with pep8 updates was that we set a pep8 version

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Weekly community meeting - 06/16/2014

2014-06-16 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Hi, This is a reminder about another community IRC meeting at #openstack-meeting today at 16.00 UTC. The agenda is usual: Review action items Current status (quickly by team members) Further plans Open discussion Looking forward to see you there. [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] Need help on developing Neutron application to receive messages from Open Day Light

2014-06-16 Thread venkatesh.nag
Hi, I am new to both open stack and open daylight. I have to write an application / plugin to receive messages From open daylight neutron interface, can you please provide a reference or an example of how to go about it ? Many thanks, Venkatesh The information contained in this electronic

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Horizon] Exposing and showing associated resource_id within alarms/combined alarms

2014-06-16 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Hello guys, I was taking a look at the proposed alarm-page designs [1] for the bp: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/ceilometer-alarm-management-page and I saw that the alarms table has a column named “Resource Name”. The intention of that column is to show the resources

Re: [openstack-dev] no tap interface on compute node

2014-06-16 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:31:50AM +0530, abhishek jain wrote: Hi I'm not able to get tap interface up on compute node when I boot VM from controller node onto compute node. Please help regarding this. For such usage questions, please post (with more verbose details including Neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] no tap interface on compute node

2014-06-16 Thread abhishek jain
Hi I posted it on ask.openstack.org but I got no response. On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:31:50AM +0530, abhishek jain wrote: Hi I'm not able to get tap interface up on compute node when I boot VM from

[openstack-dev] [oslo][messaging] messaging vs. messagingv2

2014-06-16 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi all, I'm currently pushing Neutron to oslo.messaging, and while at it, a question popped up. So in oslo-rpc, we have the following notification drivers available: neutron.openstack.common.notifier.log_notifier

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Nominating Ken'ichi Ohmichi for nova-core

2014-06-16 Thread Andrew Laski
+1 On 06/13/2014 06:40 PM, Michael Still wrote: Greetings, I would like to nominate Ken'ichi Ohmichi for the nova-core team. Ken'ichi has been involved with nova for a long time now. His reviews on API changes are excellent, and he's been part of the team that has driven the new API work

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Thierry Carrez
Sean Dague wrote: Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire check queue was flooded this morning with requirements proposals failing pep8 because of it (so at 6am EST we were waiting 1.5 hrs for a check node). The previous soft policy with pep8 updates was that we set

Re: [openstack-dev] An alternative approach to enforcing expected election behaviour

2014-06-16 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 10:56 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 05:04:51AM -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote: How about we rely instead on the values and attributes that actually make our community strong? Specifically: maturity, honesty, and a self-correcting nature.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Current status of Neutron 3rd Party CI and how to move forward

2014-06-16 Thread Salvatore Orlando
I will probably be unable, as usual, to attend today's CI meeting (falls right around my dinner time). I think it's a good idea to starting keeping track of the status of the various CI systems, but I feel the etherpad will not work very well in the long term. However, it would be great if we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Specs repo

2014-06-16 Thread Ana Krivokapic
On 06/11/2014 05:22 PM, Jason Rist wrote: On Wed 11 Jun 2014 06:54:53 AM MDT, Ana Krivokapic wrote: Hi Horizoners, A lot of other projects have already adopted and started using a specs repo. Do we want to have one for Horizon? I'm still not quite clear how this works, but I'm open to it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Implementing new LBaaS API

2014-06-16 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote: Salvatore, Also - since it seems to me that there is also consensus regarding having load balancing move away into a separate project To me it seems that there was no such a consensus; core team members were

Re: [openstack-dev] Need help on developing Neutron application to receive messages from Open Day Light

2014-06-16 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 7:17 AM, venkatesh@wipro.com wrote: Hi, I am new to both open stack and open daylight. I have to write an application / plugin to receive messages From open daylight neutron interface, can you please provide a reference or an example of how to go about it ?

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Current status of Neutron 3rd Party CI and how to move forward

2014-06-16 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: I will probably be unable, as usual, to attend today's CI meeting (falls right around my dinner time). I think it's a good idea to starting keeping track of the status of the various CI systems, but I feel the

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

2014-06-16 Thread Chris Dent
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Sean Dague wrote: So if we can't evolve the system back towards health, we need to just cut a bunch of stuff off until we can. +1 This is kind of the crux of the biscuit. As things stand there's so much noise that it's far too easy to think and act like it is somebody

Re: [openstack-dev] Rethink how we manage projects? (was Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate)

2014-06-16 Thread David Kranz
On 06/16/2014 05:33 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: David Kranz wrote: [...] There is a different way to do this. We could adopt the same methodology we have now around gating, but applied to each project on its own branch. These project branches would be integrated into master at some frequency or

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Current status of Neutron 3rd Party CI and how to move forward

2014-06-16 Thread Salvatore Orlando
On 16 June 2014 15:58, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: I will probably be unable, as usual, to attend today's CI meeting (falls right around my dinner time). I think it's a good idea to starting

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Current status of Neutron 3rd Party CI and how to move forward

2014-06-16 Thread Ilya Shakhat
However, it would be great if we could start devising a solution for having health reports from the various CI systems. This report should report the following kind of information: - timestamp of last run - timestamp of last vote (a system might start job which then get aborted for

Re: [openstack-dev] An alternative approach to enforcing expected election behaviour

2014-06-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 10:56 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 05:04:51AM -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote: How about we rely instead on the values and attributes that actually make our community strong?

Re: [openstack-dev] NFV in OpenStack use cases and context

2014-06-16 Thread Yathiraj Udupi (yudupi)
Hi Sylvain, The Smart Scheduler work should work along withGantt easily, as it is just another scheduler driver, instead of using the Filters, it will have a separate mechanism of solving the placement problem all at once. So just like how it currently works along with Nova scheduler, it should

Re: [openstack-dev] An alternative approach to enforcing expected election behaviour

2014-06-16 Thread Eoghan Glynn
On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 10:56 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 05:04:51AM -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote: How about we rely instead on the values and attributes that actually make our community strong? Specifically: maturity, honesty, and a self-correcting

[openstack-dev] [qa] Clarification of policy for qa-specs around adding new tests

2014-06-16 Thread David Kranz
I have been reviewing some of these specs and sense a lack of clarity around what is expected. In the pre-qa-specs world we did not want tempest blueprints to be used by projects to track their tempest test submissions because the core review team did not want to have to spend a lot of time

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [UX] Design for Alarming and Alarm Management

2014-06-16 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Apologies for the top-posting, but just wanted to call out some potential confusion that arose on the #os-ceilometer channel earlier today. TL;DR: the UI shouldn't assume a 1:1 mapping between alarms and resources, since this mapping does not exist in general Background: See ML post[1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Clarification of policy for qa-specs around adding new tests

2014-06-16 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:46:51AM -0400, David Kranz wrote: I have been reviewing some of these specs and sense a lack of clarity around what is expected. In the pre-qa-specs world we did not want tempest blueprints to be used by projects to track their tempest test submissions because the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Nominating Ken'ichi Ohmichi for nova-core

2014-06-16 Thread Aaron Rosen
+1 On Monday, June 16, 2014, Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.com wrote: +1 On 06/13/2014 06:40 PM, Michael Still wrote: Greetings, I would like to nominate Ken'ichi Ohmichi for the nova-core team. Ken'ichi has been involved with nova for a long time now. His reviews on API changes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Consolidated metrics proposal

2014-06-16 Thread Buraschi, Andres
Hi Jorge, thanks for your reply! You are right about summarizing too much. The idea is to identify which kinds of data could be retrieved in a summarized way without losing detail (i.e.: uptime can be better described with start-end timestamps than with lots of samples with up/down status) or

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Current status of Neutron 3rd Party CI and how to move forward

2014-06-16 Thread Anita Kuno
On 06/16/2014 10:25 AM, Ilya Shakhat wrote: However, it would be great if we could start devising a solution for having health reports from the various CI systems. This report should report the following kind of information: - timestamp of last run - timestamp of last vote (a system might

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Current status of Neutron 3rd Party CI and how to move forward

2014-06-16 Thread Anita Kuno
On 06/16/2014 09:52 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: I will probably be unable, as usual, to attend today's CI meeting (falls right around my dinner time). I'm sorry to hear that, since I value your input in these matters. Your CI system is doing an excellent job and I use it as an example for

[openstack-dev] [barbican] Meeting Monday June 16 at 20:00 UTC

2014-06-16 Thread Douglas Mendizabal
Hi Everyone, The Barbican team is hosting our weekly meeting today, Monday June 16nd, at 20:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt Meeting agenda is available here https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Barbican and everyone is welcomed to add agenda items. You can check this link

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Backwards compatibility policy for our projects

2014-06-16 Thread Tomas Sedovic
All, After having proposed some changes[1][2] to tripleo-heat-templates[3], reviewers suggested adding a deprecation period for the merge.py script. While TripleO is an official OpenStack program, none of the projects under its umbrella (including tripleo-heat-templates) have gone through

[openstack-dev] [FWD] KVM Forum 2014 Call for Participation

2014-06-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
- Forwarded message from Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com - Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 18:08:17 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com To: qemu-devel qemu-de...@nongnu.org Subject: [Qemu-devel] KVM Forum 2014 Call for Participation

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Backwards compatibility policy for our projects

2014-06-16 Thread Jason Rist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon 16 Jun 2014 10:19:40 AM MDT, Tomas Sedovic wrote: All, After having proposed some changes[1][2] to tripleo-heat-templates[3], reviewers suggested adding a deprecation period for the merge.py script. While TripleO is an official

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

2014-06-16 Thread Joe Gordon
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 06/13/2014 06:47 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com mailto:dpri...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 09:24 -0700, Joe Gordon wrote: On Jun

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Refactor ISCSIDriver to support other iSCSI transports besides TCP

2014-06-16 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Shlomi Sasson shlo...@mellanox.com wrote: Of course I’m aware of that.. I’m the one who pushed it there in the first place J But it was not the best way to handle this.. I think that the right/better approach is as suggested. I’m planning to remove the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Backwards compatibility policy for our projects

2014-06-16 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 16 June 2014 17:30, Jason Rist jr...@redhat.com wrote: I'm going to have to agree with Tomas here. There doesn't seem to be any reasonable expectation of backwards compatibility for the reasons he outlined, despite some downstream releases that may be impacted. Backward compatibility is a

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Ben Nemec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Sean Dague wrote: Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire check queue was flooded this morning with requirements proposals failing pep8 because of it (so at 6am EST we were

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Backwards compatibility policy for our projects

2014-06-16 Thread Arkady_Kanevsky
Why is OOO being singled out for backwards compatibility? -Original Message- From: Duncan Thomas [mailto:duncan.tho...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 11:42 AM To: jr...@redhat.com; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Backwards compatibility policy for our projects

2014-06-16 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Tomas Sedovic's message of 2014-06-16 09:19:40 -0700: All, After having proposed some changes[1][2] to tripleo-heat-templates[3], reviewers suggested adding a deprecation period for the merge.py script. While TripleO is an official OpenStack program, none of the projects

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Backwards compatibility policy for our projects

2014-06-16 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Duncan Thomas's message of 2014-06-16 09:41:49 -0700: On 16 June 2014 17:30, Jason Rist jr...@redhat.com wrote: I'm going to have to agree with Tomas here. There doesn't seem to be any reasonable expectation of backwards compatibility for the reasons he outlined, despite some

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Sean Dague
On 06/16/2014 12:44 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Sean Dague wrote: Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire check queue was flooded this morning with requirements proposals failing pep8 because of it (so at 6am EST we were waiting

[openstack-dev] [Manila] GenericDriver cinder volume error during manila create

2014-06-16 Thread Deepak Shetty
I am trying devstack on F20 setup with Manila sources. When i am trying to do *manila create --name cinder_vol_share_using_nfs2 --share-network-id 36ec5a17-cef6-44a8-a518-457a6f36faa0 NFS 2 * I see the below error in c-vol due to which even tho' my service VM is started, manila create errors out

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

2014-06-16 Thread Mac Innes, Kiall
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 11:36 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: If someone can point me to a case where we've actually found this kind of bug with tempest / devstack, that would be great. I've just *never* seen it. I was the one that did most of the fixing for pg support in Nova, and have helped other

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Backwards compatibility policy for our projects

2014-06-16 Thread Duncan Thomas
Hi Clint This looks like a special pleading here - all OpenStack projects (or 'program' if you prefer - I'm honestly not seeing a difference) have bits that they've written quickly and would rather not have to maintain, but in order to allow people to make use of them downstream have to do that

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2014-06-16 05:15:54 -0700: Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire check queue was flooded this morning with requirements proposals failing pep8 because of it (so at 6am EST we were waiting 1.5 hrs for a check node). The previous

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Heat integration

2014-06-16 Thread Nikhil Manchanda
Denis Makogon writes: Good day, Stackers, Trove community. I'd like to start thread related to orchestration based resource management. At current state Heat support in Trove is nothing else than experimental. Trove should be able to fully support Trove as resource management driver. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [metrics] How to group activity in git/gerrit repositories

2014-06-16 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On Fri 13 Jun 2014 10:51:24 AM PDT, Stangel, Dan wrote: You can also refer to the example of Stackalytics, who have created their own hierarchy and groupings for metrics reporting: https://github.com/stackforge/stackalytics/blob/master/etc/default_data.json It's a very neat grouping. It seems

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

2014-06-16 Thread Robert Collins
On 16 Jun 2014 20:33, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Robert Collins wrote: [...] C - If we can't make it harder to get races in, perhaps we can make it easier to get races out. We have pretty solid emergent statistics from every gate job that is run as check. What if set a

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

2014-06-16 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 06/13/2014 06:47 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com mailto:dpri...@redhat.com wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

2014-06-16 Thread Robert Collins
On 16 Jun 2014 22:33, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 06/16/2014 04:33 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Robert Collins wrote: [...] C - If we can't make it harder to get races in, perhaps we can make it easier to get races out. We have pretty solid emergent statistics from every gate job

Re: [openstack-dev] how to install fuel on a esxi vm

2014-06-16 Thread Andrey Danin
Hi, Wang. Could you provide a network topology of your installation (incliding hardware and virtual L2/L3 parts of it)? Also, please, check this instruction http://vbyron.com/blog/deploy-openstack-on-vsphere-with-fuel/ On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Wang Liming wan...@certusnet.com.cn wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Backwards compatibility policy for our projects

2014-06-16 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Duncan Thomas's message of 2014-06-16 10:46:12 -0700: Hi Clint This looks like a special pleading here - all OpenStack projects (or 'program' if you prefer - I'm honestly not seeing a difference) have bits that they've written quickly and would rather not have to maintain, but

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Joe Gordon
On Jun 16, 2014 9:44 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Sean Dague wrote: Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire check queue was flooded this morning with

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Joe Gordon
On Jun 16, 2014 10:02 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 06/16/2014 12:44 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Sean Dague wrote: Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire check queue was flooded this morning with requirements

Re: [openstack-dev] Rethink how we manage projects? (was Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate)

2014-06-16 Thread Chris Friesen
On 06/16/2014 03:33 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: David Kranz wrote: [...] There is a different way to do this. We could adopt the same methodology we have now around gating, but applied to each project on its own branch. These project branches would be integrated into master at some frequency or

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Heat integration

2014-06-16 Thread Zane Bitter
On 16/06/14 13:56, Nikhil Manchanda wrote: Denis Makogon writes: Because Trove should not do what it does now (cloud service orchestration is not the part of the OS Database Program). Trove should delegate all tasks to Cloud Orchestration Service (Heat). Agreed that Trove should delegate

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [UX] Design for Alarming and Alarm Management

2014-06-16 Thread Liz Blanchard
On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: Apologies for the top-posting, but just wanted to call out some potential confusion that arose on the #os-ceilometer channel earlier today. TL;DR: the UI shouldn't assume a 1:1 mapping between alarms and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Barbican Neutron LBaaS Integration Ideas

2014-06-16 Thread Stephen Balukoff
I would like to see something more sophisticated than a simple counter (it's so easy for a counter to get off when dealing with non-atomic asynchronous commands). But a counter is a good place to start. On Jun 13, 2014 6:54 AM, Jain, Vivek vivekj...@ebay.com wrote: +2. I totally agree with your

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

2014-06-16 Thread Joe Gordon
On Jun 14, 2014 11:12 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: You know its bad when you can't sleep because you're redesigning gate workflows in your head so I apologise that this email is perhaps not as rational, nor as organised, as usual - but , . :) Obviously this is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [UX] Design for Alarming and Alarm Management

2014-06-16 Thread Eoghan Glynn
On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: Apologies for the top-posting, but just wanted to call out some potential confusion that arose on the #os-ceilometer channel earlier today. TL;DR: the UI shouldn't assume a 1:1 mapping between alarms and

[openstack-dev] [nova][vmwareapi] Spawn Refactor progress

2014-06-16 Thread Tracy Jones
Our phase 1 of spawn refactor merged a week or 2 ago and we are hard at work on phase 2 and 3. The patch set has been posted. Here is the list in order to review for your convenience not a refactor by a trivial fix to clean up some code before the refactor

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do any hyperviors allow disk reduction as part of resize ?

2014-06-16 Thread Eric Brown
This is a fix in flight for the vmware driver. It also throws an exception on disk size reduction. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85804/ On Jun 13, 2014, at 3:02 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote: Hi Folks, I was looking at the resize code in libvirt, and it has checks which

Re: [openstack-dev] [metrics] How to group activity in git/gerrit repositories

2014-06-16 Thread Ilya Shakhat
Let me explain how Stackalytics grouping works. Most of groups are created from the official programs http://programs.yaml .yaml. Every program turns into item in the module list (colored in violet), for example 'Nova Compute' is a group containing 'nova', 'python-novaclient' and 'nova-specs'.

[openstack-dev] [nova] locked instances and snaphot

2014-06-16 Thread melanie witt
Hi all, Recently a nova bug [1] was opened where the user describes a scenario where an instance that is locked is still able to be snapshotted (create image and backup). In the case of Trove, instances are locked ...to ensure integrity and protect secrets which are needed by the resident

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Mid-cycle meetup for Cinder devs

2014-06-16 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:58 PM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:16 PM, D'Angelo, Scott scott.dang...@hp.com wrote: During the June 11 #openstack-cinder meeting we discussed a mid-cycle meetup. The agenda is To be Determined. I have inquired

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer] FloatingIp pollster spamming n-api logs (bug 1328694)

2014-06-16 Thread Joe Gordon
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - On 11 June 2014 20:07, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 6/11/2014 10:01 AM, Eoghan Glynn

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Barbican Neutron LBaaS Integration Ideas

2014-06-16 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Doug Wiegley's message of 2014-06-10 14:41:29 -0700: Of what use is a database that randomly delete rows? That is, in effect, what you’re allowing. The secrets are only useful when paired with a service. And unless I’m mistaken, there’s no undo. So you’re letting users

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Specific example NFV use case for a data plane app

2014-06-16 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - From: Calum Loudon calum.lou...@metaswitch.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Hello all At Wednesday's meeting I promised to supply specific examples to help illustrate the NFV use cases and

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Backwards compatibility policy for our projects

2014-06-16 Thread James Slagle
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Tomas Sedovic tsedo...@redhat.com wrote: All, After having proposed some changes[1][2] to tripleo-heat-templates[3], reviewers suggested adding a deprecation period for the merge.py script. While TripleO is an official OpenStack program, none of the projects

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Review guidelines for API patches

2014-06-16 Thread Joe Gordon
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Phil, On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:28:30 + Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote: The documentation is NOT the canonical source for the behaviour of the API, currently the code should be seen as the reference. We've

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Mid-cycle meetup for Cinder devs

2014-06-16 Thread D'Angelo, Scott
The HP site is available Aug 11 -15th. I’m getting some help from our admin to book the room. Some questions she had and my tentative answers: • Is wireless ok? # Wireless should be fine, everyone will be using laptops • Do you need a speaker phone and projector? # Projector

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][messaging] messaging vs. messagingv2

2014-06-16 Thread Mark McLoughlin
Hi Ihar, On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 15:28 +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, I'm currently pushing Neutron to oslo.messaging, and while at it, a question popped up. So in oslo-rpc, we have the following notification drivers available: neutron.openstack.common.notifier.log_notifier

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Barbican Neutron LBaaS Integration Ideas

2014-06-16 Thread Doug Wiegley
nobody is calling Barbican a database. It is a place to store Š did you at least feel a heavy sense of irony as you typed those two statements? ³It¹s not a database, it just stores things!² :-) The real irony here is that in this rather firm stand of keeping the user in control of their

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Use MariaDB by default on Fedora

2014-06-16 Thread Jan Provazník
Hi, MariaDB is now included in Fedora repositories, this makes it easier to install and more stable option for Fedora installations. Currently MariaDB can be used by including mariadb (use mariadb.org pkgs) or mariadb-rdo (use redhat RDO pkgs) element when building an image. What do you think

  1   2   >