On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:08:08AM +1200, Steve Baker wrote:
I'd like to nominate Sergey Kraynev for heat-core. His reviews are
valuable and prolific, and his commits have shown a sound understanding
of heat internals.
http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/heat-group/60
+1
Hi Clint,
-Original Message-
From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com]
Sent: 26 June 2014 20:21
To: openstack-dev
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] os-refresh-config run frequency
So I see two problems highlighted above.
1) We don't re-assert ephemeral state set by o-r-c
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 27/06/2014 00:10
Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Sergey Kraynev for heat-core
I'd like to nominate Sergey Kraynev for heat-core. His reviews are
valuable and prolific, and his
Hi Chris,
-Original Message-
From: Chris Jones [mailto:c...@tenshu.net]
Sent: 26 June 2014 20:38
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] os-refresh-config run frequency
Hi
Given...
On 26 Jun 2014, at 20:20,
-Original Message-
From: Chris Jones [mailto:c...@tenshu.net]
Sent: 26 June 2014 20:58
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] os-refresh-config run frequency
Hi
On 26 Jun 2014, at 20:55, Clint Byrum
Hello Maksym,
last week I had more or less the same questions than you and I investigate
a little bit... Currently we have the *ipv6_ra_mode *and *ipv6_address_mode
*in the subnet entity. The way you combine these two values will determine
how and who will configure your VM´s IPv6 addresses. Not
On 06/27/2014 12:08 AM, Steve Baker wrote:
I'd like to nominate Sergey Kraynev for heat-core. His reviews are
valuable and prolific, and his commits have shown a sound understanding
of heat internals.
http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/heat-group/60
+1
Hi Swiftsters!
A basic question about swift eventual- versus strong-consistency.
The context is potentially using swift as a store for metric data.
Say datapoints {p1, p2, ..., p_i} are stored in a swift object.
Presumably these data are replicated across the object ring in
an eventually
it will make my tox result more clear -:)
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Fei Long Wang feil...@catalyst.net.nz
wrote:
Nataliia, good job. Glad to see we can pass the py33 gate.
On 27/06/14 03:40, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
Hi everyone, I just wanted to to congratulate Nataliia on making
Hello,
As our commits consistently pass py33 tests for last month (although not so
many changes were made), I propose to enable py33 job voting on
stackforge/rubick repository.
What do you think?
--
Best regards,
Oleg Gelbukh
___
OpenStack-dev mailing
It's clear that lots of projects want 3rd Party CI information on
patches. But it's also clear that 6 months into this experiment with a
lot of 3rd Party CI systems, the Gerrit UI is really not great for this.
A couple of things have fallen out of this. 3rd Party CI bots outnumber
Human comments
I noticed that Django 1.7 no longer supports Python 2.6:
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.7/#python-compatibility
Since it will be released in July/August, has there been any consideration
of making 2.7 the minimum for Horizon and Openstack Dashboard?
Guys,
We are going to merge feature groups
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/feature-groups, it will cause
small changes in iso build parameters.
MIRANTIS parameter is deprecated, please use FEATURE_GROUPS=mirantis
instead.
Another available feature group is 'experimental'. Without it
Hello!
So, we have a little problem with 'Disassociate IP' button in
Instances table when 'simple_ip_management' option is not specified in
Horizon's config - it is absent
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1325575). Having investigated
the problem a little bit, I found the following note in
On 27/06/14 07:40 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
It's clear that lots of projects want 3rd Party CI information on
patches. But it's also clear that 6 months into this experiment with a
lot of 3rd Party CI systems, the Gerrit UI is really not great for this.
A couple of things have fallen out of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/06/14 08:10, Steve Baker wrote:
I'd like to nominate Sergey Kraynev for heat-core. His reviews are valuable
and prolific, and
his commits have shown a sound understanding of heat internals.
On 26/06/14 15:40 +, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
Hi everyone, I just wanted to to congratulate Nataliia on making Marconi one of
the first OS project to pass the py33 gate!
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BrEQrZiCMAAbfEX.png:large
Now, let’s make that gate voting. :D
FWIW, it's already voting:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 07:40:51AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
It's clear that lots of projects want 3rd Party CI information on
patches. But it's also clear that 6 months into this experiment with a
lot of 3rd Party CI systems, the Gerrit UI is really not great for this.
That's an understatement
Hi everyone,
Since the dawn of time, we have been using milestone-proposed branches
for milestone and final release branches. Those would get
milestone-critical and release-critical bugfixes backports, while the
master branch can continue to be open for development.
However, reusing the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 26/06/14 22:38, Alexei Kornienko wrote:
Hello Jay,
Benchmark for oslo.messaging is really simple: You create a client
that sends messages infinitively and a server that processes them.
After you can use rabbitmq management plugin to see
Should this code cleanup be done separate from the update volume-Image-metadata
update bp or should be a work item of it?
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Thomas [mailto:duncan.tho...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 7:29 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Mark,
When would we be able to get a release of Oslo with 102909 fix in? It’s
preventing Jenkins passing for some commits in Neutron.
Thanks!
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A
Hello,
Please find some answers inline.
Regards,
Alexei
On 06/27/2014 04:04 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 26/06/14 22:38, Alexei Kornienko wrote:
Hello Jay,
Benchmark for oslo.messaging is really simple: You create a client
that sends
I have an All Hands this noon, so I could attend only to the first half of
Blazar meeting.
Pablo.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Something to consider is the create the queue in advance feature is done for
notifications, so we don't drop important messages on the floor by having an
Exchange with no associated Queue.
For RPC operations, this may not be required (we assume the service is
available). If this check is truly
Hi,
Why should we create queue in advance?
Let's consider following use cases:
1)
* listener starts and creates a queue
* publishers connect to exchange and start publishing
No need to create a queue in advance here since listener does it when it
starts
2)
* publishers create a queue in
On 06/27/2014 12:21 AM, Carlos Garza wrote:
I don't know where we can check in experimental code so I have a
demonstration
of how to extract CNs subjAltNames or what ever we want from x509
certificates. Later on
I plan to use the OpenSSL libraries to verify certs coming from barbican
Sure, why not? :)
On 06/27/2014 06:25 AM, Oleg Gelbukh wrote:
Hello,
As our commits consistently pass py33 tests for last month (although not
so many changes were made), I propose to enable py33 job voting on
stackforge/rubick repository.
What do you think?
--
Best regards,
Oleg Gelbukh
On 06/26/2014 09:38 PM, Alexei Kornienko wrote:
Benchmark for oslo.messaging is really simple:
You create a client that sends messages infinitively and a server that
processes them. After you can use rabbitmq management plugin to see
average throughput in the queue.
Simple example can be found
I think make it a work item on the blueprint. I honestly haven't
looked to see how much there'd be, just bought it up as a possible
requirement so that it didn't later come as a surprise to glance folks
On 27 June 2014 14:09, Maldonado, Facundo N
facundo.n.maldon...@intel.com wrote:
Should this
On 6/27/2014 11:27 AM, Alexei Kornienko wrote:
Hi,
Why should we create queue in advance?
Notifications are used for communicating with downstream systems (which may or
may not be online at the time). This includes dashboards, monitoring systems,
billing systems, etc. They can't afford to lose
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 07:40:51AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
It's clear that lots of projects want 3rd Party CI information on
patches. But it's also clear that 6 months into this experiment with a
lot of 3rd
Thanks you everyone for the chance to join to this awesome team!
It's honor for me and I hope, that my 5 cents will help to make Heat even
better :)
Regards,
Sergey.
On 27 June 2014 02:08, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like to nominate Sergey Kraynev for heat-core. His reviews are
On 06/27/2014 08:20 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 26/06/14 15:40 +, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
Hi everyone, I just wanted to to congratulate Nataliia on making
Marconi one of
the first OS project to pass the py33 gate!
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BrEQrZiCMAAbfEX.png:large
Now, let’s make
Excerpts from Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew's message of 2014-06-27 00:14:49 -0700:
Hi Clint,
-Original Message-
From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com]
Sent: 26 June 2014 20:21
To: openstack-dev
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] os-refresh-config run frequency
So
A question about the new 'retry' option. The doc says:
By default, cast() and call() will block until the
message is successfully sent.
What does 'successfully sent' mean here? Does it mean 'written to the
wire' or 'accepted by the broker'?
For the impl_qpid.py driver, each send is
I do apologise for omitting the subject qualifiers in my previous mail!
On 06/27/2014 05:02 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
A question about the new 'retry' option. The doc says:
By default, cast() and call() will block until the
message is successfully sent.
What does 'successfully sent'
This may be out of scope, but as a developer of an external tool that works
with OpenStack we would love an external interface to get this kind of
information more efficiently. Today we poll the state of all resources
periodically which is a pretty heavy operation. Ideally any work done for
Great questions. I'll answer inline.
On Jun 27, 2014, at 2:54 AM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Swiftsters!
A basic question about swift eventual- versus strong-consistency.
The context is potentially using swift as a store for metric data.
Say datapoints {p1, p2, ..., p_i}
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What if 3rd Party CI didn't vote in Gerrit? What if it instead
published to some 3rd party test reporting site (a thing that
doesn't yet exist). Gerrit has the facility so that we could inject
the dashboard content for this in Gerrit in a little
It doesn't look like NSS is currently used within Neutron or Keystone.
Another alternative would be to write the certificate to a temp file and
then invoke openssl x509 -text -noout -in $TEMP_FILE and parse the
output, Keystone currently does similar (keystone/common/openssl.py). Given
renewed
The Glance Mid-Cycle Meeting will be held July 24-25 at VMware, Inc, in Palo
Alto, CA, USA.
Info is here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-juno-mid-cycle-meeting
Please add proposals for discussion topics to the bottom of that etherpad, or
just add your name so we can guage interest, or
Sean, there is a proposal[1] in upstream gerrit to fix this issue. David's
proposal is to make Gerrit handle multiple notifications channels per
project which would allow us to treat bot notifications differently than
human notifications. He has the same problem as we do, most of his builds
are
Folks, now that we have Py3K support, we need to start thinking about things
that we need to do to tune performance when deploying on 3.3 or 3.4. I created
a blueprint (we are still working on getting our spec process set up) to start
the discussion here:
On 06/27/2014 02:19 PM, Zaro wrote:
Sean, there is a proposal[1] in upstream gerrit to fix this issue.
David's proposal is to make Gerrit handle multiple notifications
channels per project which would allow us to treat bot notifications
differently than human notifications. He has the same
David did suggest adding REST api endpoints to get data for each channel so
it doesn't necessarily require you to even use the gerrit web ui. However
the web UI's old screen is pretty much dead so I assume the presentation
would only be available in new change screen. I know Openstackers have
I do quite like the conflicts with part, I was thinking about that the
other day. That would be hugely useful.
-Sean
On 06/27/2014 02:56 PM, Zaro wrote:
David did suggest adding REST api endpoints to get data for each channel
so it doesn't necessarily require you to even use the gerrit
__In review and merged this past week__
Keep using the handy Gerrit dashboard for doc reviews at
http://is.gd/openstackdocreview.
We have a nearly-done instruction set for creating FreeBSD images in the
Virtual Machine Image Guide. Check it out at
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102265/
We've
Things are a bit confusing right now, especially with what's been
proposed. Let me try and clarify (even if just for my own sake).
Currently the choices offered are:
1. mysql percona with the percona tarball
2. mariadb galera with mariadb.org packages
3. mariadb galera with rdo packages
And,
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-06-27 12:59:36 -0700:
Things are a bit confusing right now, especially with what's been
proposed. Let me try and clarify (even if just for my own sake).
Currently the choices offered are:
1. mysql percona with the percona tarball
Percona
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-06-27 12:59:36 -0700:
Things are a bit confusing right now, especially with what's been
proposed. Let me try and clarify (even if just for my own sake).
Currently the choices
Hi all,
I'd like to remind folks that our mid cycle is now just one month away!
When:
July 28 - 30 2014
Where:
Intel Campus, 2111 Northeast 25th Avenue, Hillsboro, OR, 97124
Hotel information and other logistics can be found on the wiki page:
Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes:
It seems what we actually want is a dashboard of these results. We want
them available when we go to Gerrit, but we don't want them in Gerrit
itself.
I agree with most of what you wrote, particularly that we want them
available in Gerrit and with a sensible
I think this problem also exist in security group!
At 2014-06-27 11:20:31, stanzgy stan@gmail.com wrote:
I have filed this bug on nova
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1334938
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Yongsheng Gong gong...@unitedstack.com
wrote:
I have reported it on
Too late guys. I'm already grabbing the fields from pyasn1. I'm not writing
an ASN1
parser I'm using the one from pyasn1_modules.rfc2459.
I am in favor of using a common crypto lib which is why I was planning to use
the cryptography package that barbican already depends on to handle the
On Jun 27, 2014, at 9:26 AM, John Dennis jden...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/27/2014 12:21 AM, Carlos Garza wrote:
I don't know where we can check in experimental code so I have a
demonstration
of how to extract CNs subjAltNames or what ever we want from x509
certificates. Later on
I
On Jun 28, 2014, at 12:01 AM, Carlos Garza carlos.ga...@rackspace.com
wrote:
example python script using your example pem file. If using NSS isn't an
option I'd rather see us provide the necessary binding in pyopenssl than
handcraft one-off routines.
Are you saying you prefer us
57 matches
Mail list logo
