Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Picking a Name for the Tempest Library

-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Lack of consistency in returning response from tempest clients

___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Meaning of 204 from DELETE apis

___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [cinder] Do we now require schema response validation in tempest clients?

into different patches. Me too agree. Thanks Ghanshyam Mann ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev DISCLAIMER

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Checking for return codes in tempest client calls

(200, 207), https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90655/ implement the test for that and Schema for this API response validation should have multiple return code check. Thanks Ghanshyam Mann ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Branchless Tempest QA Spec - final draft

-house gate test fails), response validation code will be untested on gate. My question is how I should go on these- 1. Should I wait for implementation of Branchless tempest to complete? 2. OK to merge even this is going to be untested on gate. Thanks Ghanshyam Mann DISCLAIMER

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Checking for return codes in tempest client calls

-- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] custom gerrit dashboard - per project review inbox zero

Regards Ghanshyam Mann ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][nova] Status of v3 tests in tempest

Ghanshyam Mann On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:12 PM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote: On 05/19/2014 01:24 PM, Frittoli, Andrea (HP Cloud) wrote: Thanks for bringing this up. We won't be testing v3 in Juno, but we'll

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][nova] Status of v3 tests in tempest

I agree to continue work on bp/ nova-api-test-inheritance. As its reduce the duplication code and later will help to remove the V2 tests easily. V2.1 tests can be written on same design of inheritance. -- Thanks Ghanshyam Mann On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Kenichi Oomichi oomi

[openstack-dev] [qa] Issue in Tempest API's tests when running with nosetest command?

). To fix/stop these kind of issue, one solution is to have some policy for Tempest not to name non test function with test_, Test_ etc so that nose would not consider those as test case. Looking forward to have more opinions on this. -- Thanks Ghanshyam Mann

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Issue in Tempest API's tests when running with nosetest command?

idea. On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.orgwrote: On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:34:35AM +0900, GHANSHYAM MANN wrote: Tempest API’s XML test will run with 1 test failure when run with Nosetest. When we run the tempest with nosetest command (ex -nosetest –v

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [All] API standards working group

://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] No one replying on tempest issue?Please share your experience

Ghanshyam Mann ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Forming the API Working Group

___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Tempest] Proposing Ghanshyam Mann for Tempest Core

Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 7:58:06 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Tempest] Proposing Ghanshyam Mann for Tempest Core +1 Am 22.11.2014 um 15:51 schrieb Andrea Frittoli andrea.fritt...@gmail.com : +1 On 21 Nov 2014 18:25, Ken1 Ohmichi ken1ohmi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest] How to run tempest tests

___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday Jan 22nd at 22:00 UTC

to add an item to the agenda. To help people figure out what time 22:00 UTC is in other timezones tomorrow's meeting will be at: 18:00 EDT 07:00 JST 07:30 ACST 0:00 CEST 17:00 CDT 15:00 PDT -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Tempest Bug triage

-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin

[openstack-dev] [qa] Tempest Bug triage

. People who want to help in bug triage, feel free to put your name in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-rotation Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] what is our shipped paste.ini going to be for Kilo

...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] removal of v3 in tree testing

?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ

Re: [openstack-dev] removal of v3 in tree testing

. It looks something like - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162016/ -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/04/2015 07:48 PM, GHANSHYAM MANN wrote: Hi Sean, Yes having V3 directory/file names is very confusing now. But current v3

[openstack-dev] [Nova][QA] Use case of Nova to boot VM from volume only

config. 1- ERROR (BadRequest): Block Device Mapping is Invalid: You specified more local devices than the limit allows (HTTP 400) (Request-ID: req-3ef100c7- b5c5-4a2d-a5da-8344726336e2) -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann

[openstack-dev] [qa] Call to sign QA Bug Triage Rotation

free to put your name in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-rotation -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ

Re: [openstack-dev] In loving memory of Chris Yeoh

questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Tempest] Proposing Jordan Pittier for Tempest Core

) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [Nova] [Ironic] [Magnum] Microversion guideline in API-WG

/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [Nova] [Ironic] [Magnum] Microversion guideline in API-WG

?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [Nova] [Ironic] [Magnum] Microversion guideline in API-WG

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Dmitry Tantsur divius.ins...@gmail.com wrote: 26 июня 2015 г. 2:47 пользователь GHANSHYAM MANN ghanshyamm...@gmail.com написал: On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com wrote: Almost all of our discussions so far

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [Nova] [Ironic] [Magnum] Microversion guideline in API-WG

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Dmitry Tantsur divius.ins...@gmail.com wrote: 26 июня 2015 г. 2:48 пользователь GHANSHYAM MANN ghanshyamm...@gmail.com написал: On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry for late response here, 2015-06-20 9:14

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] change of day for API subteam meeting?

) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we combine a set of minor microversion bump needed fix into one microversoin bump?

__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we combine a set of minor microversion bump needed fix into one microversoin bump?

?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API: Question on 'Retry-After': 0 in HTTPForbidden

__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Why is osapi_v3.enabled = False by default?

(not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal to add Alex Xu to nova-core

ackalytics.com/?module=nova-group_id=xuhj=all > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [docs] Generating API samples

__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks Regards Ghanshyam Mann

[openstack-dev] Should v2 compatibility mode (v2.0 on v2.1) fixes be applicable for v2.1 too?

lient/+bug/1491325 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1491511 [2]: http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-compute-v2.1.html#attachVolume -- Thanks & Regards Ghanshyam Mann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday September 17th at 9:00 UTC

to the agenda. To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones, meeting will be at: 04:00 EDT 18:00 JST 18:30 ACST 11:00 CEST 04:00 CDT 02:00 PDT -- Thanks & Regards Ghanshyam Mann __ OpenStack Develop

[openstack-dev] Fwd: [QA] Meeting Thursday December 10th at 9:00 UTC

.280900_UTC.29 Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda. To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the next meeting will be at: 04:00 EST 18:00 JST 18:30 ACST 11:00 CEST 04:00 CDT 02:00 PDT -- Regards Ghanshyam Mann +81-8084200646

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest] clients/manager in plugins

r-m...@cq.jp.nec.com> wrote: > Hi Ghanshyam, > > > > Thanks for your response. > > It seems that I'm headed in the right direction. > > One more question. - Should we migrate from 'service_client' to 'rest_client' > in tempest-lib? > > > > Best regards, > Ryota >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest] clients/manager in plugins

__ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Regards Ghanshyam Mann +81-8084200646

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Tempest] Drop javelin off tempest

iew.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tempest+branch:master+topic:bp/consistent-service-method-names,n,z >> > > ______ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] does validation bug-fix require microversion bump?

; > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][tempest]Tempest test plugin and microversions

ck.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday June 16th at 9:00 UTC

.29 Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda. To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the next meeting will be at: 04:00 EST 18:00 JST 18:30 ACST 11:00 CEST 04:00 CDT 02:00 PDT Regards Ghanshyam Mann

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Question about redundant API samples tests for microversions

https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/api/compute/admin/test_keypairs_v210.py > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt Riedemann > > > __ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questio

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Tempest pre-provisioned credentials in the gate

Big +1 for that which makes pre-provisioned cred testing more thoroughly. And at the end we should divide the existing jobs among dynamic and pre-provisioned account so that we would not leave any of them less tested. Thanks gmann From: Andrea Frittoli [mailto:andrea.fritt...@gmail.com] Sent:

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday January 14th at 9:00 UTC

.280900_UTC.29 Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda. To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the next meeting will be at: 04:00 EST 18:00 JST 18:30 ACST 11:00 CEST 04:00 CDT 02:00 PDT Regards Ghanshyam Mann

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][nova][defcore] Add option to disable some strict response checking for interop testing

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:19:54PM -0700, Chris Hoge wrote: >> >> > On Jun 14, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Matthew Treinish >> > wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:57:05AM -0700, Chris Hoge

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday January 28th at 9:00 UTC

.280900_UTC.29 Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda. To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the next meeting will be at: 04:00 EST 18:00 JST 18:30 ACST 11:00 CEST 04:00 CDT 02:00 PDT Regards Ghanshyam Mann

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Should we signal backwards incompatible changes in microversions?

Regards Ghanshyam Mann On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Alex Xu <sou...@gmail.com> wrote: > If we support 2.x.y, when we bump 'x' is a problem. We didn't order the API > changes for now, the version of API change is just based on the order of > patch merge. For support 2.x.y,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][API] Does nova API allow the server_id parem as DB index?

/openstack/ec2-api Regards Ghanshyam Mann On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Anne Gentle <annegen...@justwriteclick.com > wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:03 PM, 少合冯 <lvmxhs...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I guess others may ask the same questions. >> >> I

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] deprecating Tempest stress framework

+1 Sounds good to separate those to different repo. Regards Ghanshyam Mann On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Matthew Treinish <mtrein...@kortar.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:21:53AM +0100, Koderer, Marc wrote: >> I know that there are folks around that are using it

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday March 10th at 9:00 UTC

.280900_UTC.29 Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda. To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the next meeting will be at: 04:00 EST 18:00 JST 18:30 ACST 11:00 CEST 04:00 CDT 02:00 PDT Regards Ghanshyam Mann

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Not running for PTL

Thanks Matt for your great leadership and hardwork around QA world. It has been great working in your leadership and provided a smooth & cool environment during those period. There lot of key things we achieved and with diversity of ideas. You have been always very active and present to help

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova PTL for Newton

Thanks a lot John for great leadership and all achievements. You have been very encouraging and helpful always. Regards Ghanshyam Mann On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 4:22 AM, John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com> wrote: > Hi, > > It has been greatly rewarding serving you all a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Fix nova swap volume (updating an attached volume) function

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 3/30/2016 8:20 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> >> >> >> On 3/30/2016 7:56 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 3/30/2016 7:38 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 2/25/2016 5:31 AM,

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday April 7th at 9:00 UTC

.280900_UTC.29 Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda. To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the next meeting will be at: 04:00 EST 18:00 JST 18:30 ACST 11:00 CEST 04:00 CDT 02:00 PDT Regards Ghanshyam Mann

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][tempest] disabling 'full' tempest tests for ceilometer changes in CI

+1, That make sense. Also as Ceilometer and Aodh will be running tests from plugin, I have initiated patch to remove those from Tempest. - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304992/ Regards Ghanshyam Mann +818011120698 On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Chris Dent <cdent...@anticdent.org>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Issues with Tox testing

configuration in detail- http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tempest/configuration.html Regards Ghanshyam Mann On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Anusha Ramineni <anusha.ii...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Bryan, > > Yes, tempest can be run outside devstack deployments. Please check the &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > 2016-03-17 4:05 GMT-07:00 Andrea Frittoli : >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:57 AM Ken'ichi Ohmichi >> wrote: >>> >>> 2016-03-16 19:41 GMT-07:00 Jim Rollenhagen

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Kairat Kushaev wrote: > > Also curious about this. It seems weird to separate the 'positive' and > the 'negative' ones, assuming those patches are mostly contributed by > the same group of developers. > > > Yeah, agree. This approach leads

Re: [openstack-dev] [jacket] Introduction to jacket, a new project

redirect API services at top level top and do what all conversion, consume difference etc. [1] https://github.com/aviator/aviator Regards Ghanshyam Mann On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:58 PM, zs <okay22m...@163.com> wrote: > Hi Gordon, > > Thank you for your suggestion. > > I thin

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday March 24th at 9:00 UTC

.280900_UTC.29 Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda. To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the next meeting will be at: 04:00 EST 18:00 JST 18:30 ACST 11:00 CEST 04:00 CDT 02:00 PDT Regards Ghanshyam Mann

Re: [openstack-dev] FW: Regarding code debug information

://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/ Regards Ghanshyam Mann On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Shashi Kant <shashi.k...@nectechnologies.in> wrote: > Dear All, > > > > I am newbie for openstack development and trying to understand the flow > using code base. > > As the code base

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API priorities in Newton

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 03:26:13PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: >> During the Nova API meeting we had some conversations about priorities, >> but this feels like the thing where a mailing list conversation is more >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Fix nova swap volume (updating an attached volume) function

that on tempest patch. ..[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/299830/1 On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > On 3/30/2016 9:14 PM, GHANSHYAM MANN wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Matt Riedemann >> &

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday April 21st at 9:00 UTC

Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda. To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the next meeting will be at: 04:00 EST 18:00 JST 18:30 ACST 11:00 CEST 04:00 CDT 02:00 PDT Regards Ghanshyam Mann

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday July 28th at 9:00 UTC

.280900_UTC.29 Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda. To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the next meeting will be at: 04:00 EST 18:00 JST 18:30 ACST 11:00 CEST 04:00 CDT 02:00 PDT Thanks & Regards, Ghanshyam

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next steps for proxy API deprecation

> -Original Message- > From: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org] > Sent: 27 July 2016 02:36 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next steps for proxy API deprecation > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] When do we need tests for microversions in Tempest?

Thanks Matt for bringing this up. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > There are several changes in Tempest right now trying to add response schema > validation for the 2.26 microversion which added server tags to the server > GET response. This

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] When do we need tests for microversions in Tempest?

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 09:55:33PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> There are several changes in Tempest right now trying to add response schema >> validation for the 2.26 microversion which added server tags to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some thoughts on API microversions

> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Laski [mailto:and...@lascii.com] > Sent: 04 August 2016 22:18 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some thoughts on API microversions > > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016, at 08:20 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > > On

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday June 30th at 9:00 UTC

.280900_UTC.29 Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda. Sorry for delay in mail. To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the next meeting will be at: 04:00 EST 18:00 JST 18:30 ACST 11:00 CEST 04:00 CDT 02:00 PDT Thanks & Regards, Ghanshyam

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Announcing my candidacy for PTL of the Pike cycle

ween the QA team > and a project team: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1656183, > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/420038/, > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425487/ > > I have myself no strong opinion on the matter, that why I need a leader > here :) > > Note,

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday Jan 9th at 9:00 UTC

Hello everyone, Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be Thursday, Jan 9th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. The agenda for the meeting can be found here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Device tag in the API breaks in the old microversion

Thanks Alex for writing in details. On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Alex Xu wrote: > Unfortunately the device tag support in the API was broken in the old > Microversion https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1658571, which thanks > to Kevin Zheng to find out that. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Device tag in the API breaks in the old microversion

Sorry, forgot to mention tempest patch - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424572/1 (but broken cases seems clear without that patch also) Regards Ghanshyam Mann +818011120698 On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Ghanshyam Mann <ghanshyamm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Alex for writing i

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] The status of servers API's filters

On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > > > 2017-01-29 1:31 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > >> On 1/27/2017 3:37 AM, Alex Xu wrote: >> >>> The patches about validation the filters and sorts for servers API are >>> merged [0]. But we still have

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday Jan 26th at 9:00 UTC

Hello everyone, Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be Thursday, Jan 26th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. The agenda for the meeting can be found here: *

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Device tag in the API breaks in the old microversion

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 1/24/2017 2:05 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > >> Unfortunately the device tag support in the API was broken in the old >> Microversion https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1658571, which thanks >> to Kevin Zheng to find out

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Tempest Stable plugin interface change broke gate

> -Original Message- > From: Hayes, Graham [mailto:graham.ha...@hpe.com] > Sent: 23 February 2017 03:25 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Tempest Stable plugin interface change >

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] The end-user test suite for OpenStack clusters

r destructive testing of OpenStack cloud is on > review > >> [1]. > >> 2) The spec for a new framework which will focus on HA/failover and > >> destructive testing is no review [2]. > >> 3) The commit for the new repository is on review [3] as well. > >

[openstack-dev] [QA] Announcing my candidacy for PTL of the Pike cycle

Hi All, First and foremost would like to wish you all a successful 2017 ahead and with this I'm announcing my PTL candidacy of the Quality Assurance team for the Pike release cycle. I am glad to work in OpenStack community and would like to thank all the contributors who supported me to

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][glance] gate-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph-plugin-src-glance_store-ubuntu-xenial failures

Yea, manage snapshot tests should be skipped on ceph backend. I disabled those tests for *-ceph-* jobs and glance-store will be unblocked after that merged. - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421073/ There is discussion going on whether to enable the manage snapshot false by default on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Marking Tintri driver as unsupported

Or how about just disable the flag which will skip snapshot manage tests for CI where it should not run. Flag in Devtsack is TEMPEST_VOLUME_MANAGE_SNAPSHOT which can be set to False on CI. I added the same on ceph gate jobs [1] and similarly can be added on CI side if ok? ..1

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Different length limit for tags in object definition and db model definition

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Alex Xu wrote: > > > 2017-01-17 10:26 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > >> On 1/16/2017 7:12 PM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: >> >>> Hi Nova, >>> >>> I just discovered something interesting, the tag has a limited length, >>> and in

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] PTL non-candidacy

Thanks Kenichi for all your hardwork and nice leadership. Its been very good and lot of things we finished under your leadership. You managed all the activities in a very cool and polite way (Japanese style :)). ​-gmann On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do not recheck changes until 422709 is merged

For other failure on "expected_attr" error, we need this to merge - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/422323/ on nova side. -gmann > -Original Message- > From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mriede...@gmail.com] > Sent: 20 January 2017 12:17 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA]Refactoring Scenarios manager.py

Yea, there is no doubt we should refactor scenario tests but even those are internal interface it breaks plugins. We can argue that plugins should not be using those but before that tempest should have all required interface/class/helper as stable interface for plugins. which is what scenario

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA]Refactoring Scenarios manager.py

Doing gradual refactoring and fixing plugins time to time needs lot of wait and sync. That needs: 1. Plugins to switch from current method usage. Plugins to have some other function or same copy paste code what current scenario base class has. 2. Tempest patch to wait for plugin fix. 3. Plugins

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday Sept 8th at 9:00 UTC

.280900_UTC.29 Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda. To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the next meeting will be at: 04:00 EST 18:00 JST 18:30 ACST 11:00 CEST 04:00 CDT 02:00 PDT Thanks & Regards, Ghanshyam

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday Oct 20th at 9:00 UTC

Hello everyone, Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be Thursday, Oct 20th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. The agenda for the meeting can be found here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Stepping back

Thanks a lot alaski for your incredible contribution in Nova. You were a great learning guide and mentor. Very best of luck for your new responsibility and hoping to work together in community again. Thanks & Regards, gmann > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Laski

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday Nov 17th at 9:00 UTC

Hello everyone, Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be Thursday, Nov 17th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. The agenda for the meeting can be found here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] The end-user test suite for OpenStack clusters

I like os-faults library which can provide the abstraction over different destructive actions like reboot/poweroff node etc. But not much clear about Stepler that what all tests it will contain. Tempest do have scenario tests which can hit the production env with significant way of testing

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara][qa] Unblocking Sahara gate

do not prefer of adding the automapping in tempest side. [1] will fix the issue and unblock the sahara tests. And I saw sahara plugin is also branchless so should be ok with just this patch ? ..1 - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385701/ Thanks & Regards, Ghanshyam Mann > -O

[openstack-dev] [Infra][heat][QA] Tempest layer4 job failure due to heat devstack plugin switch.

Hi All, Recently all gate heat gate jobs were switched to use heat devstack plugin and heat code was removed from devstack tree. During that tempest layer 4 job is missed and blocked the tempest gate[1]. Also another heat job had issue for enabling plugin [2]. Fixes are up for both job fix,

  1   2   3   4   >