On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Hi everyone,
With the incredible growth of OpenStack, our development community is
facing complex challenges. How we handle those might determine the
ultimate success or failure of OpenStack.
With this cycle we hit
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
Hi!
James has run into an issue implementing the multi-hypervisor spec
(
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tripleo-specs/tree/specs/juno/tripleo-juno-deploy-cloud-hypervisor-type.rst
)
which we're hoping
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Dina Belova has recently landed some infra patches[1,2] to create
an experimental mongodb-based Tempest job. This effectively just
overrides the ceilometer storage backend config so that mongodb
is
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 09:06 -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 08/07/2014 08:06 PM, Michael Still wrote:
It seems to me that the tension here is that there are groups who
would really like to use features in newer
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Ignoring the question of is it ok to say: 'to run ceilometer in any sort
of
non-trivial deployment you must manager yet another underlying service,
mongodb' I would prefer not adding an addition gate variant to all
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Ignoring the question of is it ok to say
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/12/2014 10:56 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey
(Terrible name for a policy, I know)
From the version_cap saga here:
https://review.openstack.org/110754
I think we need a better understanding of how to approach
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Aug 12, 2014, at 1:44 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Kyle Mestery mest
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 15:25 -0700, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 09:06 -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 08
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/13/2014 04:05 AM, Michael Still wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
It seems like this is exactly what the slots give us, though. The core
review
team picks a
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 09:30 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
While I definitely think re-balancing our quality responsibilities back
into the projects will provide an overall better release, I think it's
going to take a
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Just wanted to quickly weigh in with my thoughts on this important
topic. I
very much valued the face-to-face interaction that came from the
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:24:36AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
I'm not questioning the value of f2f - I'm questioning the idea of
doing f2f
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Aug 13, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
At the end of the day, that's probably going to mean saying No to more
things. Everytime I turn around everyone wants the TC to say No to
.
Joe Gordon suggests we need a spec to bring the driver back into Nova.
Besides the fact that specs are closed and there is no intention of
reintegrating the driver for Juno, I'm uncertain of proposing a spec
without first having solid history of successful testing, especially
given
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com
wrote:
On 8/14/2014 6:42 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 14, 2014, at 4:41 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Aug 13, 2014
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Additional cross-project resources can be ponied up by the large
contributor companies, and existing cross-project resources are not
necessarily divertable on command.
Sure additional cross-project resources can
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Additional cross-project resources can be ponied up by the large
contributor companies, and existing cross-project resources are not
necessarily divertable on command.
Sure additional cross-project resources can
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Let me try to say it another way. You seemed to say that it wasn't much
to ask given the rate at which things happen in
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/18/2014 06:18 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Let me try to say it another way. You seemed to say that it wasn't
much
to
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:18:16PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
Let me try to say it another way. You seemed to say
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Jay Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net
wrote:
+2
I prefer the LOG.warning format and support that given the documentation
you shared.
If there is agreement I would create a hacking check.
I think a better approach is to just not care which i used here.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
Minesweeper is back up and running – this is now called “Vmware NSX CI”.
A patch for the deprecation of the ESX driver resulted in endless
Minesweeper failures (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108854/). These
were
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:31:48PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews
seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting.
I'd like
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/19/2014 05:31 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews
seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting.
I'd like to propose that we adopt
On Aug 19, 2014 10:45 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nikola Đipanov [mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com]
Sent: 19 August 2014 17:50
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Scheduler split wrt Extensible
Resource
On Aug 20, 2014 10:56 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
On 18 August 2014 11:18, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Let me try to say it another way. You seemed to say that it
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 09:02:17AM -0700, Armando M. wrote:
Hi folks,
According to [1], we have ways to introduce external references to commit
messages.
These are useful to mark certain patches and their
On Aug 24, 2014 9:04 AM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday, August 24, 2014, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote:
I'm following this as well since I have the exact same problem in a
docstring patch for heat.
Keystone saw an oddity with the new sample config
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote:
In the Thoughts on the patch test failure rate and moving forward
thread[1] there's discussion of moving some of the burden for
functional testing to the individual projects. This seems like a good
idea to me, but also seems
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Joe Gordon wrote:
[Other stuff snipped, thanks for that, good to have some pointers.]
Why can't you run devstack locally? Maybe there are some changes we can
make so its easier to run devstack
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:57 AM, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
While I cannot speak for the dynamics of the tripleo team, if this were
to
be adopted in nova I would not +2 any blueprints as I don't
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Wang Shen ws1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, All
I have done some work to test the performance of LUN scanning, use
iscsiadm with --rescan like what Nova dose. In my test, a host
connected with a lot of LUNs , more than 1000 LUNs. Because --rescan
will cause kernel
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
Additional cross-project resources can be ponied up by the large
contributor companies, and existing cross-project resources are not
necessarily divertable on command.
Sure additional cross-project
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote:
Hi stackers,
It goes without saying that end users, that are actually using your
tool/project/service, usually don't have enough time to join community,
understand all technical details and road map of project and
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 08/28/2014 12:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 27, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 08/27/2014 05:27 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 27, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:04:57AM +, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
I'll try and not whine about my pet project but I do think there
is a problem here. For the Gantt project to split out the scheduler
there is a
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh alan.kavan...@ericsson.com
wrote:
I share Donald's points here, I believe what would help is to clearly
describe in the Wiki the process and workflow for the BP approval process
and build in this process how to deal with
We just finished discussing when to open up Kilo specs at the nova meeting
today [0], and Kilo specs will open right after we cut Juno RC1 (around
Sept 25th [1]). Additionally, the spec template will most likely be revised.
We still have a huge amount of work to do for Juno and the nova team is
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com
wrote:
On 08/28/2014 04:01 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh
alan.kavan...@ericsson.com mailto:alan.kavan...@ericsson.com wrote:
I share Donald's points here, I believe what
On Aug 29, 2014 10:42 AM, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com
wrote:
Well, I think that there is a sign of a broken (or at least bent) process
and that's what I'm trying to expose. Especially given the ongoing
conversations over Gantt it seems wrong that ultimately it was rejected due
to
.
The goal of this exercise is to help us see if our individual world views
align with the greater community, and to get the ball rolling on a larger
discussion of where as a project we should be focusing more time.
best,
Joe Gordon
[0]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-August
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com
wrote:
TL; DR
A few folks are proposing to stop running tests for neutron advanced
services [ie: (lb|vpn|fw)aas] in the integrated gate, and run them only on
the neutron gate.
Reason: projects like nova are 100%
to Dan Berrange's position, votes -2. Some
debate between Dan and Dan continues. Joe Gordon votes +2. Matt
Riedemann expresses support-in-principal for Dan Smith's approach.
= July 15 =
Debate continues ...
16:12 - I -2 the patch and attempt to take a step back and think about
how we could have
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/02/2014 09:23 PM, Michael Still wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 09/02/2014 08:16 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi.
We're soon to hit feature freeze, as
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com wrote:
I will follow up with a more detailed email about what I believe we are
missing, once the FF settles and I have applied some soothing creme to
my burnout wounds, but currently my sentiment is:
Contributing features to
not only removes 3k LOC, but fixes 4 bugs(see commit message
for more details) and provides relevant, stable common db code.
Main maintainers of oslo.db(Roman Podoliaka and Victor Sergeyev) are OK
with this.
Joe Gordon and Matt Riedemann are already signing up, so we need one
more vote from
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 2:23 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
Sorry for another top post, but I like how Nikola has pulled this
problem apart, and wanted to respond directly to his response.
On 3 September 2014 10:50, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
The reason many
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
Position statement
==
Over the past year I've increasingly come to the conclusion that
Nova is heading for (or probably already at) a major crisis. If
steps are not taken to avert this, the project
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/04/2014 10:25 PM, Solly Ross wrote:
Anyway, I think it would be useful to have some sort of page where people
could say I'm an SME in X, ask me for reviews and then patch
submitters could go
and say, oh, I
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Mike Wilson geekinu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am requesting an exception for the juno-slaveification blueprint. There
is a single outstanding patch [1] which has already been approved before,
but needed to be re-spun due to gate failures which then
Hi All,
We have recently started seeing assorted memory issues in the gate
including the oom-killer [0] and libvirt throwing memory errors [1].
Luckily we run ps and dstat on every devstack run so we have some insight
into why we are running out of memory. Based on the output from job taken
at
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
As you all know, there has recently been several very active discussions
around how to improve assorted aspects of our development process. One idea
that was brought up is to come up with a list of cycle goals/project
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Kurt Griffiths
kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi folks,
In this second round of performance testing, I benchmarked the new Redis
driver. I used the same setup and tests as in Round 1 to make it easier to
compare the two drivers. I did not test Redis in
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:23:34AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
a) Sorting out the common code is already accounted for in Dan B's
original
On Sep 15, 2014 8:31 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/15/2014 08:07 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-09-15 17:59:10 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote:
[...]
Sometimes it's pretty hard to determine whether something in the
E-R check page is due to something in the infra scripts,
in the sense of OpenStack Tenants/Project-ID's or
in the sense of “clients/workers”? For the latter case, the pilot tests
I’ve done so far used multiple clients (though not graphed), but in the
former case only one “project” was used.
multiple Tenant/Project-IDs
From: Joe Gordon joe.gord
Hi All,
My understanding of Zaqar is that it's like SQS. SQS uses distributed
queues, which have a few unusual properties [0]:
Message Order
Amazon SQS makes a best effort to preserve order in messages, but due to
the distributed nature of the queue, we cannot guarantee you will receive
messages
Postgres is also logging a lot of errors:
http://logs.openstack.org/63/122263/1/check/check-tempest-dsvm-postgres-full/2f27252/logs/postgres.txt.gz
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Clark Boylan cboy...@sapwetik.org wrote:
Hello,
Recent sampling of test run times shows that our tempest jobs
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
Hi.
Is time to start identifying (and working on) release critical bugs in
nova before we ship RC1.
My initial position is that any critical bug is release critical.
There are currently critical bugs not targeted to
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/18/2014 04:24 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Great job highlighting what our friends over at Amazon are doing.
It's clear from
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/18/2014 04:09 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/18/2014 12:31 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/17/2014 10:36 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
My understanding of Zaqar is that it's like SQS. SQS uses distributed
queues, which
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/09/14 10:11, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/19/2014 09:13 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
SQS offers very, very limited guarantees, and it's clear that the reason
for that is to make it massively, massively scalable in the way
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/09/14 17:06, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/09/14 10:11, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/19/2014 09:13 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
SQS offers very, very
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/09/14 17:06, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/09/14 10:11, Gordon Sim wrote
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2014-09-22 19:04:03 -0700:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/09/14 17:06, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Zane
way to build the list.
Joe Gordon mentioned an interesting idea to address this (which I am
probably totally butchering), which is that we make incubation more similar
to the ASF Incubator. In other words make it more lightweight with no
promise of governance or infrastructure support.
you
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/09/14 22:04, Joe Gordon wrote:
To me this is less about valid or invalid choices. The Zaqar team is
comparing Zaqar to SQS, but after digging into the two of them, zaqar
barely looks like SQS. Zaqar doesn't
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/23/2014 05:13 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2014-09-22 19:04:03 -0700:
[snip]
To me this is less about valid or invalid choices. The Zaqar team is
comparing Zaqar to SQS, but
On Dec 10, 2013 2:37 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 6 December 2013 21:56, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey there,
thanks Rob for keeping eye on this. Speaking for myself, as current
non-coder it was very hard to keep pace with others, especially
On Dec 10, 2013 7:00 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2013-12-10 08:15:15 -0800:
Guys,
I see two major trends in the thread:
* use Salt
* write our own solution with architecture similar to Salt or
MCollective
There were
On Dec 10, 2013 7:38 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Yup, IMHO this is where the rally[1] project, and others that attempt to
push the boundaries are really helping openstack become much better around
these types of issues. At yahoo! in a short-time it will not be that
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
On 12/11/13 12:43 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 4:17:45 PM, Maithem Munshed 71510 wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering, what is the reason behind having nova audit
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
On 12/12/2013 7:20 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
Current Gate Length: 12hrs*, 41 deep
(top of gate entered 12hrs ago)
It's been an *exciting* week this week. For people not paying attention
we had 2 external events
On Dec 18, 2013 6:38 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
The weekly Nova meeting [1] has been held on Thursdays at 2100 UTC.
I've been getting some requests to offer an alternative meeting time.
I'd like to try out alternating the meeting time between two different
times
Please read
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
Hi guys,
We have a couple of bug fix patches that already received a +2 review
waiting since some time for
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In Icehouse development, do we have some guidelines for nova api change?
If I want to make some changes for nova api, do I need to update both v2
and v3 or just v3?
For every new extension to the v2 API we require
2013/12/27 Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In Icehouse development, do we have some guidelines for nova api
change? If I want to make some changes for nova api, do I need to update
both v2 and v3 or just v3
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 8:45 AM, John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.comwrote:
Hey Everyone,
I wanted to see where we stand on IDE extensions in .gitignore files.
We seem to have some back and forth, one cycle there's a bug and a
patch to add things like eclipse, idea etc and the next
A little late, but here is the patch to put this into hacking.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64584/
And here is it running against nova:
http://logs.openstack.org/84/64584/1/check/gate-hacking-integration-nova/b31c47e/console.html
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 17:04 +0100, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
I have already discussed the matter with Jay on IRC, even if for a
different issue.
In this specific case 'batching' will have the benefit of reducing the
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 08:58 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 17:04 +0100, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
I have already
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 09:56 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
What about it? Also those numbers are pretty old at this point. I was
thinking disable rootwrap and run full parallel tempest against it.
I think that is a little
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/03/2014 09:44 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Tim Bell wrote:
Is there a mechanism to tag changes as being
Overall this looks really good, and very spot on.
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
A lot of elastic recheck this fall has been based on the ad hoc needs of
the moment, in between diving down into the race bugs that were uncovered
by it. This week away from it
Everything sounds good!
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/06/2014 07:04 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
Overall this looks really good, and very spot on.
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
A lot
On Jan 8, 2014 7:12 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that we add another item to the list here [1] that is
basically related to what happens when the 3rd party CI job votes a -1 on
your patch. This would include:
1. Documentation on how to analyze the
Hi All,
As you know the gate has been in particularly bad shape (gate queue over
100!) this week due to a number of factors. One factor is how many major
outstanding bugs we have in the gate. Below is a list of the top 4 open
gate bugs.
Here are some fun facts about this list:
* All bugs have
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Kurt Taylor krtay...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote on 01/08/2014 12:40:47 PM:
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] new (docs) requirement for third party CI
On Jan 8, 2014 7:12 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hope you don't mind, I'll jump in here :)
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:08 -0800, Nachi Ueno wrote:
Hi Jeremy
Don't
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:34 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Jay Pipes
On Jan 13, 2014 3:42 PM, Lyle, David david.l...@hp.com wrote:
With all the warranted meeting time shuffling that has been happening
recently, and the addition of so many projects and sub-teams, the meeting
calendar for #openstack-meeting and #openstack-meeting-alt [1] is
relatively full. So
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
[1]
https://www.google.com/calendar/ical/bj05mroquq28jhud58esggq...@group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics
Is this calendar periodically pruned of dead meetings (for some
definition
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com
wrote:
All-
I want to clear up some confusion I’m seeing in the reviews of these
syncup patches. These patches merely bring recent changes from the nova
tree over to the gantt tree. There is no attempt to
, that leaves 3 possibly dead meetings.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
[1]
https://www.google.com/calendar/ical/bj05mroquq28jhud58esggq
no matter how we do it.
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
*From:* Joe Gordon [mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:21 AM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Jesse Noller
jesse.nol...@rackspace.comwrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 9:07 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Jesse Noller
jesse.nol...@rackspace.comwrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 5:53 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah chmo
, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Jesse Noller
jesse.nol...@rackspace.comwrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 5:53 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@enovance.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Chris Jones c...@tenshu.net wrote:
Once a common
including it to all client projects. However such
approach this period can take unknown amount of time and can be easily
failed during integration stage cause requirements change or some other
reason.
Please let me know what you think.
Best Regards,
Alexei
On 01/16/2014 08:16 PM, Joe Gordon
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 18:43 +0400, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
Hi Sean,
I think the following 2 commits in neutron are essential for bringing
neutron jobs back to acceptable level of failure rate:
1 - 100 of 778 matches
Mail list logo
