Re: [openstack-dev] Nova CI Infrastructure

Hi, It looks like your patch ran with no problems. The only fail is a non voting test which means that it's not reliable. You should be good on the CI side, just need to wait to get reviews for your patch. Thanks Mohammed Sent from my iPhone On Mar 16, 2015, at 1:05 AM, kwon-ho lee

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [puppet][fuel][packstack][tripleo] puppet 3 end of life

Just a bit of feedback on our side: We have been using Puppet 4 for quite sometime from the Puppetlabs repos without any issues. The OpenStack modules all work fine for us and I haven't ran into any issues around other modules having any major Puppet 4 compatibility issues. Sent from my

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [OpenStack][Release] Migration problem from icehouse to newton

Hi Thierno, There is not, the supported upgrade path is going version by version till the one you want (in your case, Icehouse -> Juno -> Kilo - > Liberty -> Mitaka -> Newton).. Good luck! Mohammed > On Dec 8, 2016, at 8:44 AM, Thierno Diop wrote: > > Hello

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] [placement] Which service is using port 8778?

We use virtual hosts, haproxy runs on our VIP at port 80 and port 443 (SSL) (with keepalived to make sure it’s always running) and we use `use_backend` to send to the appropriate backend, more information here:

[openstack-dev] [elections] [puppet] Candidacy for Puppet OpenStack PTL (Queens)

, as this is for the benefit of all of us. Sincerely, Mohammed Naser (mnaser) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][infra] Help needed! high gate failure rate

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 07:22:42PM +0530, Rabi Mishra wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Rabi Mishra wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Ian Wienand

[openstack-dev] [puppet][tripleo] Gates broken, avoid rechecks

Hi everyone, Just a quick heads up that at the moment, there is an issue in the TripleO CI which is in the process of being fixed at the moment: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1717545 As certain Puppet modules gate for TripleO, please don't recheck changes that have failing jobs which

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [tripleo] Making containerized service deployment the default

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > Hey ops & devs, > > We talked about containers extensively at the PTG and one of the items > that needs to be addressed is that currently we still deploy the > services as bare metal services via puppet. For Queens we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Should we make rebuild + new image on a volume-backed instance fail fast?

o that should >> be considered. >> >> -- >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matt >> >> __ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.opens

[openstack-dev] [tc][election] TD candidacy (mnaser)

to all other candidates. Regards, Mohammed Naser __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] TC Candidates: what does an OpenStack user look like?

Hi Zane, Thank you for your question. I think you're raising a critical question which we must all come to (fairly relative) agreement to so that we can all build OpenStack in the same direction. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > (Reminder: we are in

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] TC Candidates: what does an OpenStack user look like?

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Zane Bitter <zbit...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 12/10/17 15:07, Mohammed Naser wrote: >> >> Hi Zane, >> >> Thank you for your question. I think you're raising a critical >> question which we must all come to (fairly relative) a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mohammed Naser — vexxhost

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > In the past year or so, has there been anything that made you think “I wish > the TC would do something about that!” ? If so, what was it, and what would > you have wanted the TC to do about it? This is great and the timing of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Ed Leafe <e...@leafe.com> wrote: > On Oct 12, 2017, at 8:10 PM, Mohammed Naser <mna...@vexxhost.com> wrote: > >> I think that the OpenStack infrastructure team is doing a wonderful >> job at keeping such a huge CI system working

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Proposing Alfredo Moralejo core on puppet-openstack-integration

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Alfredo has been doing an incredible work on maintaining Puppet > OpenStack CI; by always testing OpenStack from trunk and taking care > of issues. He has been involved in fixing the actual CI problems in > OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Add Mohammed Naser to cores

Thank you for the kind words everyone! :) On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > I think it's not unreasonable to give core rights to the PTL :) > > > On 09/05/2017 05:42 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: >> >> Hey folks, >> >> I'm writing to ask that we add mnaser

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Update on Zuul v3 Migration - and what to do about issues

Hi Vega, Please check the document. Some jobs were migrated with incorrect nodesets and have to be switched to multinode in the job definition in openstack-zuul-jobs Good luck Mohammed Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 30, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Vega Cai wrote: > > Hi, > > In

[openstack-dev] [puppet] avoid rechecks

Hi everyone, As the Puppet modules CI is still in the process of getting plumbed properly with Zuul v3, you'll notice many of your checks failing. If you notice a job that has a legacy- prefix, it is probably not migrated yet and will likely fail, therefore, I'd avoid a recheck to avoid taking

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [kolla][puppet][openstack-ansible][tripleo] Better way to run wsgi service.

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > We are moving to deploy service via WSGI[0]. > > There are two recommended ways. > > - apache + mod_wsgi > - nginx + uwsgi > > later one is more better. > > For traditional deployment, it is easy to implement. Use

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [kolla][puppet][openstack-ansible][tripleo] Better way to run wsgi service.

was measurably faster with nginx proxying >> to a uwsgi socket. >> >> This was just my experience with it, if you do want to switch to >> uwsgi+http make sure you do thorough testing of all the components or you >> may be left with a component that just won't work with your m

[openstack-dev] [neutron][puppet] mod_wsgi support (pike bug?)

eck/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario004-tempest-ubuntu-xenial/791523c/logs/etc/neutron/plugins/ > > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Mohammed Naser <mna...@vexxhost.com> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Mohammed Naser <mna...@vexxhost.com> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][puppet] mod_wsgi support (pike bug?)

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Mohammed Naser <mna...@vexxhost.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Kevin Benton <ke...@benton.pub> wrote: >> Yes, unfortunately I didn't make it back to the patch in time to adjust >> devstack to dump all of the configura

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][puppet] mod_wsgi support (pike bug?)

by the Neutron team in coordination with the distribution packagers. > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Mohammed Naser <mna...@vexxhost.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Kevin Benton <ke...@benton.pub> wrote: >> > Yes, unfortunately I d

[openstack-dev] [puppet] pike + xenial gate unblocking

Hi folks, It looks like the new release of Pike has introduced a few problems in our Xenial gates, I spent much of this Saturday figuring out what's going on and I'd like to ask the cores to take the time to review these few patches so we can clear out the gates. puppet-ceph: add ceph-mgr

[openstack-dev] [neutron] mod_wsgi support (pike bug?)

Hi folks, I've attempted to enable mod_wsgi support in our dev environment with Puppet however it results in a traceback. I figured it was an environment thing so I looked into moving the Puppet CI to test using mod_wsgi and it resulted in the same error.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] mod_wsgi support (pike bug?)

On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Matthew Treinish <mtrein...@kortar.org> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 01:47:24PM -0400, Mohammed Naser wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I've attempted to enable mod_wsgi support in our dev environment with >> Puppet however it r

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] mod_wsgi support (pike bug?)

On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Mohammed Naser <mna...@vexxhost.com> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Matthew Treinish <mtrein...@kortar.org> wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 01:47:24PM -0400, Mohammed Naser wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][puppet-ceph]

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:15 AM, Emil Enemærke wrote: > Hi, > > I have stated using the puppet-ceph module for deploying ceph, and have > noticed a heavy use of exec in fx define 'ceph::osd' > (https://github.com/openstack/puppet-ceph/blob/master/manifests/osd.pp). Is > there a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][puppet] Release of openstack/puppet-magnum failed

Sorry for the top post, looks like it was puppet-magnum that might be missing adding “puppet” to its bindep file. I’ll look into this shortly Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 13, 2017, at 9:57 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from zuul's message of 2017-11-13

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][qa][ubuntu][neutron] Xenial Neutron Timeouts

Hi everyone, Thank you so much for the work on this, I'm sure we can progress with this together. I have noticed that this only occurs in master and never in the stable branches. Also, it only occurs under Ubuntu (so maybe something related to mod_wsgi version?) Given that we don't have any

[openstack-dev] [puppet][ci] PTI jobs for Puppet modules

Hi everyone, With a few languages getting PTI jobs which are defined in project-config, I think Puppet should be a candidate as the build and release process of Puppet modules is the same across all modules. Given that Puppet OpenStack has a large number of modules, in addition to Infra's puppet

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][qa][ubuntu][neutron] Xenial Neutron Timeouts

be really sad if we had to drop Ubuntu/Debian support because we cannot test it. I think there are a lot of users out there using it! I'd be more than happy to provide any assistance/information in troubleshooting this. Thank you, Mohammed On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Mohammed Naser <

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][qa][ubuntu][neutron] Xenial Neutron Timeouts

Jens, That's quite an interesting catch. I'm reaching out to the author of this change to get some more information. Thanks, Mohammed On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Jens Harbott <j.harb...@x-ion.de> wrote: > 2017-11-14 16:29 GMT+00:00 Mohammed Naser <mna...@vexxhost.com>:

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][qa][ubuntu][neutron] Xenial Neutron Timeouts

openstack.org/47/514347/1/check/puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario001-tempest-ubuntu-xenial/ed5a657/logs/neutron/neutron-server.txt.gz > has some tracebacks that look config related, possible missing DB table? > But I haven't looked very closely. > > -Brian > > > On Octob

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][qa][ubuntu][neutron] Xenial Neutron Timeouts

config issues is the fact that this happens intermittently (though, often enough that we had to switch it to non-voting). If it was a config issue, it would constantly and always fail. Thank you Brian & Matthew for your help so far. > -Brian > > >> On October 31, 2017 1:25:5

[openstack-dev] [puppet][qa][ubuntu][neutron] Xenial Neutron Timeouts

Hi everyone, I'm looking for some help regarding an issue that we're having with the Puppet OpenStack modules, we've had very inconsistent failures in the Xenial with the following error:

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Gerrit issues

Hi Gary, It looks like Gerrit is having some issues indeed and they are getting worked on at the moment. Thanks, Mohammed On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone else experience problems accessing gerrit? > > Thanks > > Gary > > >

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Ubuntu problems + Help needed

Hi everyone, I'll get right into the point. At the moment, the Puppet OpenStack modules don't have much contributors which can help maintain the Ubuntu support. We deploy on CentOS (so we try to get all the fixes in that we can) and there is a lot of activity from the TripleO team as well which

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][goals] tracking status of old goals for new projects

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > There is a patch to update the Python 3.5 goal for Kolla [1]. While > I'm glad to see the work happening, the change adds a new deliverable > to an old goal, and it isn’t clear whether we want to use that > approach for

Re: [openstack-dev] [sdk] issues with using OpenStack SDK Python client

ll copies of this > message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via > email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the > presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused > by any virus transmitted b

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Proposing Tobias Urdin to join Puppet OpenStack core

Hi everyone, I'm proposing that we add Tobias Urdin to the core Puppet OpenStack team as they've been putting great reviews over the past few months and they have directly contributed in resolving all the Ubuntu deployment issues and helped us bring Ubuntu support back and make the jobs voting

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Proposing Tobias Urdin to join Puppet OpenStack core

emil...@redhat.com> wrote: >> +1, thanks Tobias for your contributions! >> >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 8:21 AM, Iury Gregory <iurygreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018, 12:15 Mohammed Naser <mna...@vexxhost

Re: [openstack-dev] Puppet debugging help?

_ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mohammed

[openstack-dev] [tc] Organizational diversity tag

Hi everyone! During the TC retrospective at the OpenStack summit last week, the topic of the organizational diversity tag is becoming irrelevant was brought up by Thierry (ttx)[1]. It seems that for projects that are not very active, they can easily lose this tag with a few changes by perhaps

[openstack-dev] [tc] StarlingX project status update

Hi everyone: Over the past week in the summit, there was a lot of discussion regarding StarlingX and members of the technical commitee had a few productive discussions regarding the best approach to deal with a proposed new pilot project for incubation in the OSF's Edge Computing strategic focus

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Organizational diversity tag

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Mohammed Naser wrote: >> >> During the TC retrospective at the OpenStack summit last week, the >> topic of the organizational diversity tag is becoming irrelevant was >> brought up by Thierry (ttx)[1].

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] StarlingX project status update

, Mohammed Naser wrote: > Hi everyone: > > Over the past week in the summit, there was a lot of discussion > regarding StarlingX > and members of the technical commitee had a few productive discussions > regarding > the best approach to deal with a proposed new pilot pro

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] A culture change (nitpicking)

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Artom Lifshitz wrote: > I dunno, there's a fine line to be drawn between getting a finished > product that looks unprofessional (because of typos, English mistakes, > etc), and nitpicking to the point of smothering and being > counter-productive. One idea would

[openstack-dev] [nova] Adding hostId to metadata

Hi everyone: While working with the OpenStack infrastructure team, we noticed that we were having some intermittent issues where we wanted to identify a theory if all VMs with this issue were landing on the same hypervisor. However, there seems to be no way of directly accessing `hostId` from

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][stackalytics][neutron] neutron-lib not showing as TC-approved project on stackalytics

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Boden Russell wrote: > Back in 2016 we tagged neutron-lib as a "tc-approved-release" and as a > result neutron-lib commits/reviews showed up on stackalytics under > TC-approved Project Types. > > However as of recent that's seemed to have

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Now that we are all part-time, I'd like to toy with a new idea, > proposed in the past by Jesse, to rotate the duties with people who > are involved in OSA, or want to get involved more

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] How do you use the instance IP filter?

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Nova has had this long-standing known performance issue if you're > filtering a large number of instances by IP. The instance IPs are stored in > a JSON blob in the database so we don't do filtering in SQL. We pull

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] avoid rechecks

h the puppet CI? > > Cheers, > Arnaud. > > On 1 October 2017 at 17:27, Mohammed Naser <mna...@vexxhost.com> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> As the Puppet modules CI is still in the process of getting plumbed >> properly with Zuul v3, you'll notice many of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] How do you use the instance IP filter?

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2017-10-26 22:26:59 -0400 (-0400), Mohammed Naser wrote: > [...] > > The use-case for us is that it helps us easily identify or find VMs which > > we get any abuse reports for (or anything

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Ubuntu problems + Help needed

Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > _

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Jonathan Rosser as core reviewer

> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mohammed Naser — vexxhost

[openstack-dev] [election] [openstack-ansible] Candidacy for OpenStack Ansible

is extremely useful. I hope to work with the team for the upcoming cycle. Regards, Mohammed -- Mohammed Naser — vexxhost - D. 514-316-8872 D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200 E. mna...@vexxhost.com W. http://vexxhost.com

[openstack-dev] [puppet] non-candidacy for stein

Hi everyone, Unfortunately, I've gotten busy with a few other projects over time and I won't be able to run PTL for the upcoming Stein cycle. I'd like to personally thank all of the current Puppet team due to their help in on-boarding and helping me take on one of my first leadership experiences

Re: [openstack-dev] Stepping down as coordinator for the Outreachy internships

Hi Victoria, Thank you so much for all your wonderful work especially around Outreachy! :) Sincerely, Mohammed On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 7:47 PM, Victoria Martínez de la Cruz wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm reaching you out to let you know that I'll be stepping down as > coordinator for OpenStack next

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

cribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Mohammed Naser — vexxhost - D. 514-316-8872 D. 800-910-1726

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

enstack-ansible-os_tempest/ > [3] > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/kolla-ansible/tree/ansible/roles/tempest > [4] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ansible-role-tripleo-tempest > > __ > OpenStack Develop

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] K8s Conformance Testing

Hi Chris, This is an awesome effort. We can provide nested virt resources which are leveraged by Kata at the moment. Thanks! Mohammed Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 21, 2018, at 6:38 PM, Chris Hoge wrote: > > As discussed at the Vancouver SIG-K8s and Copenhagen SIG-OpenStack sessions, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] extraction (technical) update

Forgive me for barging into this, but just with my deployer and PTL of a deployment project hat on.. As part of the split, wouldn't we *not* need to make a devstack change if this is done correctly because placement will become a nova dependency, which is pulled out of Git and when using Zuul,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][kolla-ansible][DevStack][Tempest][openstack-ansible] Collaborate towards creating a unified ansible tempest role in openstack-ansible project

> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mohammed Naser — vex

[openstack-dev] [tc] Fast-track: Remove Stable branch maintenance as a project team

Hi everyone: This email is just to notify everyone on the TC and the community that the change to remove the stable branch maintenance as a project team[1] has been fast-tracked[2]. The change should be approved on 2018-07-28 however it is beneficial to remove the stable branch team (which has

[openstack-dev] [tc] Technical Committee update for week of 23 July

/#/c/583947/ - designate Mohammed Naser as vice chair https://review.openstack.org/#/c/583948/ Other approved changes: - ansible-role-tripleo-zaqar had a typo which was fixed up https://review.openstack.org/#/c/583636/ - added validation for repo names (because of the above!) https

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] extraction (technical) update

he sqlalchemy-migrate versions table). > > --Dan > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.o

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

; __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] extraction (technical) update

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:57 AM Matt Riedemann wrote: > > On 9/5/2018 8:47 AM, Mohammed Naser wrote: > > Could placement not do what happened for a while when the nova_api > > database was created? > > Can you be more specific? I'm having a brain fart here and no

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][placement][upgrade][qa] Some upgrade-specific news on extraction

come? I've dropped my -1 from this given the discussion https://review.openstack.org/#/c/600157/ > --Dan > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-r

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] no meeting this week

Hi team: We won't be conducting a meeting this week because of the PTG, however, we'll be making an effort to try and allow/bring remote access to those not at the PTG over this week. Thanks everyone. Regards, Mohammed __

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] ptg schedule

me know if you have any difficulty accessing that link. Also, it seems like a very loaded schedule however we're likely going to have extra time here and there so it's very tentative :) Thanks and look forward to seeing everyone! Regards, Mohammed -- Mohammed Naser — vexxhost

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] extraction (technical) update

the catalog can get cached in various places > such that much of nova would need a restart to notice? We already have placement in the catalog and it's behind a load balancer so changing the backends resolves things right away, so we likely won't be needing any restarts (and

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][tc] Opinion about 'PTL' tooling

I think something we should take into consideration is *what* you consider health because the way we’ve gone about it over health checks is not something that can become a toolkit because it was more of question asking, etc Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 10, 2018, at 6:29 AM, Rico Lin wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [election] [tc] thank you

Émilien: I think you’re one of the role models of our community. Your leadership has helped make it easier for me to become more involved from leading a project to joining the TC. Thank you again! Regards, Mohammed Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 4, 2018, at 10:11 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] PTL Election Season

> On Jan 22, 2018, at 6:46 PM, Jay S Bryant wrote: > > > >> On 1/22/2018 5:09 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >>> On 1/15/2018 11:04 AM, Kendall Nelson wrote: >>> Election details: https://governance.openstack.org/election/ >>> >>> Please read the stipulations and timelines

Re: [openstack-dev] Pros and Cons of face-to-face meetings

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Flint WALRUS wrote: > Pretty easy, put the PTG online with a livestream on > YouTube/Hangout/whatever platform that will then be saved and could even be > watched later on! +1 I think that we can work out a solution so that every room at

Re: [openstack-dev] Going but not gone

Major, I've only recently had the chance to work with you more recently on several projects but it's always been great to see the type of work that you do. From seeing the work that you do inside OpenStack, to your extremely informative blog and the talks you've given. You'll be greatly missed

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Add new puppet-senlin repository to Puppet OpenStack

> > I have added new puppet-senlin repository to Puppet OpenStack[1][2][3]. I'm > going to work on this module. Please review. > > [1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/559537/ > [2]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/559539/ > [3]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/559563/

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] campaign question: How can we make contributing to OpenStack easier?

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > [This is meant to be one of (I hope) several conversation-provoking > questions directed at prospective TC members to help the community > understand their positions before considering how to vote in the > ongoing

Re: [openstack-dev] [ALL][PTLs] Community Goals for Rocky: Toggle the debug option at runtime

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-03-16 21:22:51 + (+), Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > [...] >> It seems mod_wsgi doesn't want python applications catching SIGHUP, >> as Apache expects to be able to catch that. By default, it even ensures >>

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping selinux support

) With the work currently in place to let OpenStack Ansible install distro packages, we can rely on upstream `openstack-selinux` package to deliver deployments that run with SELinux on. Is there anyone opposed to removing it? If so, please let us know. :-) Thanks! Mohammed -- Mohammed Naser — vexxhost

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping selinux support

Also, this is the change that drops it, so feel free to vote with your opinion there too: https://review.openstack.org/578887 Drop SELinux support from os_swift On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Mohammed Naser wrote: > Hi everyone: > > This email is to ask if there is anyone out ther

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping selinux support

Hi Paul: On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:56:22PM -0400, Mohammed Naser wrote: >> Hi everyone: >> >> This email is to ask if there is anyone out there opposed to removing >> SELinux bits from OpenStack ansible, it's

[openstack-dev] [tc][all] Discussing goals (upgrades) with community @ office hours

Hi everyone! It looks like we're not going to be able to have a TC meeting every 2 weeks as I had hoped for, the majority of the TC seems to want to meet once every month. However, I wanted to ask if the community would be interested in taking one of the upcoming office hours to discuss the

Re: [openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg][sdk][osc][tc] Extracting vendor profiles from openstacksdk

ge questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mohammed Naser — vexxhost - D. 514-316-8872 D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200 E. mna...@

[openstack-dev] [tc][all] meetings outside IRC

Hi everyone: I was going over our governance documents, more specifically this section: "All project meetings are held in public IRC channels and recorded." Does this mean that all official projects are *required* to hold their project meetings over IRC? Is this a hard requirement or is this

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping xenial jobs

FYI: Thanks to Jesse, he has picked up this work and it's up here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/609329/6 On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 9:56 AM Jesse Pretorius wrote: > > On 10/10/18, 5:54 AM, "Mohammed Naser" wrote: > > >So I’ve been thinking of dropping the Xenial j

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] No complains about rabbitmq SSL problems: could we have this in the logs?

For what it’s worth: I ran into the same issue. I think the problem lies a bit deeper because it’s a problem with kombu as when debugging I saw that Oslo messaging tried to connect and hung after. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 31, 2018, at 2:29 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Hi, > > It took

Re: [openstack-dev] Storyboard python script

I believe this project is a client for Storyboard, an OpenStack project and not the commercial product you’re mentioning Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 31, 2018, at 11:39 PM, Krishna Jain wrote: > > Hi, > I’m an animator with some coding experience picking up Python. I came across > your

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][openstack-ansible][nova][placement] Owners needed for placement extraction upgrade deployment tooling

c/604454/ > [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/600162/ > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Searchlight][release] Searchlight will release Stein-1

__ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mohammed Naser — vexxhost --

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-community] Sharing upstream contribution mentoring result with Korea user group

In echoing the words of everyone, it takes a tremendous amount of effort and patience to lead this effort. THANK YOU! Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 30, 2018, at 6:14 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > "Ian Y. Choi" writes: > >> Hello, >> >> I got involved organizing & mentoring Korean people

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][placement] Placement requests and caching in the resource tracker

on. > > * Regardless of what we do, I think we should probably *at least* make > that refresh associations config allow 0 to disable it so CERN (and > others) can avoid the need to continually forward-porting code to > disable it. > > [1] > https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-s

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][placement] Placement requests and caching in the resource tracker

ions config allow 0 to disable it so CERN (and > others) can avoid the need to continually forward-porting code to > disable it. +1 > [1] > https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/rocky/implemented/placement-mirror-host-aggregates.html > [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Using externally stored keys for encryption

ing that's possible at the moment or if we perhaps need to look into it. Thanks, Mohammed -- Mohammed Naser — vexxhost - D. 514-316-8872 D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200 E. mna...@vexxhost.com W. http://ve

Re: [openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg] Serving vendor json from RFC 5785 well-known dir

Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 5, 2018, at 10:19 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Monty Taylor wrote: >> [...] >> What if we added support for serving vendor data files from the root of a >> primary URL as-per RFC 5785. Specifically, support deployers adding a json >> file to

Re: [openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg] Serving vendor json from RFC 5785 well-known dir

e provider rather than maintainers of this project is a much cleaner alternative, IMHO. > Monty > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.ope

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][placement] Placement requests and caching in the resource tracker

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 4:17 PM Matt Riedemann wrote: > > On 11/4/2018 4:22 AM, Mohammed Naser wrote: > > Just for information sake, a clean state cloud which had no reported issues > > over maybe a period of 2-3 months already has 4 allocations which are > > incorrect and

  1   2   >