Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Rotating the weekly Neutron meeting

+1, thanks! On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: Per this week's Neutron meeting [1], it was decided that offering a rotating meeting slot for the weekly Neutron meeting would be a good thing. This will allow for a much easier time for people in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] Migration from nova-network to Neutron for large production clouds

Hi, I'd like to encourage everybody interested to take a look and leave comments on the Neutron migration spec here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101921 The design currently includes both cold and live approaches, supports host-by-host migration (as opposite to big bang) and doesn't require

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Juno-3 BP meeting

Works for me. On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote: Good for me. - Original Message - Works perfect for me. I will join. Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown ( www.nitrodesk.com ) -Original Message- From: Carl Baldwin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron py27 test 'FAIL: process-returncode'

Hi Gary, please see my comments on the review. Thanks, Oleg On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Gary Duan garyd...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The patch I submitted for L3 service framework integration fails on jenkins test, py26 and py27. The console only gives following error message,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

Hi, I would add another candidate for being a closed set: L7VipPolicyAssociation.action (use_backend, block, etc.) Thanks, Oleg On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Avishay Balderman avish...@radware.comwrote: (removing extra space from the subject - let email clients apply their filters)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7Policy deletion

Hi Avishay, I agree that we can do that as you proposed. However I'd like to remind that for health monitors we decided to prohibit deletion if there are any associations (https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1243129). So I'd like l7 policy deletion to be consistent with health monitor

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

Hi, On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.comwrote: Hi Avishay, 1) I think name might be useful. Consider user forms a list of rules which route requests to a pool with static images or static pages, it may make sense to give those policy a name

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

· Entity:L7VipPolicyAssociation o Attribute:action § Possible values: · POOL (must have pool id) · REDIRECT(must have a url to be used as redirect destination) · REJECT *From:* Oleg Bondarev [mailto:obonda...@mirantis.com] *Sent:* Monday

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Nominate Oleg Bondarev for Core

and no negative votes from the other cores. mark On Feb 10, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Mark McClain mmccl...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: All- I'd like to nominate Oleg Bondarev to become a Neutron core reviewer. Oleg has been valuable contributor to Neutron by actively reviewing, working on bugs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] DOWN and INACTIVE status in FWaaS and LBaaS

Hi, For LBaaS the background is simple: it uses statuses from neutron/plugins/common/constants.py and INACTIVE was there initially while DOWN appeared later (with VPNaaS first commit). So LBaaS doesn't use DOWN at all. As for INACTIVE, it is currently used only for members that stop responding to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

Hi Jorge, Thanks for taking care of this and bringing it all together! This will be really useful for LBaaS discussions. I updated the wiki to include L7 rules support and also marking already implemented requirements. Thanks, Oleg On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Jorge Miramontes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]

Hi Vijay, Currently Neutron LBaaS supports only namespace based implementation for HAProxy. You can however run LBaaS agent on the host other than network controller node - in that case HAProxy processes will be running on that host but still in namespaces. Also there is an effort in Neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron LBaaS] Need help with LBaaS drivers

Hi Vijay, Currently you may follow two ways in writing an LBaaS driver: 1) write it from scratch (like Radware, Netscaler, Embrane drivers) - in this case your driver should inherit abstract_driver.LoadBalancerAbstractDriver and will be running on Neutron service process, LBaaS agent

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Tenant's info from plugin/services

Hi Ivar, Please take a look at this review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52128/ Here Akihiro adds tenant and user names to the Neutron context. Thanks, Oleg On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Ivar Lazzaro i...@embrane.com wrote: Hello Everyone, ** ** I was wondering if there’s a

[openstack-dev] LBaaS: should we check for associations when deleting health monitor?

Hi, Currently in LBaaS when health monitor object is deleted all associations with pools are deleted automatically. A bug was reported recently in Neutron where the reporter considers this behavior as wrong: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1243129 I have no strong opinion so I'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nova] Weekly nova-network / neutron parity meeting

Thanks for setting this up Kyle, Wednesday 1500 UTC works for me. Thanks, Oleg On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: That time is around 1am for me. I'm ok with that as long as someone

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Nova-network to Neutron migration: issues with libvirt

Hi all, While investigating possible options for Nova-network to Neutron migration I faced a couple of issues with libvirt. One of the key requirements for the migration is that instances should stay running and don't need restarting. In order to meet this requirement we need to either attach new

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Nova-network to Neutron migration: issues with libvirt

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.comwrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi all, While investigating possible options for Nova-network to Neutron migration I faced a couple of issues with libvirt. One

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Nova-network to Neutron migration: issues with libvirt

So here is the etherpad for the migration discussion: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/novanet-neutron-migration I've also filed a design session on this: http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/374 Currently I'm still struggling with instance vNic update, trying to move it from one bridge to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Nova-network to Neutron migration: issues with libvirt

://libvirt.org/sources/virshcmdref/html-single/#sect-update-device On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.com wrote: So here is the etherpad for the migration discussion: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/novanet-neutron-migration I've also filed a design session

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Nova-network to Neutron migration: issues with libvirt

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.comwrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.com wrote: Yeah, I also saw in docs that update-device is supported since 0.8.0 version, not sure why it didn't work in my setup. I installed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Nova-network to Neutron migration: issues with libvirt

, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.comwrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Oleg Bondarev obonda

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Nova-network to Neutron migration: issues with libvirt

PM, Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.com wrote: So by running ping while instance interface update we can see ~10-20 sec of connectivity downtime. Here is a tcp capture during update (pinging ext net gateway): 05:58:41.020791 IP 10.0.0.4 172.24.4.1: ICMP echo request, id 29954, seq

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Nova-network to Neutron migration: issues with libvirt

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.comwrote: On 30 April 2014 17:28, Jesse Pretorius jesse.pretor...@gmail.com wrote: On 30 April 2014 16:30, Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.com wrote: I've tried updating interface while running ssh session from guest

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]what's diffrent between the type 'PING' and ‘TCP’ in health_monitor

Hi, LBaaS haproxy driver doesn't support PING health monitors and doesn't distinguish PING and TCP. We need to fix it to fail when applying PING health monitor to a haproxy loadbalancer. Thanks for reporting! Oleg On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:58 AM, shihanzhang ayshihanzh...@126.com wrote: Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposed changes to core team

+1! Congratulations Carl! Thanks, Oleg On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: +1 On 5/26/14 1:35 PM, Akihiro Motoki amot...@gmail.com wrote: +1 from me too. Akihiro On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote: I

Re: [openstack-dev] [NOVA] security group fails to attach to an instance if port-id is specified during boot.

Hi Parikshit, Looks like a bug. Currently if port is specified its security groups are not updated, it shpould be fixed. I've reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1373774 to track this. Thanks for reporting! Thanks, Oleg On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Parikshit Manur

Re: [openstack-dev] [NOVA] security group fails to attach to an instance if port-id is specified during boot.

is created and second when the instance is spawned. Thoughts? *From:* Oleg Bondarev [mailto:obonda...@mirantis.com] *Sent:* 25 September 2014 08:19 *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [NOVA] security group fails to attach

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Launching multiple VMs in Nova

Hi, It turns out that there is a 1:1 relationship between rpc_thread_pool_size messaging config [1] and the number of instances that can be spawned simultaneously. Please see bug [2] for more details. I think this should be at least documented. Thoughts? Thanks, Oleg [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] social event

Please count me in. Thanks, Oleg ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] Migration from Nova-net to Neutron

Hi, please see answers inline. On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Hassaan Pasha pasha.hass...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, I have some questions related to the migration of instances from nova-net to neutron. Assuming we have deployed Openstack with neutron disabled and we are running some

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Common agent based driver for LBaaS

Hi folks, While working on agent scheduling for LBaaS reference implementation ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32137/) I thought that it would be useful to unify existing agent to make it suite any vendor who wants to use async mechanism and agent scheduling. I filed a blueprint on this -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Common agent based driver for LBaaS

be corresponding RPC API which then is shared between services. That needs to be thought out and discussed. Thanks, Eugene. On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.comwrote: Hi folks, While working on agent scheduling for LBaaS reference implementation ( https

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Common agent based driver for LBaaS

be designed in such way that allows sending messages to proper device driver. Thanks, Eugene. On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.comwrote: Hi Eugene, ...RPC API which then is shared between services. Did you mean device drivers rather than services? Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Quantum][LBaaS] Feedback needed: Healthmonitor workflow.

Hi, First want to mention that currently health monitor is not a pure DB object: upon creation the request is also send to device/driver. Another thing is that there is no delete_health_monitor in driver API (delete_pool_health_monitor only deletes the association) which is weird because

Re: [openstack-dev] Topic: Reschedule Router to a different agent with multiple external networks.

Hi Swaminathan Vasudevan, please check the following docstring of L3_NAT_dbonly_mixin._check_router_needs_rescheduling: *def _check_router_needs_rescheduling(self, context, router_id, gw_info):* *Checks whether router's l3 agent can handle the given network* *When

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] The state of nova-network to neutron migration

in addition to Oleg Bondarev to be available to help come up with ideas and words to describe them to create the specs in a very short amount of time (Oleg is doing great work and is a fabulous person, yay Oleg, he just can't do this alone) * specifically I need a contact on the nova side

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] The state of nova-network to neutron migration

On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 12/24/2014 04:07 AM, Oleg Bondarev wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 12/22/2014 01:32 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Kyle Mestery mest

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Changes to the core team

+1 for Doug, he does a great job! Thanks, Oleg On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: I agree with the proposed changes. I would also like to take a chance to thank Sumit for the effort he has put in this project over several years - he has been in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [NOVA] security group fails to attach to an instance if port-id is specified during boot.

Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 9/26/2014 3:19 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:25:49 +0400 Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:30 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote: I think the expectation is that if a user

Re: [openstack-dev] [NOVA] security group fails to attach to an instance if port-id is specified during boot.

is provided on boot - but this still leaves a chance of broken user expectations. On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Feodor Tersin fter...@cloudscaling.com wrote: nova boot ... --nic port-id=xxx --nic net-id=yyy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Better-quotas blueprint

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: I was hoping to push code today for [1], but unfortunately I got caught by something else during this week and I'll miss the code proposal

Re: [openstack-dev] DVR and l2 population

Hi, with https://review.openstack.org/166707/ l2_population is only checked when tunneling is enabled. Thanks, Oleg On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Itzik Brown itz...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, As I understand it l2 population is not a requirement but it's strongly recommended.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing YAMAMOTO Takashi for the Control Plane core team

+1 On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Not on the list either, but I want to +1 what Henry said. Yamamoto's reviews expand to the whole code base and are pretty always *very* usefu l. On 06/12/2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Rossella Sblendido for the Control Plane core team

+1 On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 No doubt +1. On 06/12/2015 09:44 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: Hello! As the Lieutenant of the built-in control plane[1], I would like Rossella Sblendido to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposing Assaf Muller for the Neutron Core Reviewer Team

+1 On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Henry Gessau ges...@cisco.com wrote: +1 On Thu, May 28, 2015, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: Folks, I'd like to propose Assaf Muller to be a member of the Neutron core reviewer team. Assaf has been a long time contributor in Neutron, and he's

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]Subnet's dns nameserver doesn't order by input

Hi, Currently there is no dns servers prioritization for subnets in Neutron. There is an opened bug for this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1218629 Thanks, Oleg On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Zhi Chang chang...@unitedstack.com wrote: Hi, all Subnet's nameserver is out of

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Proposing Miguel Angel Ajo for the Control Plane core team

Big +1 On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote: +1! - Original Message - A huge +1 From: Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Monday, July 6, 2015 at 1:02 PM To: OpenStack List

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dvr] Removing fip namespace when restarting L3 agent.

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Korzeniewski, Artur artur.korzeniew...@intel.com wrote: Bug submitted: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1482521 Ok, here is the fix: https://review.openstack.org/210539 Thanks! Oleg Thanks, Artur *From:* Oleg Bondarev [mailto:obonda

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!

+1 On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Henry Gessau ges...@cisco.com wrote: +1 to both! On Wed, Aug 12, 2015, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: It gives me great pleasure to propose Russell Bryant and Brandon Logan as core reviewers in the API/DB/RPC area of Neutron. Russell and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dvr] Removing fip namespace when restarting L3 agent.

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Korzeniewski, Artur artur.korzeniew...@intel.com wrote: Thanks Kevin for that hint. But it does not resolve the connectivity problem, it is just not removing the namespace when it is asked to. The real question is, why do we invoke the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Cedric Brandily to Neutron Core Reviewer Team

+1 On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Brian Haley brian.ha...@hp.com wrote: +1 On 07/15/2015 02:47 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote: As the Neutron L3 Lieutenant along with Kevin Benton for control plane, and Assaf Muller for testing, I would like to propose Cedric Brandily as a member of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Weekly DVR Meeting starting next week

Just realized that tomorrow is a non-working day in Russia due to Unity Day. Still will try to attend the first meeting. Thanks, Oleg On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Ryan Moats wrote: > Ditto Ryan (regXboi) Moats > > Carl Baldwin wrote on 11/02/2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][DVR]

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville) < swaminathan.vasude...@hpe.com> wrote: > Hi Carl, > Sounds reasonable suggestion. > Thanks > Swami > > -Original Message- > From: Carl Baldwin [mailto:c...@ecbaldwin.net] > Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 10:47 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Live Migration Issues with L3/L2

I think it might be a bit early to start a cross-project discussion on this. I'd suggest to first figure out what questions do we have, what would we like to get from nova. So I think it'd be more constructive if we first think on it within neutron team. I left some questions on the bug [1],

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Getting project version from API

Hi, There are cases where it would be useful to know the version of Neutron (or any other project) from API, like during upgrades or in cross-project communication cases. For example in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/246910/ Nova needs to know if Neutron sends vif-plugged event during live

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Getting project version from API

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > > On 06 Jun 2016, at 16:44, Sean M. Collins wrote: > > > > I agree, it would be convenient to have something similar to what Nova > > has: > > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Getting project version from API

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 6 June 2016 at 10:06, Oleg Bondarev <obonda...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> There are cases where it would be useful to know the version of Neutron >> (or a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-ovn] OVN vs. OpenDayLight

Hi, [1] is a doc comparing OVN and ODL for Neutron. I wrote it in March so some info might be stale. Hope this can be useful, comments are welcome! [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/13K4Xpdu1IbRJDj5JTepDI4nwUkCDCu7IOnYwHkZtcMA/edit?usp=sharing Thanks, Oleg On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:28

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Hirofumi Ichihara to Neutron Core Reviewer Team

+1, thanks Hirofumi! On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > Hi Neutrinos, > > As the API Lieutenant of Neutron team, > I would like to propose Hirofumi Ichihara (irc: hichihara) as a member of > Neutron core reviewer team mainly focuing on the API/DB area. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

Count me in! On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > WAT??? > > It was never supposed to be core only. Everyone is welcome! > ++ > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 25 Apr 2016, at 11:56, Edgar Magana wrote: > > > > Would you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Jakub Libosvar for testing core

+1 On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:36 AM, Doug Wiegley wrote: > +1 > > On Jul 21, 2016, at 5:13 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote: > >> +1 from me >> >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Ocata End user and operator feedback recap

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Carl Baldwin wrote: > Ocata End user and operator feedback recap > > > The purpose of this session was to gather feedback from end users and > operators to help direct the efforts of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron team social event in Barcelona

+1 On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Jakub Libosvar wrote: > +1 > > > On 14/10/2016 20:30, Miguel Lavalle wrote: > >> Dear Neutrinos, >> >> I am organizing a social event for the team on Thursday 27th at 19:30. >> After doing some Google research, I am proposing Raco de la

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposing Abhishek Raut as neutronclient core

+1 On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Brandon Logan wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 02:22 +0100, Armando M. wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Abhishek Raut's recent involvement in OSC and python-neutronclient has > helped moving a few efforts along in the right

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Miguel Lavalle as neutron core and Brian Haley as L3 Lt

+1! On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Andreas Scheuring < scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > +1 > -- > - > Andreas > IRC: andreas_s > > > > On Fr, 2016-12-16 at 00:14 +0100, Armando M. wrote: > > Hi neutrinos, > > > > > > Miguel Lavalle has been driving the project forward consistently

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

+1 On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:04 AM, reedip banerjee wrote: > +1 for both Ryan and Nate :) > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Vikram Choudhary > wrote: > >> +1 for Ryan! >> >> On Dec 16, 2016 7:23 AM, "Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw)" < >>