Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][DOUBT]Please clarify
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Sharath V vsharat...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Friends, Have an doubt, please clarify me .!! When i start understanding openstack , There are three nodes a) controller node b)Compute node c) Network node i) as my understanding controller node contains all the components like nova,neutron cinder,glance,swift,Horizon etc ii) Compute node is nova and neutron but not all components. iii) Network node is nova and neutron. when i reading doc , they said like openstack compute (Controller Services) , openstack network services (Cloud controller) , can you please clarify is each and every component of openstack has controller and client? [like Nova Service(Controller) - Nova Client, Neutron Service (Controller) - neutron client, cinder controller - cinder client ] or (nova controller for compute , nova-network for cloud controller), Is Nova only controller , if nova is only a controller it must be act as orchestration right? if yes then why we have to use heat for orchestration ? If any thing wrong , please clarify me, if you have any document or guide please route to me. http://docs.openstack.org/ Regards, Noorul ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Proposed Core Reviewer Changes
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Solum Cores, I propose the following changes to the Solum core reviewer team: +gokrokve +julienvey +devdatta-kulkarni -kgriffs (inactivity) -russelb (inactivity) +1 :) Regards, Noorul ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [requirements] python-solumclient
Hello all, In solum we are using python-solumclient to communicate with our builder-api [1] . For that we need python-solumclient to be included as a dependency in requirements.txt. But requirement check gate is failing since python-solumclient is not part of global-requirements. Submitted a patch [2] for adding the same. But it got a -2, since solum is not an OpenStack project. But I see that solum and python-solumclient in requirements/projects.txt. All I can think of is to remove requirements gating for solum. I would like to know if someone has other better solution for this problem. Regards, Noorul [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80459 [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80756/ ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum][Oslo] Next Release of oslo.messaging?
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Doug Hellmann and Victror Stinner (+ oslo cores), Solum currently depends on a py33 gate. We want to use oslo.messaging, but are worried that in the current state, we will be stuck without py33 support. We hope that by adding the Trollius code[1], and getting a new release number, that we can add the oslo.messaging library to our requirements and proceed with our async messaging plan. I am seeking guidance from you on when the above might happen. If it's a short time, we may just wait for it. If it's a long time, we may need to relax our py33 gate to non-voting in order to prevent breakage of our Stackforge CI while we work with the oslo.messaging code. We are also considering doing an ugly workaround of creating a bunch of worker processes on the same messaging topic until we can clear this concern. Thoughts? I think we should not make python33 gate non-voting as we will miss out issues related others. We can toggle the oslo.messaging related tests to not run in python33. Regards, Noorul ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [keystone] Integrating with 3rd party DB
Hello stackers, We have a database with tables users, projects, roles, etc. Is there any reference implementation or best practices to make keystone use this DB instead of its own? I have been reading https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Keystone/Federation/Blueprint but I could not find a open reference implementation for the same. Regards, Noorul ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Devstack gate is failing
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda noo...@noorul.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/08/2014 11:40 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote: On Jan 8, 2014 9:58 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com mailto:gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, I do understand why there is a push back for this patch. This patch is for infrastructure project which works for multiple projects. Infra maintainers should not know specifics of each project in details. If this patch is a temporary solution then who will be responsible to remove it? I am not sure who is responsible for solum related configurations in infra project. I see that almost all the infra config for solum project is done by solum members. So I think any solum member can submit a patch to revert this once we have a permanent solution. If we need start this gate I propose to revert all patches which led to this inconsistent state and apply workaround in Solum repository which is under Solum team full control and review. We need to open a bug in Solum project to track this. The problematic patch [1] solves a specific problem. Do we have other ways to solve it? Regards, Noorul [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64226 Why is test-requirements.txt getting installed in pre_test instead of post_test? Installing test-requirements prior to installing devstack itself in no way surprises me that it causes issues. You can see that command is litterally the first thing in the console - http://logs.openstack.org/66/62466/7/gate/gate-solum-devstack-dsvm/49bac35/console.html#_2014-01-08_13_46_15_161 It should be installed right before tests get run, which I assume is L34 of this file - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64226/3/modules/openstack_project/files/jenkins_job_builder/config/solum.yaml Given that is where ./run_tests.sh is run. This might help, but run_tests.sh anyhow will import oslo.config. I need to test this and see. Tested and this is working. Thank you Sean. Regards, Noorul ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Devstack gate is failing
On Jan 8, 2014 6:11 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/07/2014 11:27 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote: On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: Should we rather revert patch to make gate working? I think it is always good to have test packages reside in test-requirements.txt. So -1 on reverting that patch. Here [1] is a temporary solution. Regards, Noorul [1] https://review.openstack.org/65414 If Solum is trying to be on the road to being an OpenStack project, why would it go out of it's way to introduce an incompatibility in the way all the actual OpenStack packages work in the gate? Seems very silly to me, because you'll have to add oslo.sphinx back into test-requirements.txt the second you want to be considered for incubation. I am not sure why it seems silly to you. We are not anyhow removing oslo.sphinx from the repository. We are just removing it before installing the packages from test-requirements.txt in the devstack gate. How does that affects incubation? Am I missing something? Regards, Noorul -Sean -- Sean Dague Samsung Research America s...@dague.net / sean.da...@samsung.com http://dague.net ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Devstack gate is failing
On Jan 8, 2014 9:58 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, I do understand why there is a push back for this patch. This patch is for infrastructure project which works for multiple projects. Infra maintainers should not know specifics of each project in details. If this patch is a temporary solution then who will be responsible to remove it? I am not sure who is responsible for solum related configurations in infra project. I see that almost all the infra config for solum project is done by solum members. So I think any solum member can submit a patch to revert this once we have a permanent solution. If we need start this gate I propose to revert all patches which led to this inconsistent state and apply workaround in Solum repository which is under Solum team full control and review. We need to open a bug in Solum project to track this. The problematic patch [1] solves a specific problem. Do we have other ways to solve it? Regards, Noorul [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64226 Thanks Georgy On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com wrote: Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org writes: On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda noo...@noorul.com wrote: On Jan 8, 2014 6:11 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/07/2014 11:27 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote: On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: Should we rather revert patch to make gate working? I think it is always good to have test packages reside in test-requirements.txt. So -1 on reverting that patch. Here [1] is a temporary solution. Regards, Noorul [1] https://review.openstack.org/65414 If Solum is trying to be on the road to being an OpenStack project, why would it go out of it's way to introduce an incompatibility in the way all the actual OpenStack packages work in the gate? Seems very silly to me, because you'll have to add oslo.sphinx back into test-requirements.txt the second you want to be considered for incubation. I am not sure why it seems silly to you. We are not anyhow removing oslo.sphinx from the repository. We are just removing it before installing the packages from test-requirements.txt in the devstack gate. How does that affects incubation? Am I missing something? Docs are a requirement, and contributor docs are required for applying for incubation. [1] Typically these are built through Sphinx and consistency is gained through oslo.sphinx, also eventually we can offer consistent extensions. So a perception that you're skipping docs would be a poor reflection on your incubation application. I don't think that's what's happening here, but I want to be sure you understand the consistency and doc needs. See also http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-January/023582.htmlfor similar issues, we're trying to figure out the best solution. Stay tuned. I have seen that, also posted solum issue [1] there yesterday. I started this thread to have consensus on making solum devstack gate non-voting until the issue gets fixed. Also proposed a temporary solution with which we can solve the issue for the time being. Since the gate is failing for all the patches, it is affecting every patch. Regards, Noorul [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-January/023618.html [2] https://review.openstack.org/65414 1. https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/reference/incubation-integration-requirements Regards, Noorul -Sean -- Sean Dague Samsung Research America s...@dague.net / sean.da...@samsung.com http://dague.net ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Georgy Okrokvertskhov Technical Program Manager, Cloud and Infrastructure Services, Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com Tel. +1 650 963 9828 Mob. +1 650 996 3284 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing
Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Devstack gate is failing
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/08/2014 11:40 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote: On Jan 8, 2014 9:58 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com mailto:gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, I do understand why there is a push back for this patch. This patch is for infrastructure project which works for multiple projects. Infra maintainers should not know specifics of each project in details. If this patch is a temporary solution then who will be responsible to remove it? I am not sure who is responsible for solum related configurations in infra project. I see that almost all the infra config for solum project is done by solum members. So I think any solum member can submit a patch to revert this once we have a permanent solution. If we need start this gate I propose to revert all patches which led to this inconsistent state and apply workaround in Solum repository which is under Solum team full control and review. We need to open a bug in Solum project to track this. The problematic patch [1] solves a specific problem. Do we have other ways to solve it? Regards, Noorul [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64226 Why is test-requirements.txt getting installed in pre_test instead of post_test? Installing test-requirements prior to installing devstack itself in no way surprises me that it causes issues. You can see that command is litterally the first thing in the console - http://logs.openstack.org/66/62466/7/gate/gate-solum-devstack-dsvm/49bac35/console.html#_2014-01-08_13_46_15_161 It should be installed right before tests get run, which I assume is L34 of this file - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64226/3/modules/openstack_project/files/jenkins_job_builder/config/solum.yaml Given that is where ./run_tests.sh is run. This might help, but run_tests.sh anyhow will import oslo.config. I need to test this and see. Regards, Noorul ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] olso.config error on running Devstack
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Michael Kerrin michael.ker...@hp.com wrote: I have been seeing this problem also. My problem is actually with oslo.sphinx. I ran sudo pip install -r test-requirements.txt in cinder so that I could run the tests there, which installed oslo.sphinx. Strange thing is that the oslo.sphinx installed a directory called oslo in /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages with no __init__.py file. With this package installed like so I get the same error you get with oslo.config. I don't need oslo.sphinx so I just went and manually deleted the oslo directory and the oslo.sphinx* files in /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages. Everything worked fine after that. Not sure what to do about this, but that is my story In solum, we are trying to use devstack job for functional testing. We are installing test packages [1] from test-requirements.txt, hence we are also facing similar issue. See [2] and [3] Regards, Noorul [1] http://logs.openstack.org/59/64059/8/check/gate-solum-devstack-dsvm/a7522b8/console.html#_2014-01-07_05_20_26_838 [2] http://logs.openstack.org/59/64059/8/check/gate-solum-devstack-dsvm/a7522b8/console.html#_2014-01-07_05_26_11_500 [3] http://logs.openstack.org/59/64059/8/check/gate-solum-devstack-dsvm/a7522b8/console.html#_2014-01-07_05_26_15_996 Michael On Mon 23 Dec 2013 14:18:11 Sean Dague wrote: On 12/23/2013 11:52 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-18 09:26, Sayali Lunkad wrote: Hello, I get the following error when I run stack.sh on Devstack Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/bin/ceilometer-dbsync, line 6, in module from ceilometer.storage import dbsync File /opt/stack/ceilometer/ceilometer/storage/__init__.py, line 23, in module from oslo.config import cfg ImportError: No module named config ++ failed ++ local r=1 +++ jobs -p ++ kill ++ set +o xtrace Search gives me olso.config is installed. Please let me know of any solution. Devstack pulls oslo.config from git, so if you have it installed on the system through pip or something it could cause problems. If you can verify that it's only in /opt/stack/oslo.config, you might try deleting that directory and rerunning devstack to pull down a fresh copy. I don't know for sure what the problem is, but those are a couple of things to try. We actually try to resolve that here: https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/master/lib/oslo#L43 However, have I said how terrible python packaging is recently? Basically you can very easily get yourself in a situation where *just enough* of the distro package is left behind that pip thinks its there, so won't install it, but the python loader doesn't, so won't work. Then much sadness. If anyone has a more fool proof way to fix this, suggestions appreciated. -Sean ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Solum] Devstack gate is failing
Hi team, After merging [1] devstack gate started failing. There is already a thread [2] related to this in mailing list. Until this gets fixed shall we make this job non-voting? Regards, Noorul [1] https://review.openstack.org/64226 [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg12440.html ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Devstack gate is failing
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: Should we rather revert patch to make gate working? I think it is always good to have test packages reside in test-requirements.txt. So -1 on reverting that patch. Here [1] is a temporary solution. Regards, Noorul [1] https://review.openstack.org/65414 On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Murali Allada murali.all...@rackspace.com wrote: I'm ok with making this non-voting for Solum until this gets fixed. -Murali On Jan 7, 2014, at 8:53 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda noo...@noorul.com wrote: Hi team, After merging [1] devstack gate started failing. There is already a thread [2] related to this in mailing list. Until this gets fixed shall we make this job non-voting? Regards, Noorul [1] https://review.openstack.org/64226 [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg12440.html ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Georgy Okrokvertskhov Technical Program Manager, Cloud and Infrastructure Services, Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com Tel. +1 650 963 9828 Mob. +1 650 996 3284 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Devstack] Why aren't test-requirements.txt installed during test runs?
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/26/2013 07:06 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, When looking at a Solum patch in review [1], I wondered why Georgy needed to move fixtures, testresources, and httplib2 into requirements.txt [2] instead of test-requirements.txt, when those aforementioned dependencies are not for Solum itself, but rather the newly-introduced functional tests. When I asked Georgy on IRC, he mentioned that the gate doesn't install the dependencies in test-requirements.txt. I'm wondering why that is the case? Why bother having a test-requirements.txt at all, if we need to list test-specific dependencies in requirements.txt? Thanks in advance for answers! Best, -jay [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64165 [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64165/9/requirements.txt ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev The gate is made up of two major types of tests. The first are self contained unittest like tests that rely on tox for their invocation and the second are the devstack-gate tests that use the devstack-gate project to configure and run tests. In both cases projects are installed from source (with pip install $PATH_TO_PROJECT iirc) which installs only the requirements.txt. These are the requirements needed to run the project but not to test it. In the tox run tests you will typically add the test-requirements.txt file to the testenv's dep list in order to get those dependencies installed for testing. In devstack-gate land no test-requirements are installed as these are functional/integration tests and should be tested as normally installed. OK, understood, thx for the detailed explanation. So it depends on which test was having trouble. If it was something run by tox then tox.ini probably needs an update. This sounds like a problem with the devstack-gate tests which are trickier because it just does normal installs of projects before testing them and the test framework is expected to pull in the test dependencies as its normal dependencies. In this case I would probably update the job in question to install the test-requirements as part of the pre_test_hook in devstack-gate. Ah, good thinking. That's indeed a good solution. Thank you, Clark! https://review.openstack.org/64226 Regards, Noorul ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Command Line Interface for Solum
On Nov 14, 2013 1:10 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Noorul, On Nov 13, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com wrote: Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com writes: On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com wrote: Hello all, I registered a new blueprint [1] for command line client interface for Solum. We need to decide whether we should have a separate repository for this or go with new unified CLI framework [2]. Since Solum is not part of OpenStack I think it is not the right time to go with the unified CLI. One of the key features of the cliff framework used for the unified command line app is that the subcommands can be installed independently of the main program. So you can write plugins that work with the openstack client, but put them in the solum client library package (and source repository). That would let you, for example: $ pip install python-solumclient $ pip install python-openstackclient $ openstack solum make me a paas Dean has done a lot of work to design a consistent noun-followed-by-verb command structure, so please look at that work when picking subcommand names (for example, you shouldn't use solum as a prefix as I did in my example above, since we are removing the project names from the commands). I think we should follow this. If others have no objection, I will submit a review to openstack-infra/config to create a new repository named python-solumclient with intial code from cookiecutter template. Adrian, Does this blue-print require to be in Approved state to perform above task? Thanks for the enthusiasm! I'd like further input from additional team members before advancing on this. I think whichever path we take a separate repository is required. Regards, Noorul ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Dev help....
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Craig Vyvial cp16...@gmail.com wrote: Krishanu, I think you might need to choose a different nickname for irc. Looks like krish could be already taken. I think it should try with different nick automatically. It could be something else. Regards, Noorul On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Krishanu Dhar rony.k...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks. I tried hooking onto the IRC but it just doesn't seem to connect. Below is the error I got. [11:59] -herbert.freenode.net- *** Looking up your hostname... [11:59] -herbert.freenode.net- *** Checking Ident [11:59] -herbert.freenode.net- *** No Ident response [11:59] -herbert.freenode.net- *** Couldn't look up your hostname [11:59] == CGI:IRC host/IP set to gateway/web/freenode/session 202.3.120.4 [11:59] == krish Nick/channel is temporarily unavailable On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com wrote: Krishanu Dhar rony.k...@gmail.com writes: Hi, I have few very basic questions. It would be really nice if someone can assist. 1. I have a program that gathers details from a db in a server and is meant to update the backend db (by backend db, I mean trove). Whats the easiest way to do this? 2. How to host a webserver on openstack? 3. How do I run code from the webserver? Are you looking for https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat Regards, Noorul -- Krishanu ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Stackforge Repo Ready
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com wrote: Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com writes: Team, Our StackForge code repo is open, so you may begin submitting code for review. For those new to the process, I made a will page with links to the repo and information about how to contribute: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/Contributing 1. .gitreview file is missing, so I submitted a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54877 This patch also contains update to README to include relevant project information. 2. My review request got rejected by Jenkins. A re-base against [1] is not helping. Clark Boylan (clarkb) from infra fixed this manually. Thank you! - Noorul ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Newbie python novaclient question
On Oct 11, 2013 6:04 PM, Alex la6...@gmail.com wrote: Is that actually doing something or parsing the sub commands? I think after args is initialized it is probably the args.func calls that actually does something. For example the following line in the main: args.func(self.cs, args) What do you think is the .func method? https://github.com/openstack/python-novaclient/blob/master/novaclient/shell.py#L473 - Noorul On Oct 11, 2013, at 3:07 AM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com wrote: Alex la6...@gmail.com writes: Yes , this method seems to look for the corresponding action but still doesn't seem to be the one actually calling them. Are you looking for this which is inside **main** method? args = subcommand_parser.parse_args(argv) Thanks and Regards Noorul Regards Al On Oct 10, 2013, at 11:07 PM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com wrote: Alex la6...@gmail.com writes: Thank you Noorul. I looked at the review. My question is that in openstackcomputeshell.main which line call the v1_1/ shell.py.function? I would look at get_subcommand_parser() method. Thanks and Regards Noorul On Oct 10, 2013, at 9:03 PM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com wrote: A L la6...@gmail.com writes: Dear Openstack Dev Gurus, I am trying to understand the python novaclient code. Can someone please point me to where in openstackcomputeshell class in shell.py does the actual function or class related to an argument gets called? This review [1] is something I submitted and it adds a sub command. May be this will give you some clue. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40181/ Thanks and Regards Noorul ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for Nova native image building
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Ian Mcleod imcl...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, A blueprint has been registered regarding API additions to Nova to enable the creation of base images from external OS install sources. This provides a way to build images from scratch via native OS installer tools using only the resources provided through Nova. These images can then be further customized by other tools that expect an existing image as an input, such as disk image builder. Blueprint - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/base-image-creation Specification - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NovaImageCreationAPI If this is a topic that interests you, please have a look (the spec is not very long) and join the conversation. Please note that this blueprint follows on from proof of concept work for native image building discussed on this list in April: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-April/007157.html In one of the cloud product that I work on has same feature and when I looked at OpenStack I was thinking why we should rely on third party tool for this and do not have OpenStack backed solution. I think I can help to add autoyast. I have not tried this tool yet. I will try it and let you know. Thanks and Regards Noorul ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
