+1 on both from my side.
Regards,
Thomas
From: Sahdev P Zala spz...@us.ibm.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 17/08/2015 21:38
Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat-translator] Nominating new core reviewers
Hello,
I am glad to nominate Vahid
+1 on both from me!
Cheers,
Thomas
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 31/07/2015 06:37
Subject: [openstack-dev] Proposing Kanagaraj Manickam and Ethan Lynn
for heat-core
I believe the heat project would
From: Jay Dobies jason.dob...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 22/06/2015 19:22
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][tripleo]Recursive validation for
easier composability
On 06/22/2015 12:19 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
Lately I've been giving some thought to
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 29/01/2015 17:47
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat][Keystone] Native keystone resources in
Heat
I got a question today about creating keystone users/roles/tenants in
Heat
+1 on all changes.
Regards,
Thomas
From: Angus Salkeld asalk...@mirantis.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 28/01/2015 02:40
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat] core team changes
Hi all
After having a look at the
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 12/01/2015 21:16
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][tripleo] Making diskimage-
builder install from forked repo?
On 09/01/15 07:06, Gregory Haynes wrote:
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2015-01-08
Hi Yasunori,
you can submit a blueprint spec as a gerrit review to the heat-specs
repository [1].
I would suggest to have a look at some existing specs that already got
accepted to have an example for the format, important sections etc.
All kilo related specs are in a kilo sub-directory in the
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message on 14/10/2014 23:38:46:
snip
Regarding the process of building base images, the currently documented
way
[1] of using diskimage-builder turns out to be a bit unstable
sometimes.
Not because diskimage-builder is unstable, but probably because it
pulls in
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 14/10/2014 23:52:41:
snip
Regarding the process of building base images, the currently documented
way
[1] of using diskimage-builder turns out to be a bit unstable sometimes.
Not because diskimage-builder is unstable, but probably because it pulls
in
Hi all,
I have been experimenting a lot with Heat software config to check out
what works today, and to think about potential next steps.
I've also worked on an internal project where we are leveraging software
config as of the Icehouse release.
I think what we can do now from a user's
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message on 23/09/2014 11:37:42:
snip
On the other hand, there is a big downside to having it (only) in Heat
also
- you're dependent on the operator deciding to provide it.
- You prempt the decision about integration with any higher
levelservices,
e.g
From: Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 19/09/2014 07:15
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] naming of provider template for docs
Angus Salkeld asalk...@mirantis.com wrote on
From: Tao Tao t...@us.ibm.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Shu Tao shu...@us.ibm.com, Yan Yan YY Hu
yanya...@cn.ibm.com, Bo B Yang yang...@cn.ibm.com
Date: 01/08/2014 22:19
Subject: [openstack-dev] [HEAT] Qestions on adding a new Software
Config element for Opscode Chef
Hi,
I think the problem could be that you need one network port for each
server, but you just have one OS::Neutron::Port resource defined.
yulin...@dell.com wrote on 16/07/2014 08:17:00:
From: yulin...@dell.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 16/07/2014 08:20
Subject: [openstack-dev]
From: Pavlo Shchelokovskyy pshchelokovs...@mirantis.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 14/07/2014 16:42
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Nova-network support
Hi Heaters,
I would like to start a discussion about Heat
From: Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 07/07/2014 10:39
Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Update behavior for CFN compatible
resources
Hi all,
Recently I've been adding review comments, and having IRC discussions
about
changes to update behavior for
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 27/06/2014 00:10
Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Sergey Kraynev for heat-core
I'd like to nominate Sergey Kraynev for heat-core. His reviews are
valuable and prolific, and his
Excerpt from Zane Bitter's message on 29/05/2014 20:57:10:
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 29/05/2014 20:59
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] [Heat] Mid-cycle
collaborative meetup
snip
BTW one timing option I haven't seen
Excerpts from Lingxian Kong's message on 15/05/2014 22:51:33:
From: Lingxian Kong anlin.k...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 15/05/2014 22:53
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Heat SoftwareConfig and
steps for Heat Software Orchestration
On 29/04/14 01:41, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 28/04/2014 01:25:29:
I'm with Clint on this one. Heat-engine cannot know the true state
of a server just by monitoring what has been polled and signaled.
Since it can't
next Thursday.
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-design-summit-heat-translator
Regards,
Thomas
From: Thomas Spatzier/Germany/IBM@IBMDE
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 06/05/2014 10:47
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev
Relay, etc)?
-
Dimitri
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/Vision
On 05/05/14 19:21, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Hi all,
I mentioned in some earlier mail that we have started to implement a
TOSCA
YAML to HOT translator on stackforge as project heat-translator. We
Hi all,
I mentioned in some earlier mail that we have started to implement a TOSCA
YAML to HOT translator on stackforge as project heat-translator. We have
been lucky to get a session allocated in the context of the Open source @
OpenStack program for the Atlanta summit, so I wanted to share
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 28/04/2014 01:25:29:
snip
#1 Enable software components for full lifecycle:
snip
So in a short, stripped-down version, SoftwareConfigs could look like
my_sw_config:
type: OS::Heat::SoftwareConfig
properties:
create_config: # the hook for
preparation - Next
steps for Heat Software Orchestration
On 24 Apr 2014, at 01:43, Ruslan Kamaldinov rkamaldi...@mirantis.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Thomas Spatzier
thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com wrote:
#2 Enable add-hoc actions on software components:
Cool, coincidentally
Hi Clint,
thanks for the comments. Those are some really good points. I added some
more thoughts from my side below.
Exceprts from Clint Byrum's message on 24/04/2014 17:53:40:
snip
So in a short, stripped-down version, SoftwareConfigs could look like
my_sw_config:
type:
Excerpts from Jay Pipes' jaypi...@gmail.com message on 23/04/2014
01:43:42:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 13:14 +0200, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
snip
* Identify key/value pairs that are relied on by all of Nova to be a
specific key and value combination, and make these things actual real
cbjc...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 23/04/2014 07:56
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for
heat-core
+1 !
On 04/23/2014 02:43 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
Resending with [Heat] in the subject line. My bad.
On 22/04/14 14:21, Zane
Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote on 20/04/2014 15:05:51:
From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 20/04/2014 15:07
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Cinder][Heat]Should we
support tags for os resources?
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 08:35 +,
Hi all,
following up on Zane's request from end of last week, I wanted to kick off
some discussion on the ML around a design summit session proposal titled
Next steps for Heat Software Orchestration. I guess there will be things
that can be sorted out this way and others that can be refined so
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 17/04/2014 00:55
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [heat-templates] [qa] [tempest]
Questions about images
On 17/04/14 09:11, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
From: Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com
To: OpenStack
From: Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 16/04/2014 01:43
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] computed package names?
On 04/15/2014 03:45 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 15/04/14 17:59, Mike
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 16/04/2014 00:46
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] computed package names?
On 15/04/14 17:59, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 04/15/2014 05:17:21 PM:
Excerpts from Zane
know if this plan sounds sane to you.
[0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/interface-types
Thanks,
Ruslan
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Thomas Spatzier
thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 04/04/2014 19:05:04:
From: Clint Byrum cl
From: Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 16/04/2014 19:58
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [heat-templates] [qa] [tempest]
Questions about images
Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com
From: Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 07/04/2014 21:45
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Managing changes to the Hot
Specification (hot_spec.rst)
On 04/07/2014 11:01 AM, Zane Bitter
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 04/04/2014 19:05:04:
From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 04/04/2014 19:06
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] [Murano] [Solum] applications inthe
cloud
Excerpts from Stan Lagun's message of
Hi Steve,
your indexing idea sounds interesting, but I am not sure it would work
reliably. The kind of matching based on names of parameters and outputs and
internal get_attr uses has very strong assumptions and I think there is a
not so low risk of false positives. What if the templates includes
From: Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 03/04/2014 07:10
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] metadata for a HOT
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 04/02/2014 05:36:43 PM:
I
Excerpts from Thomas Herve's message on 03/04/2014 09:21:05:
From: Thomas Herve thomas.he...@enovance.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 03/04/2014 09:21
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Some thoughts on the mapping
From: Keith Bray keith.b...@rackspace.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 03/04/2014 19:51
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] metadata for a HOT
Steve, agreed. Your description I believe is the conclusion that
the
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 03/04/2014 22:09
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Some thoughts on the mapping section
On 03/04/14 03:21, Thomas Herve wrote:
Speaking of offering options for selection, there is another proposal
on
now with
TOSCA-compliant layer?
We would like to join to this effort.
Thanks,
Dmitry
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Thomas Spatzier
thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
Excerpt from Zane Bitter's message on 26/03/2014 02:26:42:
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev
Shaunak Kashyap shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com wrote on 21/03/2014
05:26:50:
From: Shaunak Kashyap shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 21/03/2014 05:29
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Resource dependencies
Hi,
In a
Just out of curiosity: what is the purpose of project warm? From the wiki
page and the sample it looks pretty much like what Heat is doing.
And warm is almost HOT so could you imagine your use cases can just be
addressed by Heat using HOT templates?
Regards,
Thomas
sahid
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message on 19/03/2014 18:18:34:
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 19/03/2014 18:21
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano][Heat] MuranoPL questions?
On 19/03/14 05:00, Stan Lagun wrote:
Steven,
Agree with your
Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote on 10/03/2014 19:51:58:
From: Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 10/03/2014 19:55
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][Murano][TOSCA]
] https://github.com/stackforge/heat-translator
Regards,
Thomas
Thanks
Georgy
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Thomas Spatzier
thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
Excerpt from Zane Bitter's message on 04/03/2014 23:16:21:
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev
Hi Stan,
thanks for sharing your thoughts about Murano and relation to TOSCA. I have
added a few comments below.
From: Stan Lagun sla...@mirantis.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 05/03/2014 00:51
Subject: Re:
Forgot to provide the email addresses of Paul and Simon in my last mail:
paul.lip...@ca.com
smo...@de.ibm.com
Regards,
Thomas
From: Thomas Spatzier/Germany/IBM@IBMDE
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 05/03/2014 10:21
Hi all,
I would like to pick up the TOSCA topic brought up by Zane in his mail
below.
TOSCA is in fact a standard that seems closely aligned with the concepts
that Murano is implementing, so thanks Zane for bringing up this
discussion. I saw Georgy's reply early today where he stated that Murano
Excerpt from Zane Bitter's message on 04/03/2014 23:16:21:
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 04/03/2014 23:20
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request: Murano
On 04/03/14 00:04, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
It so happens that the
Hi Qiming,
not sure if you have already seen it, but there is some documentation
available at the following locations. If you already know it, sorry for
dup ;-)
Entry to Heat documentation:
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/
Template Guide with pointers to more details like documentation
Hi Clint,
thanks for writing this down. This is a really interesting use case and
feature, also in relation to what was recently discussed on rolling
updates.
I have a couple of thoughts and questions:
1) The overall idea seems clear to me but I have problems understanding the
detailed flow and
Thomas Herve thomas.he...@enovance.com wrote on 03/02/2014 21:46:05:
From: Thomas Herve thomas.he...@enovance.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 03/02/2014 21:52
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] [TripleO] Rolling
Hi Thomas,
I haven't looked at the details of the autoscaling design for a while, but
the first option looks more intuitive to me.
It seems to cover the same content as LaunchConfiguration, but is it
generic and therefore would provide for one common approach for all kinds
of resources.
Regards,
Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message on 27.11.2013 00:44:04:
From: Tim Schnell tim.schn...@rackspace.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 27.11.2013 00:47
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon]Heat UI related
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 26.11.2013 23:29:06:
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 26.11.2013 23:32
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon]Heat UI related
requirements roadmap
On 11/27/2013 11:02 AM, Christopher Armstrong
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 27.11.2013 22:56:16:
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 27.11.2013 23:00
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon]Heat UI related
requirements roadmap
On 27/11/13 19:57, Jay Pipes wrote:
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 21.11.2013 21:19:07:
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 21.11.2013 21:25
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration
refined after design summit discussions
On 11/21/2013 08:48 PM, Thomas
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 20.11.2013 09:51:34:
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 20.11.2013 09:55
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration
refined after design summit discussions
On 11/20/2013 09:29 PM, Clint
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 21.11.2013 00:00:47:
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 21.11.2013 00:04
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration
refined after design summit discussions
On 11/21/2013 11:41 AM, Clint
Hi all,
I have reworked the wiki page [1] I created last week to reflect
discussions we had on the mail list and in IRC. From ML discussions last
week it looked like we were all basically on the same page (with some
details to be worked out), and I hope the new draft eliminates some
confusion
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 18.11.2013 21:52:04:
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 18.11.2013 21:54
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration
refined after design summit discussions
On 11/19/2013 02:22 AM, Thomas
Hi Bartosz,
one thing that is still not clear to me:
In the discussion at the summit and in your updated architecture on the
wiki it talks about two Heat engines, one in each region, and on-top only
the dashboard. So what entity will really do the cross region
orchestration? In the discussions I
Excerpts form Clint Byrum's message on 12.11.2013 19:32:50:
From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 12.11.2013 19:35
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration
refined after design summit discussions
Excerpts from
Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote on 12.11.2013
21:27:13:
From: Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 12.11.2013 21:29
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com wrote on 12.11.2013 23:05:57:
From: Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 12.11.2013 23:09
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] really simple workflow for
Heat configuration tasks
On 12/11/13 13:04 +0100, Thomas
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 13.11.2013 18:11:18:
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 13.11.2013 18:14
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration
refined after design summit discussions
On 11/11/13 17:57, Thomas
Hi Angus,
that is an interesting idea. Since you mentioned the software config
proposal in the beginning as a related item, I guess you are trying to
solve some software config related issues with Mistral. So a few questions,
looking at this purely from a software config perspect:
Are you
Hi all,
I have just posted the following wiki page to reflect a refined proposal
for HOT software configuration based on discussions at the design summit
last week. Angus also put a sample up in an etherpad last week, but we did
not have enough time to go thru it in the design session. My
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 30.10.2013 22:33:31:
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 30.10.2013 22:36
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Comments on Steve Baker's
Proposal on HOT Software Config
On 30/10/13 20:35, Lakshminaraya
the need for HOT syntax. I
think both projects are on a good path with a lot of fun collaboration
time ahead.
Kind regards,
-Keith
On 10/24/13 7:56 AM, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
Hi all,
maybe a bit off track with respect to latest concrete discussions, but I
noticed
Hi all,
maybe a bit off track with respect to latest concrete discussions, but I
noticed the announcement of project Solum on openstack-dev.
Maybe this is playing on a different level, but I still see some relation
to all the software orchestration we are having. What are your opinions on
this?
Hi Adrian,
really intersting! I wonder what the relation to all the software
orchestration in Heat discussions is that have been going on for a while
now.
Regards,
Thomas
Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote on 23.10.2013 21:03:10:
From: Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com
To:
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 23.10.2013 00:28:17:
From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 23.10.2013 00:30
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal
Excerpts from Georgy Okrokvertskhov's message of
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 21.10.2013 23:02:47:
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 21.10.2013 23:06
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal
On 10/22/2013 08:45 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Steve Baker
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 22.10.2013 15:24:28:
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 22.10.2013 15:27
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal
On 22/10/13 09:15, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
BTW
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 22.10.2013 17:23:52:
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 22.10.2013 17:26
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal
On 22/10/13 16:35, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
Zane Bitter zbit
at 8:35 PM, Thomas Spatzier
thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 22.10.2013 17:23:52:
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 22.10.2013 17:26
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration
Hi Lakshmi,
you mentioned an example in your original post, but I did not find it. Can
you add the example?
Lakshminaraya Renganarayana lren...@us.ibm.com wrote on 18.10.2013
20:57:43:
From: Lakshminaraya Renganarayana lren...@us.ibm.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Hi Steve,
thanks a lot taking the effort to write all this down. I had a look at both
wiki pages and have some comments below. This is really from the top of my
head, and I guess I have to spend some more time thinking about it, but I
wanted to provide some feedback anyway.
On components vs.
Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com wrote on 11.10.2013 21:02:38:
From: Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 11.10.2013 21:04
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software orchestration
proposal for workflows
On 10/11/2013
Hi all,
Lakshminaraya Renganarayana lren...@us.ibm.com wrote on 10.10.2013
01:34:41:
From: Lakshminaraya Renganarayana lren...@us.ibm.com
To: Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com,
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 10.10.2013 01:37
Subject: Re:
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message
From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 09.10.2013 03:54
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software orchestration
proposal for workflows
Excerpts from Stan Lagun's message of 2013-10-08 13:53:45
, Thomas
Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
A way to achieve the same behavior as you suggest but less verbose would
be
to use relationships in HOT. We had some discussion about relationships
earlier this year and in other contexts, but this would fit here very
well.
And I think you
Thomas Hervé the...@gmail.com wrote on 02.10.2013 17:06:48:
From: Thomas Hervé the...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 02.10.2013 17:09
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Autoscale and load balancers
Hi all,
There is a small but
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 01.10.2013 08:31:44 - Excerpt:
From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 01.10.2013 08:33
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things
together for Icehouse (now featuring software
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 25.09.2013 08:46:57:
From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 25.09.2013 08:48
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things
together for Icehouse (now featuring software
Excerpt from Clint's mail on 25.09.2013 22:23:07:
I think we already have some summit suggestions for discussing HOT,
it would be good to come prepared with some visions for the future
of HOT so that we can hash these things out, so I'd like to see this
discussion continue.
Absolutely! Can
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 18.07.2013 00:00:40:
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 18.07.2013 00:08
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Long-term, how do we make heat
image/flavor name agnostic?
On 07/18/2013 08:53 AM, Gabriel Hurley
Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com wrote on 19.06.2013 03:09:34:
From: Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 19.06.2013 03:19
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Does it make sense to have a
resource-create API?
On 18/06/13 23:32 +, Adrian Otto
92 matches
Mail list logo
