On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:26:25AM -0400, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 03:14:21PM -0400, Matthew Treinish wrote:
Hi Everyone,
So as part of splitting out common functionality from tempest into a
library [1]
we need to create a new repository. Which means we have the
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 03:14:21PM -0400, Matthew Treinish wrote:
Hi Everyone,
So as part of splitting out common functionality from tempest into a library
[1]
we need to create a new repository. Which means we have the fun task of coming
up with something to name it. I'm personally
On 08/18/2014 04:57 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 06:27:19PM +0200, Marc Koderer wrote:
Hi all,
Am 15.08.2014 um 23:31 schrieb Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com:
I suggest that tempest should be the name of the import'able library, and that the integration
tests themselves
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 18:27:19 +0200
Marc Koderer m...@koderer.com wrote:
Hi all,
Am 15.08.2014 um 23:31 schrieb Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com:
I suggest that tempest should be the name of the import'able
library, and that the integration tests themselves should be what
is pulled out of
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 06:27:19PM +0200, Marc Koderer wrote:
Hi all,
Am 15.08.2014 um 23:31 schrieb Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com:
I suggest that tempest should be the name of the import'able library, and
that the integration tests themselves should be what is pulled out of the
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Marc Koderer m...@koderer.com wrote:
Hi all,
Am 15.08.2014 um 23:31 schrieb Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com:
I suggest that tempest should be the name of the import'able library,
and that the integration tests themselves should be what is pulled out of
the
2014-08-17 1:27 GMT+09:00 Marc Koderer m...@koderer.com:
Hi all,
Am 15.08.2014 um 23:31 schrieb Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com:
I suggest that tempest should be the name of the import'able library, and
that the integration tests themselves should be what is pulled out of the
current Tempest
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Jay Pipes wrote:
I suggest that tempest should be the name of the import'able library, and
that the integration tests themselves should be what is pulled out of the
current Tempest repository, into their own repo called
openstack-integration-tests or os-integration-tests.
I like tempest-lib personally. Especially for those just starting out and
getting their feet wet.
On Aug 16, 2014 5:36 AM, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Jay Pipes wrote:
I suggest that tempest should be the name of the import'able library,
and that the integration
Hi all,
Am 15.08.2014 um 23:31 schrieb Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com:
I suggest that tempest should be the name of the import'able library, and
that the integration tests themselves should be what is pulled out of the
current Tempest repository, into their own repo called
On 08/16/2014 12:27 PM, Marc Koderer wrote:
Hi all,
Am 15.08.2014 um 23:31 schrieb Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com:
I suggest that tempest should be the name of the import'able library, and that the
integration tests themselves should be what is pulled out of the current Tempest repository,
Hi Everyone,
So as part of splitting out common functionality from tempest into a library [1]
we need to create a new repository. Which means we have the fun task of coming
up with something to name it. I'm personally thought we should call it:
- mesocyclone
Which has the advantage of being a
What about 'teapot' (as in the idiom 'tempest in a teapot'[1])
-Drew
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempest_in_a_teapot
On 08/15/2014 01:14 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
Hi Everyone,
So as part of splitting out common functionality from tempest into a library [1]
we need to create a new
On 08/15/2014 03:26 PM, Drew Fisher wrote:
What about 'teapot' (as in the idiom 'tempest in a teapot'[1])
-Drew
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempest_in_a_teapot
Though in this case it'd be teacup in tempest, I think?
There's also a TCup project [1] that uses tempest. So, you have
OpenTest is a library for integrational and functional testing of
OpenStack cloud technology.
Sounds?
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/15/2014 03:26 PM, Drew Fisher wrote:
What about 'teapot' (as in the idiom 'tempest in a teapot'[1])
On 08/15/2014 03:14 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
Hi Everyone,
So as part of splitting out common functionality from tempest into a library [1]
we need to create a new repository. Which means we have the fun task of coming
up with something to name it. I'm personally thought we should call it:
On Aug 15, 2014, at 5:39 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/15/2014 03:14 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
Hi Everyone,
So as part of splitting out common functionality from tempest into a library
[1]
we need to create a new repository. Which means we have the fun task of
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
current Tempest repository, into their own repo called
openstack-integration-tests or os-integration-tests.
I see what you did there...
+1 anyway
dt
Dean Troyer
dtro...@gmail.com
On 2014-08-15 15:14:21 -0400 (-0400), Matthew Treinish wrote:
[...]
So as a first step I figured that I'd bring it up on the ML to see
if anyone had any other suggestions.
[...]
Twas a clever quibble. Here, a garment for it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tempest#Characters
Now I will
19 matches
Mail list logo
