On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
On 23 December 2013 17:35, Chet Burgess c...@metacloud.com wrote:
It's unclear to me what exactly constitutes writing a new patch. I can
check
out oslo.messaging, and without trying to merge the patch just go
On 22 December 2013 18:02, Chet Burgess c...@metacloud.com wrote:
On Dec 20, 2013, at 14:07 , Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
It's not your code, so you really can't propose it without them having
signed the CLA, or propose it as your own.
Is there a time limit on this sort of
On Dec 22, 2013, at 3:13 , Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 22 December 2013 18:02, Chet Burgess c...@metacloud.com wrote:
On Dec 20, 2013, at 14:07 , Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
It's not your code, so you really can't propose it without them having
On Dec 20, 2013, at 14:07 , Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
It's not your code, so you really can't propose it without them having
signed the CLA, or propose it as your own.
Is there a time limit on this sort of thing? As an example there is a
bug we opened 2 years ago
In the past, I've been able to get authors of bug fixes attached to
Launchpad bugs to sign the CLA and submit the patch through gerrit...
although, in one case it took quite a bit of time (and thankfully it wasn't
a critical fix or anything).
This scenario just came up again (example: [1]), so
On 12/20/2013 09:32 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
In the past, I've been able to get authors of bug fixes attached to
Launchpad bugs to sign the CLA and submit the patch through gerrit...
although, in one case it took quite a bit of time (and thankfully it
wasn't a critical fix or anything).
