Have one question: there is for ex. freetype in my system installed as
RPM. Does YaST know where from is this RPM installed
(DVD/update/packman/etc.)?
--
Rafał Miłecki
* Rafał Miłecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jul 05. 2007 13:13]:
Have one question: there is for ex. freetype in my system installed as
RPM. Does YaST know where from is this RPM installed
(DVD/update/packman/etc.)?
No, not in openSUSE 10.2
We are working on a solution, though.
Klaus
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 20:23:20 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Method of managing updates is hard to create but is also hightly
needed. Lack of updaing applications from 3rd party repositories may
be really dangerous.
Don't mix upgrading with updating. Guru and packman just upgrade the packages.
2007/7/5, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 20:23:20 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Method of managing updates is hard to create but is also hightly
needed. Lack of updaing applications from 3rd party repositories may
be really dangerous.
Don't mix upgrading with
* Adrian Schröter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jul 04. 2007 09:37]:
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 02:43:02 wrote Carlos E. R.:
Ahhh... oops, right. Mmm... Then, show what is updatable for each repo,
perhaps show a list by repo?
I would like to avoid user confusing by showing a large numbers of repos
* Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jul 04. 2007 02:51]:
Klaus Kaempf escribió:
* Carlos E. R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jul 03. 2007 11:32]:
There might be even another approach - updating by repository.
Why not find out what is updatable and show a list where I can choose
from? Ie, a selection to
Klaus Kaempf escribió:
* Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jul 04. 2007 02:51]:
Klaus Kaempf escribió:
* Carlos E. R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jul 03. 2007 11:32]:
There might be even another approach - updating by repository.
Why not find out what is updatable and show a list where I can choose
from?
On 04/07/07, Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that smart is capable of manage it.
You can have a look at the source to see what is doing.
Smart handles this quite badly, it just blindly upgrades to newer
versioned packages regardless of the vendor/repository.
_
Benjamin Weber
Benji Weber escribió:
Smart handles this quite badly, it just blindly upgrades to newer
versioned packages regardless of the vendor/repository.
Yup, smart is no model of good behaviuor in this case...and better not
to talk about the mess it produces in 64 bit systems..;-)
signature.asc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benji Weber schreef:
On 04/07/07, Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that smart is capable of manage it.
You can have a look at the source to see what is doing.
Smart handles this quite badly, it just blindly upgrades to newer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Wednesday 2007-07-04 at 10:45 +0200, Klaus Kaempf wrote:
* Adrian Schröter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jul 04. 2007 09:37]:
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 02:43:02 wrote Carlos E. R.:
Ahhh... oops, right. Mmm... Then, show what is updatable for each
2007/7/4, Carlos E. R. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Wednesday 2007-07-04 at 10:45 +0200, Klaus Kaempf wrote:
* Adrian Schröter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jul 04. 2007 09:37]:
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 02:43:02 wrote Carlos E. R.:
Ahhh... oops, right.
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 13:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
2007/7/4, Carlos E. R. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anyway, I suppose that if the user has activated a dozen repos, he must
be prepared for some confussion, but he surely must be interested in
knowing what is new from all, sorted somehow.
* Benji Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jul 02. 2007 22:51]:
There are also other things to be decided, like how to resolve package
vendor bouncing where the user has e.g. guru kde-backports
repositories subscribed and the updater first updates to one then the
other version of amarok, gaining and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Tuesday 2007-07-03 at 09:06 +0200, Klaus Kaempf wrote:
...
There might be even another approach - updating by repository.
Why not find out what is updatable and show a list where I can choose
from? Ie, a selection to choose aside from
* Carlos E. R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jul 03. 2007 11:32]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Tuesday 2007-07-03 at 09:06 +0200, Klaus Kaempf wrote:
...
There might be even another approach - updating by repository.
Why not find out what is updatable and show a list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Tuesday 2007-07-03 at 13:48 +0200, Klaus Kaempf wrote:
There might be even another approach - updating by repository.
Why not find out what is updatable and show a list where I can choose
from? Ie, a selection to choose aside from
Klaus Kaempf escribió:
* Carlos E. R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jul 03. 2007 11:32]:
There might be even another approach - updating by repository.
Why not find out what is updatable and show a list where I can choose
from? Ie, a selection to choose aside from security patches only / all.
The
Den Monday 02 July 2007 22:12:01 skrev Rafał Miłecki:
Could some
developer focus on this bug before publishing 10.3? It wouldn't be nice to
remove ZMD and don't give any alternative wayof watching repositories for
updates of _any_ kind (not these securityones only).
I think Duncan stated the
-On 02/07/07, Rafał Miłecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a well-discused bug on bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216097 about
opensuse-updater.
I posted some idea of resolving this, which I find quite fine. You can
find this in comment #57:
20 matches
Mail list logo
