[OS-webwork] xdoclet module

2003-07-22 Thread Brock Bulger
There was interest earlier on the list for an XDoclet module to automatically generate the XWork *-validation.xml files. I've put together a module that you can use in your XWork/WebWork2 projects. The attached zip file contains the module jar file, an example class marked up with tags

Re: [OS-webwork] xdoclet module

2003-07-22 Thread Brock Bulger
with the same alias name.. Jason -Original Message-From: Brock Bulger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 6:28 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [OS-webwork] xdoclet module There was interest earlier on the list

Re: [OS-webwork] Xwork IoC requirements

2003-07-11 Thread Brock Bulger
I was reading you comments on the pico issue and thought that this was a strange use case. Why would you define an Action used by your swing app with component dependencies that had to be set in the ClientDispatcherServlet? I would think you would just proxy your data or model to a custom

Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork2, here I come!

2003-07-02 Thread Brock Bulger
Here are my observations on the Action issue: From a framework standpoint it doesn't really matter if there is an explicit execute() method to call on the underlying object. The default behavior is to call this method if no method is specified. So I don't think we lose anything by changing the

Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork2, here I come!

2003-07-02 Thread Brock Bulger
PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:57 PM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork2, here I come! Uhm - just FYI the result types are currently in Action interface, so anything that implements it gets those :) M On 3/7/03 8:47 AM, Brock Bulger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the words: Here are my

Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork2, here I come!

2003-07-02 Thread Brock Bulger
I might have missed something. See below. - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 8:26 PM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork2, here I come! See below... -Original Message- From: Brock Bulger [mailto

Re: [OS-webwork] WW2 ActionContext

2003-03-24 Thread Brock Bulger
I believe this is similiar to the issue I had when I ported over the URLTag. I think you meant to say that the following line will return null when called outside of an action execution: OgnlValueStack stack = ActionContext.getContext().getValueStack(); I have also been working on the BeanTag

[OS-webwork] URLTag, test and taglib patch

2003-03-23 Thread Brock Bulger
See the attached URLTag class, JUnit test and taglib patch. I removed the deprecated page attribute as the implementation defaulted to using it as the value attribute. The original URLTag used the BeanUtils.getStringValue() which uses PropertyEditors. I vaguely recall some discussions about

[OS-webwork] ParamTag: patch

2003-03-22 Thread Brock Bulger
I started porting over the existing URLTag to work in WebWork 2 and ran into a slight problem. The URLTag supports using the param tag within it. The current implementation of ParamTag uses the ValueStack to set the parameter on the parent tag. If the ValueStack is null then no parameters get set