I kind of agree with this. I think a wiki is fine for collaborative
documentation but now that everything is in final release, it's probably
time for a new form of docs. An example of how poor the docs are on the
wiki: there are 2 or 3 separate links for the tag references and only one of
them
I think that's dependent on the servlet container. I know that Orion/oc4j is
much faster than Tomcat with JSPs. If I were forced to use Tomcat, then
velocity would be more compelling.
Personally, I find velocity easier to use because it just seems more focused
to the task at hand with MVC view
I have something similar to what Jason suggested with Sitemesh working in a
few apps. There's a search box in a sitemesh decorator on the left side of
the screen, with its own little form calling an action. The action forwards
to a result page, that is still decorated by the same sitemesh
Again, I've had success without putting any properties in WEB-INF. I put
everything in the classpath (under WEB-INF/classes) and everything works
for me. The key was referencing my velocity.properties file from my
webwork.properties file. This is on Oracle oc4j and orion 2.0, so if you're
I definitely know that it works, b/c the improvement is pretty noticeable.
Here's what I have:
-webworks.properties in classpath
-velocity.properties in classpath
-webworks.properties includes the following line:
webwork.velocity.configfile=velocity.properties
That last bit might be the key.
or
recommended velocity.properties file (and where it needs to be, either
classpath or WEB-INF dont know) on the wiki and whatever else needs to be
done to enable caching of the templates
Drew McAuliffe wrote:
I definitely know that it works, b/c the improvement is pretty noticeable.
Here's what I have
My velocity.properties works in the classpath. This is with oracle oc4j
(similar to orion).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dag
Liodden
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 6:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AW: [OS-webwork]
What type of value is the check interval specified in? Seconds?
Milliseconds? Also, does this require the latest ww2 from CVS or is this
just something that can be turned on in the latest beta release?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
t) then it will just re-render the same page again without
executing the action. This includes if you chain to another Action.
-Original Message-From: Drew McAuliffe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 5:50
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[OS-webwork] Act
In answer to my previous question, it looks like the modification check
interval is specified in seconds. That's what I understood from looking over
the velocity docs.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Fernando Martins
Sent: Saturday,
Is there any
standard way for dealing with messages that are passed between an action and a
redirect result? As I understand it, once a redirect is done, a new request is
created and any messages you may have stored in an action (via actionErrors or
something hanging off of the action
Title: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 1.4.1
you mean imminent?
I thought it was already released.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Skip WalkerSent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 10:12
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[OS-webwork] xwork 1.0 release
Is this still
k WoonSent: Friday, January 16, 2004 12:53 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [OS-webwork]
How to redirect to a page with parameters?
Drew McAuliffe wrote:
I do this sort of thing a lot. I'm not sure if the
approach you're taking in your xwork file is the right way but it could be. I
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] How to redirect to a page with parameters?
this is the first time ive ever seen this parse param being used (and i'd
been using redirect result without it just fine so far), whats the
difference between parse being either true or false?
Drew McAuliffe wrote:
I
I do this sort of thing a lot. I'm not sure if the approach
you're taking in your xwork file is the right way but it could be. I do know
that I've had success with the following:
action name="foo"
class="test.FooAction" !-- results
-- result name="input"
type="redirect" param
Again, it sounds like you still have a parameter configured
as a direct child of the "result" element rather than as a child of the "action"
element. Xwork is attempting to set "objClass" on the result, and the result
doesn't have any such property. Your action does.
From:
[EMAIL
12, 2003, at 8:47 AM, Drew McAuliffe wrote:
Unfortunately, that's like saying if I don't like commons-logging, I
shouldn't be forced to use it. Or if I don't like ognl, I shouldn't
be forced to use it. You can't make every dependency in the library
pluggable.
The only reason I could see
Unfortunately, that's like saying if I don't like commons-logging, I
shouldn't be forced to use it. Or if I don't like ognl, I shouldn't be
forced to use it. You can't make every dependency in the library pluggable.
The only reason I could see velocity becoming a barrier to your work with
webwork
are:
'if I don't want to use ognl-expressions, I should not need ognl'
'if I don't want to use jasper reports, I should not need jasper reports'
'if I don't want to use oracle, I should not need to install it'
On Dec 12, 2003, at 8:47 AM, Drew McAuliffe wrote:
Unfortunately, that's like saying if I
complain have to be accepted. Maybe it's right position.
- Original Message -
From: Drew McAuliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:47 PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WebWorks without velocity how to
Unfortunately, that's like saying if I don't like
Do you know examples of when the "referer" header doesn't
exist? Is it a servlet engine thing? I'm extremely curious because I depend on
the "RefererResult" quite a bit. I'm very interested in knowing ahead of time in
what situations that header value won't exist. FYI, on Tomcat and Oracle
I've had success with that using a Referrer result, adopted from ww1.x. It
looks something like this. The key is to get the previous location from the
referer attribute of the request (REFERER_KEY = referer), which contains
the previous result. My version does a little extra, making sure that any
I think if you're putting it in single quotes, it is evaluated literally,
not against the stack. What about
#tag( Form name='myform' action=$tag.params.actionName method='GET' )
As I understand it, parameters supplied within the tag directive body are
always evaluated against the stack (which is
If you call $stack.push($value), then whatever is set to $value will be at
the top of the stack. WOuld that work?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pfeifer
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 7:52 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:
I suppose retarded is in the eye of the beholder...:)
I don't know about it from a JSTL point of view, but velocity uses this
syntax, as does the evaluation that goes on in the xwork config file, as
does Ant, etc. I find it to be very clear. In brackets led by a $, this is
a variable that should
I agree, and I think that it should be the ${} syntax. The reason I like the
optional syntax is solely for backwards compatibility.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rickard Öberg
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of boxed
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 2:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] OGNL madness - evaluated tag attributes
Drew McAuliffe wrote:
I agree, and I think that it should be the ${} syntax
This raises an issue I've had with the ognl conversion. Is there a way to
make it so that conversion errors don't throw an ugly servlet error, but
rather add an action error to the action? Maybe through an interceptor? I'm
still having problems with unsupplied dates b/c I haven't heard of the OGNL
Title: RE: [OS-webwork] Spring & WW2 -- Status Update
Spring is primarily an IOC framework that happens to have
its own web framework. Webwork is primarily a web framework that happens to have
its own IOC framework. The IOC in webwork is a bit simpler than the one in
Spring, though it works
I kind of agree. I think triple-quoting simple parameters
like "name" is kind of silly. In fact, I've never really liked the
triple-quoting much at all (it seems unwieldy to me), though I understand the
need for it. To me, it might be easier to just ditch the whole triple-quote
thing and do
I'd also like to see the IDE-specific files removed. Mainly because the
eclipse ones don't work for me, and I have to recreate project settings
anyway. Also, there's the question of different IDE versions (at least in
Eclipse, though I'm not sure how variant the project files are b/w 2.x and
3).
for everyone? Got an suggestions for the names of the
directives?
-Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Drew McAuliffe
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Param directive
As I
.
Richard HALLIER
Chef de projet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
01.40.12.41.52
www.uniclick.org
UNICLICK
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Drew
McAuliffe Envoye : mardi 18 novembre 2003 00:15 A :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Param directive
As I
for instance).
I hope I convince you to keep as a standard the data access via the stack.
Richard HALLIER
Chef de projet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
01.40.12.41.52
www.uniclick.org
UNICLICK
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de
Drew McAuliffe
The pushes and pops were necessary before recent changes made it possible to
pass in objects directly to the velocity directive. Also, there is now talk
about having two separate tags, one that does a stack.findValue
automatically and one that doesn't. Your second example shows that
parameters
I had noticed the behavior before, which was automatically calling
stack.findValue(), and expressed my opinion that this was problematic when
using velocity, especially when trying to use the component tag. The biggest
problem that the former behavior had, that the latest update fixes, is that
I
As I said in another reply, the biggest problem is that you can't use an
object variable in velocity, since it always gets converted to a string
first. If I have a collection of model objects, and want to call a component
tag with them in an iteration through the collection, I can't, because a
Using earlier advice from Jason, I've been able to set this in a
servletcontextlistener, as follows:
Java class:
public class WebworkGlobalMessagesListener implements ServletContextListener
{
private static Logger log =
Logger.getLogger(WebworkGlobalMessagesListener.class);
(the ones defined in param elements in your xwork.xml inside
the action element) are set before getModel() and the request parameters
are set afterwards.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:14 PM
To: [EMAIL
] On Behalf Of Drew
McAuliffe
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 10:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] More about velocity directives
I couldn't find my previous email on the SF list yet to keep this reply
there, but I believe I understand now why the velocity directives act the
way they do
That's consistent with numbers I've found in migrating one app from 1.3 to
2.0. I've always held out hope that this was just something that
optimization could take care of. In the meantime, my performance isn't
terrible, but it doesn't fly like it did in 1.3, either. Here's hoping the
optimization
This would explain why I wasn't able to reset the object at the top of the
stack in an after call and see the results. +1 from me for this
functionality. Though perhaps the AroundInterceptor should be modified or
extended so that there's something as simple to use as it is now, with
specific
Scratch my last comment; your example is exactly what I had in mind as a new
superclass to use for this kind of functionality. I think such a superclass
would be a great addition to the framework, though it would have to be
documented very well so that the difference between before, beforeResult,
I'm using the modeldriveninterceptor to populate the model objects in my
actions. For save and add operations, this works fine. For loading
operations, I'm having some problems. My load code looks something like
this:
this.model = saveCustomer(customer, session);
In this case, the model instance
have to say I agree that this
makes things much neater - good idea!
It would break existing Velocity uses though. Are you using the latest WW2
CVS with Velocity? (We're having problems upgrading to it)
Cheers,
Mike
On 12/11/03 5:24 PM, Drew McAuliffe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the words:
I
In a recent message, I described a problem I had with the model object of a
ModelDriven action. The model object is pushed onto the top of the stack by
the ModelDrivenInterceptor but after updates to the model in the action, the
value at the top of the stack isn't the same as the updated model.
and
modeldriven
Please post your Action code... I'm suspecting it's 4)
-Original Message-
From: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Further weirdness with the valuestack and
modeldriven
I've been having a problem with using the addActionError method of
ActionSupport in my actions. For some reason that I couldn't figure out,
every time I tried to call this method, I was receiving an
UnsupportedOperationException. The action errors always seemed to be stored
as an unmodifiable
I am using velocity for my output and have found the component tags to be
useful. I have found, however, that I'm not quite sure about how the
velocity context and the value stack interact. Specifically, how can I get a
component directive to work cleanly with a variable that exists in the
I couldn't find my previous email on the SF list yet to keep this reply
there, but I believe I understand now why the velocity directives act the
way they do. In my post, I indicated that it would be easier to pass objects
from the velocity context into bodytag params if you could do so without
I'm having some trouble getting the ui tags to work with velocity. I have a
reference to the tag location in webwork.properties, but I still get the
following exception:
2003-10-29 23:31:53,251 [ERROR] ui.AbstractUITag - Could not generate UI
template
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
I had to register as an observer to get access, but it's a relatively
painless process.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason
Carreira
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 1:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] webwork2 cvs
Same, let me know if I can help. I'm not a committer or anything, but I'm
interested in helping speed the process up.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cuong
Tran
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 5:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Ignore my last comment; this looks like it should take care of it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason
Carreira
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 5:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Converters not used on property
I realize that this may be more of an issue for the java.net people, but has
anyone had any success in getting the new CVS repositories to work with
Eclipse's CVS integration? I haven't but the last I tried was a couple of
weeks ago. Also, maybe the M4 build of Eclipse 3.0 works?
I've used an interceptor to perform similar functionality without any
problems, except I don't return LOGIN, I return ERROR. This is for
authorization rather than authentication, since authorization involves
checking rights; authentication is just checking that you are who you say
you are. If you
It's been a while, but I think my JDBC driver was returning an instance of
Timestamp, not java.sql.Date. Not sure if that means your suggestion
wouldn't work. The driver was Oracle's thin driver.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Frederick
Think...in Russian!
[vague movie reference]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James
Pan
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Newbie: internationalization for Russian
Hi,
I'm trying to
times growing up. :)
-Tim.
Quoting Drew McAuliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Think...in Russian!
[vague movie reference]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
James Pan
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
This goes back to a JIRA issue I filed about the VelocityManager and the
velocity servlet. Before, in ww1, you could subclass the velocity servlet
and add things you wanted to the velocity context. Now, you can't, because
of the way the VelocityManager is set up. It would be (still!) great if it
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason CarreiraSent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 6:06
PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] single i18n
catalog for multiple actions?
I would
probably do it in a servlet init or a
ServletContextListener
-Original
Message-From: Drew
McAuliffe
Is there support for providing a resource key instead of a
text label, so that the label comes from a getText() call? If I'm understanding
your proposed change correctly, you could just say
ww:textfield label="getText(name.middle)"
name="name.middle"/
Or does that work? Will "name.middle"
]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] CVS problems
Alright alright, don't let Hani bait you. I pretty much agree with you,
I suggest you complain to java.net. While you're at it, can you ask them
WTF happened to our clickstream and sitemesh projects? :)
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: Drew McAuliffe
What happens if you're using another interceptor in a chain, and it
throws an error that halts processing? Will your hibernate interceptor
be able to close off any resources it opened?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Anoop Ranganath
Sent:
I'm against Pico support, only because I don't like the idea of forcing
my components to have constructors. I'd rather implement an interface
than kind of implement an implicit interface by using strict
constructor rules. If support is added back in for Pico, I'd rather it
be optional, like the
Title: Message
Where
would one add a call to "addDefaultResourceBundle"? In the servlet init? Or is
there a more "webwork-friendly" place to do it, like in some sort of filter init
or an application scoped component?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm having problems getting the latest from the new CVS repository.
Neither the anoncvs or the guest/guest logins work. Does anyone have the
valid guest account name, and can the java.net site be updated with it?
Thanks,
Drew
---
This sf.net
I'm having trouble with OGNL outputting date values from a database
read. Date fields in my object get populated with Timestamp objects (a
sql specific subclass of Date). If I try to output field dateLogged on
object myObject using the following call,
$!{ognl.findValue(dateLogged, $myObject)}
I
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hani Suleiman
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] CVS problems
Just apply for an observer role in the webwork project.
On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 08:20 PM, Drew McAuliffe wrote:
I'm
If I have a model driven action (the action uses the md interceptor and
implements the interface), are my other action properties still
available for setting using the parameters interceptor?
For example, I have an action like this:
public class MyAction extends MyBaseAction implements
Of
Drew McAuliffe
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Converters not used on property get?
I'm having trouble with OGNL outputting date values from a database
read. Date fields in my object get populated with Timestamp objects (a
sql specific subclass
converters.
We could add this to the XworkBasicConverter and have it treat it the
same as a date?
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 8:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Converters not used on property get
]
*Assunto:* RE: [OS-webwork] Component repository
If people add them to Jira issues, we'll put them in CVS to go
into
the
distribution...
-Original Message-
*From:* Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:01 AM
+1 on this. I think there's something like this working for messages
coming from the validation framework, but I'd definitely like to see it
work with normal error messages. Should be pretty simple, using
java.text stuff (though I don't know how it impacts performance).
-Original
editor components,
and rework them to be WW2 components.
Now, I just gotta find me some time to implement that
:)
[]'s -cv
-Mensagem original- De: Drew
McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 2 de outubro de 2003 13:58
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: Message
If
someone has a datepicker component available, I would love to get access to it
right away.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason CarreiraSent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:46
AMTo: [EMAIL
Being able to do this was one of the big wins for me moving to ww2. In
ww1 I had to use some awful hacks. +1 on agreeing that this is in there
and it works.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robert Douglass
Sent: Wednesday, September 24,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't there only one real way to implement
an action, and that's to implement Action? ActionSupport is an
implementation of Action, so by extending it, you by default implement
Action. So, only by implementing the interface directly or by
extending an existing
Last I checked (about a month ago), it wasn't there. There are no macros
in ww2 like there were in ww1. I think everyone keeps assuming they are,
but they're not. Also, the same objects aren't on the velocity stack
(like the webwork utility that does a lot of other useful stuff like
this :-)
http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-251
Regards
Jonas
Drew McAuliffe wrote:
It's been a while since I tried playing with the ww2 tags
in velocity
but I was curious. Last I checked, it looked like the only
tags that
had equivalents in velocity were the ui
It's been a while since I tried playing with the ww2 tags in velocity
but I was curious. Last I checked, it looked like the only tags that had
equivalents in velocity were the ui tags. Do the other tags have
velocity equivalents, or are there plans for velocity macro replacements
for them (like in
] Persisting error messages across a redirect?
See below... Let me know if this helps.
-Original Message-
From: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Persisting error messages across a redirect
I've got a BA in German languages and literature, so there you have it.
I think an MA might be more useful in think-tank type positions or at
a college but in the business world I've rarely seen someone get hired
over someone else because of more CS education. Out in the real world,
it's
Is there any kind of functionality in webwork or xwork that will allow
error messages to persist across a redirect result? Or is there some
other set of functions I can use to achieve what I need? Here's what I'm
looking for:
I have a user admin page that allows user to change their passwords.
That seems to be a bit awkward, especially since there's no multiple
inheritence in Java. I don't mind using base classes to aggregate
functionality, but just to have a pointer for xwork to find? That seems
a bit much. Also, it would be nice if there were a way to specify the
resource bundle so
Message-
From: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 4:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Re: Performance diff bw ww1 and ww2?
I've created two sample applications that show the
performance difference. The problem is that I have two zip
files
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Simplicity of WW2
Hey, just out of interest,what are you using Xwork for standalone?
-Original Message-
From: Drew McAuliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS
Agreed. I like things being simple but I don't like making things
confusing and awkward in the name of simplicity.
If some sort of default action thing does get put in, though, I would
recommend that it be specific to webwork. Xwork doesn't need it; it's
really only appropriate for simplifying
I would agree with a previous poster that forcing the use of
fully-qualified names is actually less error prone. It may be a longer
string but that doesn't mean it's harder to use (ms worth of typing
saved). The big advantage is that refactoring tools will be able to find
the references correctly,
I would argue against anything that would increase the possibility of
subtle errors. If a solution like the one you suggest could be done
while fireproofing against problems when classes change packages, then
I wouldn't be so against it. I just hate having to track down subtle
bugs in a system
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Drew McAuliffe
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 3:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Re: Performance diff bw ww1 and ww2?
I've moved from Tomcat to oc4j and the numbers have improved
considerably. So at this point, it's not a complete hassle
I've been trying to migrate an application recently from ww1 to ww2 and
have had some pretty difficult times. Conversion issues aside, though,
I'm extremely concerned with what I see with the performance. ww2 seems
to perform about 5 to 10 times worse than my equivalent application in
ww1. I'm
Something I found difficult to figure out is what the recommended
replacements are in ww2 for the old ww1 macros. Things like evaluate,
action, bean, includeservlet, execute, etc. These macros used to
call methods on the $webwork helper, which was placed in the I had to
play around some to find,
somewhere? (I'm on a bus so no website access
right now)
Cheers,
Mike
On 12/8/03 8:23 AM, Drew McAuliffe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the
words:
Something I found difficult to figure out is what the recommended
replacements are in ww2 for the old ww1 macros. Things like
evaluate, action, bean
and not an EL issue?
- Original Message -
From: Drew McAuliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 3:19 PM
Subject: [OS-webwork] Re: Performance diff bw ww1 and ww2?
I've moved from Tomcat to oc4j and the numbers have improved
considerably. So at this point
Sure, I have jprofiler hooked up to my Tomcat install. The thing is, I'm
a little ignorant with it. I'll play around and see what kind of data I
can produce. Any tips on how to get what you need would be
appreciated.:) Also, here are some samples from the macros that do a lot
of the work in my
96 matches
Mail list logo
