.
Thanks for listening to my rants,
Charlie
On Feb 24, 2004, at 4:56 AM, Lars Fischer wrote:
So what is so wrong with the WW2 docs?
They're outdated and incomplete, a useful example is missing.
The example war doesn't work with WebLogic. Navigation sucks with this
WIKI thing.
Look
So what is so wrong with the WW2 docs?
They're outdated and incomplete, a useful example is missing.
The example war doesn't work with WebLogic. Navigation sucks
with this WIKI thing.
Look at Hibernate or Spring where an excellent reference manual is provided.
For the XWork/WebWork part I can
.
Regrads,
Lars
Please create Jira issues for any of these you find... I went through
and tested on WLS8.1 around beta1, but not since...
-Original Message-
From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 8:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS
on a String property?
-Original Message-
From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 6:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Empty string property now
instead of null?
IMO it is essential that is is NULL. This has
It would be nice to have the common use cases e. g. load and/or update an
object (like an employee, etc)
and handle this in an elegant way (loading an object from the database and
NOT having to reload it after submitting the updates).
There's no full implementation required (no actual database
IMO it is essential that is is NULL. This has been a problem with WW 1.2.
and has
been fixed in 1.3. It's perfectly legal for a String to be null.
If WW2 handles this as an empty String, it's a bug.
Hi,
When a form field (single textfield) is not filled, the request param is
an
empty
I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic
(taglib.tld).
Maybe the final release deserves a test with this unimportant server
(unimportant for OpenSymphony developers).
I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is
finally out. This release
filed one JIRA issue
myself today about it, but I have no idea if your issue was the same as
mine.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lars Fischer wrote:
I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with
WebLogic
(taglib.tld).
Maybe the final release deserves a test
: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
Lars, WHAT about the taglib.tld doesn't work? I filed one JIRA issue
myself today about it, but I have no idea if your issue was the same as
mine.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lars Fischer wrote:
I'm not pleased to announce that this version
(ExecuteThread.java:151)
This is not critical for me because I don't use Jasper Reports at the
moment.
Regards,
Lars
Lars Fischer wrote:
Joseph,
it's the problem where somone already provided a patch:
weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspException: (line 1): Error in using tag library
uri='webwork
like you think it should... Did you
put a debugger in there to make sure the setName() method is not called?
-Original Message-
From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 4:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Spam:RE: Spam:Re: [OS-webwork
Message-
From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 5:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Spam:RE: RE: Re: [OS-webwork] setXXX never called
Just replaced WebWork, XWork and Ognl libraries with a new
CVS version.
The setName method works
interceptor defaultStack as:
action name=doTest class=xxx.TestAction method=doTest
result name=success/index.vm/result
interceptor-ref name=defaultStack/
/action
Cheers,
Jonas
Lars Fischer wrote:
I have a simple action and a form with a text field. The problem
=dispatcher
param name=location/test/ww2/editemployee.jsp/param
/result
interceptor-ref name=defaultStack/
/action
/package
/xwork
If it still doesn't work, show us your Action class, JSP, and xwork.xml
file
-Original Message-
From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL
That was doExecute(). In WW1.3, I could call actionname!default.action
just to initialize or show a form (without declaration).
Action.execute() is it
Lars Fischer wrote:
Does WW2 have something like doDefault() contained in WW 1.3 ?
It would be nice to have a standard action without
Does WW2 have something like doDefault() contained in WW 1.3 ?
It would be nice to have a standard action without having to declare it
every time in xwork.xml.
Thanks,
Lars
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
The latest CVS version works, the beta 1 download doesn't.
Hi all! I wonder if some has experience with setting up webwork2 with bea
weblogic 8.1. I can see that there exist doc. to weblogic 6.1 ... Any help
is much welcome.
If we manage to set ww2 up for weblogic 8.1, we will add the
Hi all,
this may be a dumb question, but how do I use objects (e.g.
an ArrayList) created in a WW-action within third party
JSP tags ?
I found an example on the WIKI:
ww:property value=#session['baz']/
This doesn't work (at least if I'm using request instead of
session - didn't try session).
have to test on WLS 8.1...
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 2:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WebLogic 8.1
I'm using the example webwork-example.jar included in the
beta
)
Thanks
Lars
Which example are you using? The beta1 example-war has a problem that it
got built with Clover, so it has a dependency on the Clover jar being in
the classpath. This has been fixed in CVS and will be fixed in the next
beta.
-Original Message-
From: Lars Fischer [mailto
It's always the same ...
The war-sample provided with WW2 doesn't work with WebLogic 8.1.
Don't you guys use real world servers ?
Thanks,
Lars
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
This will cut the amount of explaining needed for a hello world type app
down by an entire step. Anyone else got ideas like this that will cut
down on the learning curve for newbies?
Of course, start with providing a tutorial.
---
This
You should give IDEA a try ...
I would think that using the fully qualified classname isn't any harder
since most of the time you are copy pasting it anyway.
Also, when using refactoring tools to rename classes, or move them, the
tools can often update xml or text files. This wouldn't
Sounds like a great idea. On the other hand it would be better to just
finish
WW2/XWork and provide useful documentation before starting another project.
WW2 development lasts long enough now. It's time to get it done.
Regards
Lars
I'd like to create an opensource web application framework
This shows again the need for a sophisticated tutorial.
Regards
Lars
I've been trying to migrate an application recently from ww1 to ww2 and
have had some pretty difficult times. Conversion issues aside, though,
I'm extremely concerned with what I see with the performance. ww2 seems
to
Initially, just CVS. It's upto each module owner/developers to decide if
they want to move or not. Basically I think the idea is to get rid of
dependencies on sourceforge, since they're, well, a shit service.
Is OpenSymphony and Atlassian also a s*** service ?
SF.net servers have been more
, at 09:11 AM, Lars Fischer wrote:
Initially, just CVS. It's upto each module owner/developers to decide
if
they want to move or not. Basically I think the idea is to get rid of
dependencies on sourceforge, since they're, well, a shit service.
Is OpenSymphony and Atlassian also a s
PROTECTED]) penned
the
words:
Well, for us we queue a JMS message. I'm not sure of another way to
start an asynch process in the J2EE spec
-Original Message-
From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
-Original Message-
From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Displaying a progress page
Jason,
thanks for the reply !
Any hint how you start the asynchronous process
PROTECTED])
penned
the
words:
Well, for us we queue a JMS message. I'm not sure of another way to
start an asynch process in the J2EE spec
-Original Message-
From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
(hehe)?
I really don't care about Opera (hehehehe).
Hani, I like your writings. Really refreshing !
On Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 03:13 PM, Lars Fischer wrote:
Lars, just out of curiosity, what is driving the requirement for not
supporting the complete browser model (no javascript
Does anyone have a good idea how to display a temporary progress page in WW
1.x ?
I have a form where users can define paremeters for an import of data into
the
local database. After submitting the page the import method is started.
This process may take a while so I want to show a general
Jason,
thanks for the reply !
Any hint how you start the asynchronous process ?
Lars
If you can start it up as an asynchronous process, you can use the trick
of having a progress page which checks some state, such as a database or
something in the session, and shows the progress bar or just
33 matches
Mail list logo
