Hello,
boxed wrote:
How about just 'out' for print? To go along with out.println etc.
Yes, as this aligns better with JSTL. The syntax of ww:out ... should
probably be the same or a superset of c:out
I know that out is the name in JSTL but I personally feel that this is an
argument
How about just 'out' for print? To go along with out.println etc.
On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 04:57 AM, Chris Miller wrote:
I'm a little uncomfortable with the names as they currently stand too.
Perhaps the 'context' tag could be renamed 'expose', and then 'focus'
could
become
My two (or three) cents:
the names aren't very important right now, as this stuff is all post-1.3 for
now. My votes would be:
-out or print (ww:out value=foo/bar/)
-push (ww:push value=fooww:out value=bar//ww:push)
-set (ww:set value=foo/bar id=blah/ ww:out value=@blah/)
-Pat
You might well want to pull something off the value stack and put it into
the session or application scope?
-mike
On 13/11/02 9:41 AM, Toby Hede ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the
words:
would the use of a general set also allow variables to be set in contexts
other then the pageContext? (as in
-out or print (ww:out value=foo/bar/)
-push (ww:push value=fooww:out value=bar//ww:push)
-set (ww:set value=foo/bar id=blah/ ww:out value=@blah/)
Yes - these are good names IMHO!
After reading lots of names, print, push and set all seem intuitively to
do
the right things?
Print a
-
From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: the names of the three new tags
You might well want to pull something off the value stack and put it into
the session or application scope?
-mike
On 13
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: the names of the three new tags
Push a variable on to the stack
I thought the stack was already filled by the time we've hit the view.
Seems to me pushing is actually poping a value off the stack and making
Beeson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: the names of the three new tags
Push a variable on to the stack
I thought the stack was already filled by the time we've hit the view.
Seems to me pushing is actually
on the stack? I
think that's a question left up to the EL folks.
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: Erik Beeson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: the names of the three new tags
I have spent some time in both PropertyTag
: the names of the three new tags
You might well want to pull something off the value stack and put it into
the session or application scope?
-mike
On 13/11/02 9:41 AM, Toby Hede ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the
words:
would the use of a general set also allow variables to be set in
contexts
10 matches
Mail list logo
