I resigned from formal association with OpenSymphony. I no longer have or
want CVS update access, or web site update capabilities, although I can
update the wiki and offer input on issues just like other users can.
What's more, since I used to be somewhat responsible for the care and
feeding of
Well, from my part, I'll toy with getting it in sandbox right away.
- Original Message -
From: Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Hidden token
Vedovato Paolo wrote:
that is a very important feature
Title: Message
Well,
it really came down to usability issues. We looked at things like having to have
separate FormBeans tied to the Actions 1-1 (because you have to cast to the
expected FormBean subclass). Also,we looked at some sample code for Struts
and Webwork (we looked at code for
-Original Message-
From: Robert Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Hidden token
I think the only reason Struts needs the ui:form is to associate the
form to the form bean.
I'm against
-Original Message-
From: Robert Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Hidden token
If I quickly hit the the submit button twice what happens?
What guarantee is there that the execution of
-Original Message-
From: matt baldree [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Hidden token
I have the code ;). I can add it if it is what people want
but Rickard has a point in trying to make this more
I've been looking at BeanUtil.java and I was looking at the copy method.
given that the fieldMaps are cached in objectMap wouldn't it make more
sense
to use
static protected PropertyDescriptor getPropertyDescriptor(String
property, Ob
ject obj)
instead of the inner loop?
Couldn't you do a
