Re: [Openvpn-devel] Problem with alloc_buf_gc function

2011-12-13 Thread Gert Doering
Hi On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:22:36PM +, Tiran Kaskas wrote: > The problem is that the nl package was built with 2.1 version, and I have > used this. 2.1+nl patches is fine. 2.0 is not what you want. > On a different topic: I found an issue, you probably want to fix that: > In

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Problem with alloc_buf_gc function

2011-12-13 Thread Tiran Kaskas
The problem is that the nl package was built with 2.1 version, and I have used this. On a different topic: I found an issue, you probably want to fix that: In reliable_pid_in_range1() function, the third parameter(extent) is an unsigned int. However, this function is being called by

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Only warn about non-tackled IPv6 packets once

2011-12-13 Thread David Sommerseth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13/12/11 18:14, David Sommerseth wrote: > When using OpenVPN 2.2 on clients and server with Windows based > clients, it will try to push IPv6 packets through the tunnel. This > causes the server log to be filled up with log entries like this: >

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Only warn about non-tackled IPv6 packets once

2011-12-13 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 06:14:00PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > When using OpenVPN 2.2 on clients and server with Windows based > clients, it will try to push IPv6 packets through the tunnel. This > causes the server log to be filled up with log entries like this: > > Wed Jun 29

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Only warn about non-tackled IPv6 packets once

2011-12-13 Thread David Sommerseth
When using OpenVPN 2.2 on clients and server with Windows based clients, it will try to push IPv6 packets through the tunnel. This causes the server log to be filled up with log entries like this: Wed Jun 29 22:12:51 2011 username/1.2.3.4:56990 Need IPv6 code in mroute_extract_addr_from_packet

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Problem with alloc_buf_gc function

2011-12-13 Thread Adriaan de Jong
> -Original Message- > From: Gert Doering [mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de] > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:32:51AM +, Tiran Kaskas wrote: > > Is there a problem connecting a client running 2.1.4 (the one with > polarssl) to a server running 2.0.9? > > Well, the default crypto algorithms

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Problem with alloc_buf_gc function

2011-12-13 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:32:51AM +, Tiran Kaskas wrote: > Is there a problem connecting a client running 2.1.4 (the one with polarssl) > to a server running 2.0.9? Well, the default crypto algorithms are not compatible between polarssl and openssl-using openvpn. So you'd need to