Hi,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:30:39AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 3/31/2015 10:23 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:39:46AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >>I am not able to reproduce this.
> >
> >You need to use --daemon to make openvpn fork(). Otherwise, it will
> >"just
On 3/31/2015 10:30 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 3/31/2015 10:23 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:39:46AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I am not able to reproduce this.
You need to use --daemon to make openvpn fork(). Otherwise, it will
"just work", but after forking, the
On 3/31/2015 10:23 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:39:46AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I am not able to reproduce this.
You need to use --daemon to make openvpn fork(). Otherwise, it will
"just work", but after forking, the cryptodev file descriptor is no
longer valid
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:39:46AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> I am not able to reproduce this.
You need to use --daemon to make openvpn fork(). Otherwise, it will
"just work", but after forking, the cryptodev file descriptor is no
longer valid -> boom. Steffan's patch should fix that.
On 03/31/2015 11:53 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 31/03/15 10:04, Jiri Horky wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> continuing yesterday's IRC discussion. I would like to ask whether you
>> can think of a reason why TUN_MTU_MIN is set to only 100 bytes, and
>> maybe more importantly, why this value is
On 31/03/15 10:04, Jiri Horky wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> continuing yesterday's IRC discussion. I would like to ask whether you
> can think of a reason why TUN_MTU_MIN is set to only 100 bytes, and
> maybe more importantly, why this value is effectively enforced in function
>
> static void
>
On 03/31/2015 10:13 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>
> Am 31.03.15 um 10:04 schrieb Jiri Horky:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> continuing yesterday's IRC discussion. I would like to ask whether you
>> can think of a reason why TUN_MTU_MIN is set to only 100 bytes, and
>> maybe more importantly, why this value is
Am 31.03.15 um 10:04 schrieb Jiri Horky:
> Hi all,
>
> continuing yesterday's IRC discussion. I would like to ask whether you
> can think of a reason why TUN_MTU_MIN is set to only 100 bytes, and
> maybe more importantly, why this value is effectively enforced in function
>
> static void
>
Hi all,
continuing yesterday's IRC discussion. I would like to ask whether you
can think of a reason why TUN_MTU_MIN is set to only 100 bytes, and
maybe more importantly, why this value is effectively enforced in function
static void
tls_init_control_channel_frame_parameters(const struct frame
Am 31.03.2015 um 08:44 schrieb sam...@openvpn.net:
> From: Samuli Seppänen
>
> This patch is against the release/2.3 branch
>
> Trac: 512
> Signed-off-by: Samuli Seppänen
> ---
> doc/openvpn.8 | 1800
>
From: Samuli Seppänen
This patch is against the release/2.3 branch
Trac: 512
Signed-off-by: Samuli Seppänen
---
doc/openvpn.8 | 1800 -
1 file changed, 900 insertions(+), 900 deletions(-)
diff
From: Samuli Seppänen
Trac: 512
Signed-off-by: Samuli Seppänen
---
doc/openvpn.8 | 1810 -
1 file changed, 905 insertions(+), 905 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/openvpn.8 b/doc/openvpn.8
index
12 matches
Mail list logo