Hi Emmanuel,
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 05:49:48PM +0200, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
> I'll post my new patches as soon as I get over every issues
> that have been talked on the ML (is that even a valid
> sentence?)
I'm wondering where this got stuck - are you waiting for us to move
forward (like,
On 18/05/17 22:37, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 09:20:15PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> Each RPM based distro have their own set of packaging guidelines. We
>> don't adhere to any of them and we're bad at keeping this up-to-date.
>> Rather let distros take care of
Each RPM based distro have their own set of packaging guidelines. We
don't adhere to any of them and we're bad at keeping this up-to-date.
Rather let distros take care of this job.
Signed-off-by: David Sommerseth
---
distro/rpm/openvpn.spec.in| 248
ACK, thanks. Sorry that it took so long, wanted to verify things and
then it got lost. Since it's openbsd specific, I only did cursory
checks ("the code looks sane and getrtable() is documented to do what
you say"), but did not set up a system with non-0 routing tables.
Your patch has been
ACK, thanks.
For reference, this is the same patch as 14670a9d654b in master, just
adapted to the different code style in 2.3. Tested on FreeBSD 11.
Your patch has been applied to the release/2.3 branch.
commit 0b339bf9588a8bca70b74926f03f8be05f06faa6
Author: Antonio Quartulli
Date: Tue May
ACK (since it's the 2.3 patch from Guido, reformatted for 2.4/master)
Slightly modified the commit message to refer to the 2.3 patch and
to trac #890.
Your patch has been applied to the master and release/2.4 branch.
commit 3fbc9d2b1b1e75b227107057b92ce6b786b5bea1 (master)
commit
As we've had an ugly blunder with the v2.3.15 release, this release
tries to avoid making the same mistake once again. Plus it documents
how we produce the source packages.
Signed-off-by: David Sommerseth
---
dev-tools/gen-release-tarballs.sh | 248
Patch has been applied to the master and release/2.4 branch, with
the soft/hard correction pointed out by Steffan.
Thanks to everyone helping here.
commit 5634cecf71ee9a92227bc9c8414c614d1b741abb (master)
commit 13c05ca4e9da88ef30a778c16a97f0c0d767b448 (release/2.4)
Author: Gert Doering
Date:
Hi,
On 18-05-17 12:22, Gert Doering wrote:
> If a client reconnects on a soft-restart from the same port (due to --bind
> in use on the client), both sides will handle this as a "reconnect" and
> not a "full new connect" internally, re-using existing crypto context.
This is actually a "hard
Your patch has been applied to the master and release/2.4 branch.
"Changes.rst" changes adjusted - this is no longer "new in 2.4.1" :-)
commit 2193d7c08484d56ed07ba2e649abc2d08adcb245 (master)
commit 5d5437710c282b1a60a892d1910160027a81db92 (release/2.4)
Author: David Sommerseth
Date: Thu May
ACK, thanks. Tested standalone compilation before/after.
Your patch has been applied to the master and release/2.4 branch.
commit cf9deedf425c945906d5cc482fb962796d21f123 (master)
commit 37b3409681ee04b7cb7c246a7fd701a883e582e2 (release/2.4)
Author: Matthias Andree
Date: Mon May 15 23:48:45
If a client reconnects on a soft-restart from the same port (due to --bind
in use on the client), both sides will handle this as a "reconnect" and
not a "full new connect" internally, re-using existing crypto context.
The client will still ask the server for pushed options, and the server
code to
ACK, thanks. This brings 2.3 in line with 2.4/master, which is good :-)
Your patch has been applied to the release/2.3 branch.
commit c18802e2e2c5b156d1b40dab255cea273131a96c
Author: Selva Nair
Date: Sun May 14 18:16:36 2017 -0400
Check for errors in the return value of
Am 16.05.2017 um 14:00 schrieb Renato Botelho:
> On 16/05/17 08:54, Renato Botelho wrote:
>> Hello Mathias,
>>
>> I was trying to get openvpn23 installed from quarterly branch and got
>> the following error:
>>
>> root@buildbot1:/usr/local/poudriere/ports/pfSense_v2_3/security/openvpn23
>> # make
14 matches
Mail list logo