Hi,
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 10:49:42AM -0400, Selva Nair wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 9:29 AM Gert Doering wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 10:51:58AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > > Do we need to maintain C89 compatibility these days?
> > No. C99 is fully acceptable.
>
> But our c
Hi
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 9:29 AM Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 10:51:58AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > Do we need to maintain C89 compatibility these days?
>
> No. C99 is fully acceptable.
>
But our coding style still has to be followed. That means /* */ comments
Acked-by: Gert Doering
"obviously correct" :-)
Your patch has been applied to the master branch.
commit 5a5d11a0dea51e709b44dfabc1ec97b5f3c5b222 (master)
Author: Antonio Quartulli
Date: Fri Aug 27 16:56:56 2021 +0200
man/protocol-options: add missing ending metachar
Signed-off-by:
I have not tested this beyond "openvpn --show-gateway", and that one
still works :-) - also, we've discussed this on IRC before.
Your patch has been applied to the master and release/2.5 branch (bugfix).
2.4 does not contain the offending code.
commit aa0e44e235f7bee0e12707b6899d00bad85195fc (ma
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 10:51:58AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Do we need to maintain C89 compatibility these days?
No. C99 is fully acceptable.
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come
Am 27.08.21 um 21:00 schrieb Antonio Quartulli:
> OpenVPN shipped a small packet filtering tool called PF. It has never
> been straightforward as it required a plugin to work. On top of that,
> keeping PF support, makes the code more complicated and increases the
> maintenance cost of OpenVPN.
>
>
