Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC] openssl minimum supported version

2012-02-22 Thread David Sommerseth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22/02/12 17:46, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 22/02/12 17:13, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: >> Dear project managers. I need a decision regarding the minimum >> supported openssl. > > I'd say we support these libraries and tools as the oldest supported: >

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC] openssl minimum supported version

2012-02-22 Thread David Sommerseth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22/02/12 17:13, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > Dear project managers. I need a decision regarding the minimum > supported openssl. I'd say we support these libraries and tools as the oldest supported: > =autoconf-2.59 =automake-1.9 =libtool-1.5.22

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC] openssl minimum supported version

2012-02-22 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Dear project managers. I need a decision regarding the minimum supported openssl.

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC] openssl minimum supported version

2012-02-21 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:20:50PM +0200, Samuli Seppänen wrote: > Also, ecrist publishes source tarballs every couple of weeks already... > couldn't these old autotools users use those and still get failrly > recent OpenVPN versions on their boxes? Exactly. You need autotools if you want

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC] openssl minimum supported version

2012-02-21 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:56:37PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > There might be similar restrictions related to autoconf/automake tools > too. As James has some automation for the Access Server builds for those > supported platforms, we must be sure we don't break that for him. From >

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC] openssl minimum supported version

2012-02-21 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:15:22PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > OpenVPN supports minimum openssl version of 0.9.6, while this version > is unsupported by upstream and probably a security risk. > > What would be a suitable minimum version to support? > > I think that 0.9.8 is the one.

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC] openssl minimum supported version

2012-02-21 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:51 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: >> No there is none. Unlike other dependencies autotools dependencies are >> of development machine. You should create tarball on newer machine >> then compile it on the target platform. Target platform may

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC] openssl minimum supported version

2012-02-21 Thread David Sommerseth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21/02/12 17:12, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:56 PM, David Sommerseth > wrote: >> There might be similar restrictions related to autoconf/automake >> tools too. As James has some automation for

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC] openssl minimum supported version

2012-02-21 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:56 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: > There might be similar restrictions related to autoconf/automake tools > too.  As James has some automation for the Access Server builds for those > supported platforms, we must be sure we don't break that

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC] openssl minimum supported version

2012-02-21 Thread David Sommerseth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21/02/12 16:15, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > Hello, > > OpenVPN supports minimum openssl version of 0.9.6, while this version > is unsupported by upstream and probably a security risk. > > What would be a suitable minimum version to support? > > I

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC] openssl minimum supported version

2012-02-21 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alon.bar...@gmail.com> > À: "openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" <Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > Envoyé: Mardi 21 Février 2012 16:15:22 > Objet: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC] openssl minimum suppo

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC] openssl minimum supported version

2012-02-21 Thread Jan Just Keijser
Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > Hello, > > OpenVPN supports minimum openssl version of 0.9.6, while this version > is unsupported by upstream and probably a security risk. > > What would be a suitable minimum version to support? > > I think that 0.9.8 is the one. > EL5 and most SuSE distro's still use

[Openvpn-devel] [RFC] openssl minimum supported version

2012-02-21 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello, OpenVPN supports minimum openssl version of 0.9.6, while this version is unsupported by upstream and probably a security risk. What would be a suitable minimum version to support? I think that 0.9.8 is the one. Regards, Alon.