Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] TAP driver for Solaris patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30/10/10 21:15, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > back to the list after some private e-mails... > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 02:25:54PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:13:09PM +0900, Kazuyoshi Aizawa wrote: >>> I attached a

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Socks5 username/password authentication support

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/10/10 00:56, Pierre Bourdon wrote: > Hello, > > This patch adds support for SOCKS plain text (username/password) > authentication as described in RFC 1929. It adds an optional third > parameter to the socks-proxy option, which is a file

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py

Hi, On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 05:50:19PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > If I've understood it correctly, this is related to signing the Windows > TUN/TAP driver. So if you don't have a signing key/tool available, it > is still possible to build the rest of OpenVPN. You might even manage > to

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py

Samuli Seppänen wrote: > Peter: settings.in is stored in git. Ok. > I agree that there should be no way one could make an unsigned build by > mistake. I think dazo's suggestion about having a command-line switch > ("force unsigned build") is a good one. The SIGNTOOL variable could then > be

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py

> > What if build_all.py did this: > > > - Check if SIGNTOOL is enabled in settings.in: > > - Yes: fail if can't import "sign" module > > - No: don't fail if can't import "sign" module > > > I think existence of the SIGNTOOL variable gives a good clue of user's > > intentions. Note that the

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/11/10 18:11, Samuli Seppänen wrote: > >> On 12/11/10 17:55, Peter Stuge wrote: >>> David Sommerseth wrote: >> Modified win/build_all.py so that build does not fail even if >> the optional signtool python class is not available. >

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py

Samuli Seppänen wrote: > What if build_all.py did this: > > - Check if SIGNTOOL is enabled in settings.in: > - Yes: fail if can't import "sign" module > - No: don't fail if can't import "sign" module This also sounds good. (Who typically creates settings.in? Is one in git?) //Peter

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/11/10 17:55, Peter Stuge wrote: > David Sommerseth wrote: Modified win/build_all.py so that build does not fail even if the optional signtool python class is not available. >>> >>> What is it needed for? Is it really *always* optional?

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py

David Sommerseth wrote: > >> Modified win/build_all.py so that build does not fail even if > >> the optional signtool python class is not available. > > > > What is it needed for? Is it really *always* optional? > > If I've understood it correctly, this is related to signing the Windows >

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py

> Samuli Seppänen wrote: > >> From 57b983dc2a1f4a31d3b7c0e2f6de7f778d234b2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: =?utf-8?q?Samuli=20Sepp=C3=A4nen?= >> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:32:19 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py >> >>

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/11/10 17:36, Peter Stuge wrote: > Samuli Seppänen wrote: >> From 57b983dc2a1f4a31d3b7c0e2f6de7f778d234b2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: =?utf-8?q?Samuli=20Sepp=C3=A4nen?= >> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:32:19 +0200 >>

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py

Samuli Seppänen wrote: > From 57b983dc2a1f4a31d3b7c0e2f6de7f778d234b2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?utf-8?q?Samuli=20Sepp=C3=A4nen?= > Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:32:19 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py > > Modified

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Removed hardcoded sign module dependency from win/build_all.py

Second version of the patch. As suggested by dazo I added printing of an informational message if the sign module is not found. Also fixed a few typos (signtool -> sign). From a6321a47b0d4341700ad226a8b6c9abcba2052a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf-8?q?Samuli=20Sepp=C3=A4nen?=

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Added check for variable CONFIGURE_DEFINES into options.c

Samuli Seppänen wrote: > >From 327d6c66fff6962a96f86110dc91b1dad07ca224 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?utf-8?q?Samuli=20Sepp=C3=A4nen?= > Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:30:07 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Added check for variable CONFIGURE_DEFINES into options.c > > The file

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py

From 57b983dc2a1f4a31d3b7c0e2f6de7f778d234b2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf-8?q?Samuli=20Sepp=C3=A4nen?= Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:32:19 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py Modified win/build_all.py so that build does not

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Added check for variable CONFIGURE_DEFINES into options.c

>From 327d6c66fff6962a96f86110dc91b1dad07ca224 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf-8?q?Samuli=20Sepp=C3=A4nen?= List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:30:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Added check for variable CONFIGURE_DEFINES into options.c

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Architecture diagram & Theory of Operation documents

> Jan Just Keijser wrote: > >> PS I am not directly involved in the development of openvpn :) >> > > Actually I think you are! Because you have at the very least > contributed information about bugs that you have encountered, > which might not have been discovered otherwise. > > Writing

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Architecture diagram & Theory of Operation documents

Hi, On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:18:26AM +0100, Jan Just Keijser wrote: > PS I am not directly involved in the development of openvpn :) Please do get involved more :-) - you seem to have a knack for finding sore spots, we need that. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!