Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Gargoyle -- another (new) web interface for OpenWrt Kamikaze

2008-07-16 Thread OutBackDingo
Its funny you all speak about division, being i cant completely functionally use any of them that exists, being x-wrt, gargoyle, or luci so to each there own, there is CoovaAP also which is a diversion gargoyle doesnt even configure WDS from where i can see, looking at Luci next, x-wrt leaves a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Gargoyle -- another (new) web interface for OpenWrt Kamikaze

2008-07-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 20:59 +0700, OutBackDingo wrote: Its funny you all speak about division, being i cant completely functionally use any of them that exists, being x-wrt, gargoyle, or luci That's exactly my point. _Exactly_. Here we have 3 or 4 (or more) web UIs all going off in different

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Gargoyle -- another (new) web interface for OpenWrt Kamikaze

2008-07-16 Thread OutBackDingo
I think you might be reading between the lines here, clarifying my thoughts, diversification is good, controlled collaboration growing from that is even better overall I think its best you take a good look at the BSD arena, there are multiple BSDs all living and playing well, and sharing

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Gargoyle -- another (new) web interface for OpenWrt Kamikaze

2008-07-15 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 17:04 -0400, Eric Bishop wrote: It is ironic that the LuCI team decided to make an announcement regarding their project today. I have also been working on a new (open source) web interface for Kamikaze called Gargoyle, and am now releasing the first beta version, which

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Gargoyle -- another (new) web interface for OpenWrt Kamikaze

2008-07-15 Thread Eric Bishop
Brian J. Murrell wrote: On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 17:04 -0400, Eric Bishop wrote: It is ironic that the LuCI team decided to make an announcement regarding their project today. I have also been working on a new (open source) web interface for Kamikaze called Gargoyle, and am now releasing the