I upgraded to 1.1.7-alfa yesterday and saw that it is really a crap :(
I used to manage my cookies, javacsript and history, MYSELF. Now trobutton
wants to do all by itself, and the result is that:
1- My history isn't cleared when I close Firefox, even when this option is
selected in the
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I upgraded to 1.1.7-alfa yesterday and saw that it is really a crap :(
maybe you didn't realize that this is release is _alpha_ quality?
I used to manage my cookies, javacsript and history, MYSELF. Now trobutton
wants to do all by itself,
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 06:47:17 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I upgraded to 1.1.7-alfa yesterday and saw that it is really a crap :(
I used to manage my cookies, javacsript and history, MYSELF. Now trobutton
wants to do all by itself, and the result is that:
1- My history isn't cleared when
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:10:28 +0200 Florian Reitmeir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I upgraded to 1.1.7-alfa yesterday and saw that it is really a crap :(
maybe you didn't realize that this is release is _alpha_ quality?
I used to manage my cookies,
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:47:17AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.8K bytes in
9 lines about:
: I used to manage my cookies, javacsript and history, MYSELF. Now trobutton
wants to do all by itself, and the result is that:
: 1- My history isn't cleared when I close Firefox, even when this option
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:38:14PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.8K bytes in
53 lines about:
I'm trying to find the details, but essentially the named flag isn't
as valuable as it was in the past. Perhaps Roger or Nick can weigh in
with more info.
We do receive all of the emails to tor-ops
Juliusz Chroboczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this results in a perceptible performance improvement for general
browsing.
I think so too, but some people disagree. Since I don't want to get
into this discussion again, I refer you to the following friendly flamewar.
Additionally
Most servers treat Last-Modified values as opaque validators --
IIS and Apache -- don't.
Interesting -- thanks for the info.
Juliusz
Hello,
I must add that I have also tried to register kgabertgoldmine2 *twice*
since around the end of June, 2007, and seeing that it has not
happened I assumed that servers which are trying to be named are not
even being looked at. When I registered kgabertgoldmine (which is now
offline, and I
Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I upgraded to 1.1.7-alfa yesterday and saw that it is really a crap
:(
Thanks for the bug report. Even though it is a bit immaturely
delivered with lots of whining instead of actual helpful content, I
will do my best to fix the issues you have
Thus spake Scott Bennett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 06:47:17 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I upgraded to 1.1.7-alfa yesterday and saw that it is really a crap :(
I used to manage my cookies, javacsript and history, MYSELF. Now trobutton
wants to do all by itself, and
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 03:06:53AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
Does anyone have a sense of the current processing delay in registering
a server? I ask only because I sent off the registration information to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] last Thursday evening, 13 Sept., and my server is still
showing
Hi Folks,
I just wanted to let you know, that I have set up a Webproxy to the
TOR-Network, for letting people get the advantages of TOR who are not
able to install TOR for themselves.
For example, if they are using a computer, they do not have full access
to, or something else.
It is running on
Ricky Fitz schrieb:
Hi Folks,
I just wanted to let you know, that I have set up a Webproxy to the
TOR-Network, for letting people get the advantages of TOR who are not
able to install TOR for themselves.
[...]
Let me know what you think about!
Greetings,
Ricky.
First: Another
Hi Bluestar,
First: Another single-point-of-trust service. Principally a bad idea,
because *you* know all the sites the users are surfing to! Why should I
(as user) trust you?
Of course, that is true, and I mention it in the FAQ. But you can ask
every anonymizer on the web the same question.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:42:31AM +0200, Ricky Fitz wrote:
It is running on the same server my TOR-Server is running (called
GrossATuin).
Does your proxy use a separate Tor client, do you exclude your node as
as an entry?
I was wondering recently about the security implications of such a
Am Sonntag, den 23.09.2007, 20:50 -0400 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:42:31AM +0200, Ricky Fitz wrote:
It is running on the same server my TOR-Server is running (called
GrossATuin).
Does your proxy use a separate Tor client, do you exclude your node as
as an entry?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:42:31AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.9K bytes in
40 lines about:
: I just wanted to let you know, that I have set up a Webproxy to the
: TOR-Network, for letting people get the advantages of TOR who are not
: able to install TOR for themselves.
Hi,
I have a few
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:22:34AM +0200, Ricky Fitz wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 23.09.2007, 20:50 -0400 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:42:31AM +0200, Ricky Fitz wrote:
It is running on the same server my TOR-Server is running (called
GrossATuin).
Does your proxy
19 matches
Mail list logo
