If you are using Tor (and have Firefox configured to use the HTTP
proxy), Firefox will not use the proxy for IPv6 traffic.
Nonsense. At the time at which Firefox decides whether to make
a request through a proxy, it doesn't yet know whether the target
server has an IPv6 address.
What you're
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 12:37:33AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.8K bytes in
28 lines about:
: We also modified the default Privoxy config files in the bundles to
: avoid some security problems, so make sure to leave install Privoxy
: checked when you upgrade.
: could you be more verbose
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 12:37:33AM +0200, Marco Bonetti wrote:
Roger Dingledine wrote:
We also modified the default Privoxy config files in the bundles to
avoid some security problems, so make sure to leave install Privoxy
checked when you upgrade.
could you be more verbose about privoxy
Roger Dingledine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This ninth development snapshot switches clients to the new v3 directory
system; allows servers to be listed in the network status even when they
have the same nickname as a registered server; and fixes many other bugs
including a big one that was
Thanks for the clarification. It's much easier to understand now.
Comrade Ringo Kamens
On 10/26/07, Nick 'Zaf' Clifford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick 'Zaf' Clifford wrote:
Hey ya,
Just noticed one small problem with Tor + Firefox + IPv6.
I'm aware that Tor doesn't yet support IPv6, but I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. We set the following variables to 0:
thanks!
- --
Marco Bonetti
Slackintosh Linux Project Developer: http://www.slackintosh.org
Linux-live for powerpc: http://www.slackintosh.org/pub/rsync/mb/linux-live
My webstuff:
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger Dingledine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This ninth development snapshot switches clients to the new v3 directory
system; allows servers to be listed in the network status even when they
have the same nickname as a registered server; and fixes many
It might help to make links to certain sites in this list topic so
that google will index them. For instance:
awxcnx dotde/tor-i2p-proxy-en.htm?JASDJHSDF.ONION
That way, google gets to them and can do all of the hard indexing leg
work. The wikis would be a good place to link to.
Comrade Ringo
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 08:12:58PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
Oct 27 18:32:00.180 [err] Bug: container.c:828: strmap_get: Assertion map
failed; aborting.
Not using MyFamily works around the problem
(and in my case it's not necessary anyway).
Maybe specifying the MyFamily nodes by
Ringo Kamens schrieb:
It might help to make links to certain sites in this list topic so
that google will index them. For instance:
awxcnx dotde/tor-i2p-proxy-en.htm?JASDJHSDF.ONION
Nice idea, we have done the job and hope, google will like our links.
That way, google gets to them and can do
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 05:46:33PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 08:12:58PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
Oct 27 18:32:00.180 [err] Bug: container.c:828: strmap_get: Assertion map
failed; aborting.
Not using MyFamily works around the problem
(and in my case it's
11 matches
Mail list logo
