Scott Bennett wrote:
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:08:26 -0800 F. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Chad Z. Hower aka Kudzu wrote:
(snip)
Does TOR implement QOS or prioritization? That is only use bandwidth when
other traffic is not present?
This can be done further upstream of the
Relatively new to Tor.
Been using Tor a few weeks.
Installed it on a Ubuntu system (192.168.6.9) using Synaptic.
From Firefox on Windows, I just specify the ip address
192.168.6.9 and port 8118 for the http proxy.
It works. It gets slow now and then but that is just fine.
I have another custom
Quoth _ [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 2008-02-03 03:20:54 -0800:
Is it possible to make UDP go over Tor?
The short answer is no.
https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#head-ebe87162a46f267eb697e23fb77e85e4cf643dd0
--- Drake Wilson
Hi,
I would like to run an exit-node and I'm looking for a server for about
30€/month. And important: it shouldn't be located in germany because I have no
money to spend for trouble with the feds.. Can someone tell me a provider who
fits these requirements?
cheers
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:29:48 +0100
Marco Gruß [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ovh.de/produkte/isgenug.xml
Not sure though if France is any better than Germany really...
Marco
This link points to a german company not a french one :)
greets
kazaam schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:29:48 +0100
Marco Gruß [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ovh.de/produkte/isgenug.xml
Not sure though if France is any better than Germany really...
Marco
This link points to a german company not a french one :)
greets
Quote: OVH ist in
Hi,
kazaam wrote:
I would like to run an exit-node and I'm looking for a server for
about 30€/month. And important: it shouldn't be located in germany
because I have no money to spend for trouble with the feds..
http://www.ovh.de/produkte/isgenug.xml
Not sure though if France is any better
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:24:24 +0100
Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it don't think it matters much, where your server is as long as your
address still is in Germany, or am I mistaken?
Well I think/guess/believe/hope ;) if the police realizes that the IP-address
has its origin in foreign
kazaam schrieb:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:24:24 +0100
Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it don't think it matters much, where your server is as long as your
address still is in Germany, or am I mistaken?
Well I think/guess/believe/hope ;) if the police realizes that the IP-address
Hi Kaazam,
Marco Gruß schrieb:
http://www.ovh.de/produkte/isgenug.xml
Not sure though if France is any better than Germany really...
This server has only 256MB RAM. It seems very less for a tor server.
My tor servers take 400 - 450MB RAM. May be, you need at least this one:
Andrew wrote:
Is there anyone who could give a (somewhat professional) assessment of
how a web-of-trust feature would impact on anonymity? How about tor's
overall performance?
George Danezis has looked at using sparse expander graphs for mix
networks [1]: each node has a small number of
Karsten N. wrote:
http://www.ovh.de/produkte/isgenug.xml
This server has only 256MB RAM. It seems very less for a tor server.
That's true, but traffic is unlimited! :)
My tor servers take 400 - 450MB RAM.
Since I restart Tor on my server (Gypsy2) every midnight, it works fine
with a
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 02:36:10AM -0500, Silivrenion wrote:
I did notice torbrowser was in the directory format that is friendly with
PortableApps format applications, so props on that.
Interesting take, taking what Portable Tor http://portabletor.sf.net has
done and bringing it to an all
binhi5bdoholU.bin
Description: PGP/MIME version identification
encrypted.asc
Description: OpenPGP encrypted message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Olaf Selke wrote:
(an encrypted message)
Mmmm... strong crypto. --Bruce Schneier
:: giggles ::
- --
F. Fox
AAS, CompTIA A+/Network+/Security+
Owner of Tor node kitsune
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
oops, my mail has been encrypted
Gitano wrote:
Karsten N. wrote:
http://www.ovh.de/produkte/isgenug.xml
This server has only 256MB RAM. It seems very less for a tor server.
That's true, but traffic is unlimited! :)
100 Mbit/s SLA mit 1000 GB Traffic (anschliessend 5 Mbit/s, sobald der
Olaf Selke schrieb:
btw: recently I moved my tor exit node into another network which is
assigned directly to me according RIPE DB. From public perception I'm
my own ISP now:
http://ripe.net/fcgi-bin/whois?form_type=simplefull_query_string=searchtext=192.251.226.205
My ISP was sick from
Florian D. wrote:
Olaf Selke wrote:
100 Mbit/s SLA mit 1000 GB Traffic (anschliessend 5 Mbit/s, sobald der
Grenzwert überschritten wurde)
means 1 TB (each month?) is included. Afterwards the server will be
throttled to 5 MBit/s bandwidth.
read closer:
ODER
100 Mbit/s ohne SLA mit
Olaf Selke schrieb:
cutting off power supply after the first TB traffic is transferred
would comply with this offer. Do you really expect them to permit
100MBit/s unlimited traffic each month for a few bucks?
Didn't I read something about a 99.9% uptime guarantee on their site?
Actually, the
Olaf Selke wrote:
100 Mbit/s SLA mit 1000 GB Traffic (anschliessend 5 Mbit/s, sobald der
Grenzwert überschritten wurde)
means 1 TB (each month?) is included. Afterwards the server will be
throttled to 5 MBit/s bandwidth.
Olaf
read closer:
ODER
100 Mbit/s ohne SLA mit unbegrenztem
Olaf Selke wrote:
http://www.ovh.de/produkte/isgenug.xml
This server has only 256MB RAM. It seems very less for a tor server.
That's true, but traffic is unlimited! :)
100 Mbit/s SLA mit 1000 GB Traffic (anschliessend 5 Mbit/s, sobald der
Grenzwert überschritten wurde)
ODER 100 Mbit/s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Olaf Selke wrote:
(snip)
More expensive than IP traffic will be ISP's personnel expenses for a
tor exit gw's abuse handling.
(snip)
And if you're your own ISP - as you mentioned with the RIPE trick -
you'd better have a lot of money, and some
F. Fox wrote:
Olaf Selke wrote:
(an encrypted message)
Mmmm... strong crypto. --Bruce Schneier
:: giggles ::
shit, I must stop smoking this stuff! Have been confused by
Thunderbird's spellchecker suggestion to replace Gitano with
Antitank :-)
btw: recently I moved my tor exit node into
Andrew wrote:
Didn't I read something about a 99.9% uptime guarantee on their site?
Actually, the German Strato AG also has switched their dedicated
servers, starting at EUR 70 a month, to an unlimited traffic plan. No
fair-use or similar downsides.
I'd just like to know what the bandwidth
Steven, i suggest to make it hardcoded default and a Must, that each user,
using this browser, is as well running an tor **exit** node,
tit for tat. like emule partials: upload is a MUST.
That would help a lot to have more tor-exit nodes.
Thanks.
On Jan 30, 2008 1:52 AM, Steven J. Murdoch
[EMAIL
Version 1.1.13 of the development series of the Torbutton Firefox
Extension has been released at https://torbutton.torproject.org/dev/
This release features a couple of important security fixes to work
around two Firefox bugs. Firefox bug 409737 allows pages to still
execute some javascript after
Steven, i suggest to make it hardcoded default and a Must, that each user,
using this browser, is as well running an tor **exit** node,
And what about countries where something like Tor is illegal?
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 22:19:54 +0100 Michael Schmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] top-posted:
Steven, i suggest to make it hardcoded default and a Must, that each user,
using this browser, is as well running an tor **exit** node,
tit for tat. like emule partials: upload is a MUST.
That would help a lot to
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 16:47:24 -0800 Michael_google gmail_Gersten
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steven, i suggest to make it hardcoded default and a Must, that each user,
using this browser, is as well running an tor **exit** node,
And what about countries where something like Tor is illegal?
Yes,
The problem of corrupted exit servers is indeed one that we should all
ponder until a solution may be found.
We have entry guards, with the purpose of reducing the chance of
someone who has control of multiple nodes from tying your entry and
exit information together.
Why not have exit
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:19:54PM +0100, Michael Schmidt wrote:
Steven, i suggest to make it hardcoded default and a Must, that each user,
using this browser, is as well running an tor **exit** node,
tit for tat. like emule partials: upload is a MUST.
I don't think this is likely in the near
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I have to disagree with setting any options by default like that. The
concept behind PortableTor as I wrote it was to let the end user have the
right to decide what to do.. don't force anything on them! I think this
concept should be relevant to all
32 matches
Mail list logo
