On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 23:34:00 -0400 Roger Dingledine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 08:20:47AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
A short time ago, I found that 212.205.53.212 had several hundred open
TCP connections to my tor server's DirPort, and very little relay traffic
Link bounced from /.: http://labs.mozilla.com/2008/10/introducing-geode/
Looks like the upcoming versions of firefox will ship the support for W3C
geolocation specification: what's better for a tor attacker to ask
directly to the browser where its user lives? ;-)
I'm quite confident there'll be a
Scott Bennett wrote:
Well, technically speaking, I guess that's true. However, unless I'm
greatly mistaken, the exit end of a circuit will compress any data coming into
it to be relayed back to the client and will uncompress anything arriving from
the client to be sent out from the
* on the Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 01:11:37PM +0200, Tom Hek wrote:
It's really scary when a random website can request your physical
location imo.. I really hope you can disable that shit in the new
version of Firefox when they include it..
Rather than adding to the speculation, I thought I'd
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:51:54 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 07:52:10AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.8K bytes
in 18 lines about:
: Rather than adding to the speculation, I thought I'd actually test the
plugin.
: Whenever a site requests your location, your browser
It's really scary when a random website can request your physical
location imo.. I really hope you can disable that shit in the new
version of Firefox when they include it..
Tom
Marco Bonetti wrote:
Link bounced from /.: http://labs.mozilla.com/2008/10/introducing-geode/
Looks like the
unsubscribe me.
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:50:28 -0700 F. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
M wrote:
Thanx Gregory and F.Fox...understood the concept. Just one note though:
Tor (like all current practical low-latency anonymity designs) fails
when the attacker can see both ends of the communications channel.
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 04:32:16 -0700 (PDT) J B [EMAIL PROTECTED]
top-posted:
thanks to you guys who helped me unsubscribe.
however, note that actually my (yahoo) address has full headers and I dont see
any way to unsubscribe, apart from how you guys said to do it.
I checked the headers and
thanks to you guys who helped me unsubscribe.
however, note that actually my (yahoo) address has full headers and I dont see
any way to unsubscribe, apart from how you guys said to do it.
I checked the headers and there is nothing about it, even under word search.
I think these headers only
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 07:52:10AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.8K bytes in
18 lines about:
: Rather than adding to the speculation, I thought I'd actually test the plugin.
: Whenever a site requests your location, your browser asks permission to send
it,
: and also allows you to specify how
Hi John,
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 04:15:35AM -0700, John Mosgrove wrote:
unsubscribe me.
Please write your Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with mailbody including:
unsubscribe or-talk
btw:
When finally will list-subscribers check their mailheaders for this?
sigi.
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 14:22:32 Matthew McCabe wrote:
Hey-
Last night, Time Warner Cable temporarily disabled my account due to an
alleged attack coming from my IP address and targeting a server in
Europe (Denmark I believe). Below is the e-mail I sent them to respond
to the
It would never have occurred to me to check the headers either, so
perhaps you are being too hard on them.
GD
On 9 Oct 2008, at 13:24, sigi wrote:
Hi John,
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 04:15:35AM -0700, John Mosgrove wrote:
unsubscribe me.
Please write your Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
BTW, Hotmail users with Macs can't reliably access email headers at
all, and yes that is stupid of Hotmail but they don't care.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Geoff Down [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 9 October 2008 19:08:35 BST
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Re: unsubscribe
Reply-To:
On Oct 8, 2008, at 11:41 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
Consider: Nothing prevents you from running multiple tor nodes. A well
funded party might run dozens or hundreds.
Maybe one day somebody will actually try to analyze this.
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 07:08:35PM +0100, Geoff Down wrote:
On 9 Oct 2008, at 13:24, sigi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 04:15:35AM -0700, John Mosgrove wrote:
unsubscribe me.
Please write your Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with mailbody including:
unsubscribe or-talk
btw:
When finally will
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:23:48 +0100 Geoff Down [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 9 Oct 2008, at 13:33, Scott Bennett wrote:
While we're on this subject, I'd like to point out a problem with
tor's
current data rate capacity testing during server initialization. In
order
to get some
18 matches
Mail list logo
