Last week I found a voice mail message from a phone number I didn't
recognize, who claimed to be from the Comcast Security Assurance Division,
demanding that I call them at yet another number I didn't recognize. I called
the normal number to reach Comcast, explained what had happened, and
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 04:12:34AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
The only suggestion from any of the Comcast employees on how I might get
around a 250 GB/mo. limit was that switching to Comcast Business-class service
might do it, but they didn't know for sure because they only dealt with
Hi folks,
I just wrote up a blog post about the document we finished yesterday,
which describes our understanding of why the Tor network is slow, and
what measures we can take to resolve the issues:
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/why-tor-is-slow
And for those who had no idea we've got a blog,
Scott-
Sorry to hear that you are also having problems with your ISP. I ended
up dropping Time Warner and signing up for Earthlink - which actually
uses the same TWC network. So now I am back on TWC and must watch my
p's and q's or I will be kicked off. I even have the same TWC account
Oh, don't be deluded into thinking they give a rats-ass about
Business Customers either - I used to have a business account from
TWC because I telecommuted and needed multiple static IPs and no
restrictions on the linein the early days they were responsive to
problems/issues, but near
Hi Scott,
dont forget, that your's ISP last mile connectity is not sized for running
high-traffic servers. They count with aggregation, because dont expect many
users running any kind of server application. And I think there is nothing
illegal in their business. If you want to run fast server,
I incorrectly posted the following to your blog.
Please ignore the blog post.
*
*
*Greetings:*
*I gather when running as a relay server, there is a publicly exposed
listener.
Is it vulnerable to a buffer exploit?
if so, what kind of protective firewalling does it need in order for the
server
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:22:49AM +0100, eu...@leitl.org wrote 1.0K bytes in
19 lines about:
: There's not much point running Tor on capped residential broadband.
: Rent a server with a decent traffic plan and throttle your Tor so
: you're within limits.
Actually, there is value to running a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
kitsune runs on residential broadband, and handles plenty of traffic
within its bandwidth class. It's good to see the server's link light
blinking. =:oD
- --
F. Fox
Owner of Tor node kitsune
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-BEGIN PGP
9 matches
Mail list logo
