Re: Debian/Ubuntu tor users, please check for core files

2010-11-25 Thread Jan Weiher
Hi, no core files on my Ubuntu 8.04 relay. regards, Jan Am 25.11.2010 04:29, schrieb Walt Mankowski: On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:17:41PM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote: Hi folks, If you use our debs on Debian or Ubuntu, can you please do ls -la /var/lib/tor/core* as root, and let us know

Re: Debian/Ubuntu tor users, please check for core files

2010-11-25 Thread Jim McClanahan
Jan Weiher wrote: Hi, no core files on my Ubuntu 8.04 relay. regards, Jan Has anybody checked to see whether the Tor instances running on Ubuntu have the ability to leave core files? I've never delved into the details, but I know on older versions of Ubuntu, running ulimit in a shell

Re: Active Attacks - Already in Progress?

2010-11-25 Thread Olaf Selke
On 25.11.2010 08:17, Damian Johnson wrote: The reason the operators of the largest tor relays (Blutmagie, TorServers, and Amunet) operate multiple instance is because this is the best way in practice for utilizing large connections. yep, all four blutmagie nodes are running on a single quad

Re: StrictNodes or StrictExitNodes?

2010-11-25 Thread Anon Mus
Matthew wrote: I think I am correct to say that StrictExitNodes has been negated in favour of StrictNodes. However, when I use StrictExitNodes 1 I have no problems. When I use StrictNodes 1 and have viable ExitNodes then Vidalia gives the error: Vidalia detected that the Tor software exited

Re: StrictNodes or StrictExitNodes?

2010-11-25 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:52:36PM +, Anon Mus wrote: Matthew wrote: I think I am correct to say that StrictExitNodes has been negated in favour of StrictNodes. However, when I use StrictExitNodes 1 I have no problems. When I use StrictNodes 1 and have viable ExitNodes then Vidalia

Re: Active Attacks - Already in Progress?

2010-11-25 Thread Olaf Selke
Am 25.11.2010 03:38, schrieb Theodore Bagwell: ** I speak primarily of torserversNet_ numbers 1-5, and PPrivCom___ numbers 004-052. hi there, would you mind to broaden your research covering blutmagie1-4? Its last 24h sustained bandwidth is higher than the cumulated bandwidth of all

Come here! When you want to go shopping,Very cheap

2010-11-25 Thread Arrakis Tor
pfont face=TahomaHello/font/p pfont face=TahomaA good web for you :a href=http://www.bestchoosing.info;*amp;www.bestchoosing.info%amp;/a .Hope you will like it./font/p pfont face=TahomaMAC,Tiffany,Nike,Adidas,benefit,GUCCI,Juicy,Chanel etc/font/p pfont

Re: Active Attacks - Already in Progress?

2010-11-25 Thread Olaf Selke
Hi, would it be noticed if an adversary modifies Tor's source code in order to report a fake observed bandwidth (a few KB), fake uptime data, and Windows as OS to the directories? Probably nobody will notice even if those relays carry a significant amount of traffic. Olaf

Tor 0.2.2.19-alpha is out

2010-11-25 Thread Roger Dingledine
Yet another OpenSSL security patch broke its compatibility with Tor: Tor 0.2.2.19-alpha makes relays work with OpenSSL 0.9.8p and 1.0.0.b. https://www.torproject.org/download/download Changes in version 0.2.2.19-alpha - 2010-11-21 o Major bugfixes: - Resolve an incompatibility with openssl