Just in case you wondered whether Tor and Gmail are a good
combination: They are not.
I did some testing with Privoxy's cvs version and this filter:
FILTER: googlemail Hides sponsored links with css and shows why insecure mail
transfer is a bad idea.
s@/head@style type=text/css\#fbc, \#fbl,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] top posted (please don't):
Just in case you wondered whether Tor and Gmail are a good
combination: They are not.
I did some testing with Privoxy's cvs version and this filter:
Results:
Matej Kovacic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would just like to let you know that Slovenian government (Slovenia is
a member of European Union since last year) a week ago decided to block
two on-line gambling sites, because they do not have a licence to
operate in Slovenia.
There are
gabrix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to be honest : i hate privoxy and his content filtering. i have
commented user.action file and default-action but navigation stops
anyway very often .I'm an adult person so babes or porno are allright
for me .
What does navigation stops anyway mean
Arrakistor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like some clarification regarding the Clientonly setting.
Does this explicitly mean you do not participate in any circuits, or
that you are not running as an entrance/exit node but may still run
mitm.
Perhaps it means what the man page says it
sigi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
possibly we get a problem, because in Germany they're just confiscating
tor-middleman-nodes?!?
Middleman? Plural?
The message is only available in German...
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-496214.html
This is about one single hard disk being
Anothony Georgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I never compiled Tor on Windows, but there is a fair
chance that you have to run ./configure by hand.
I tried ./configure but it gave me the not
recognized... error.
Probably your setup
Jay Goodman Tamboli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006.08.30, at 11:12, xvidivx wrote:
I have heard someone said, It will lead to account hold?
If I understand your question correctly, you are asking if PayPal
will put my account old hold if I sign in via Tor. So far I have not
seen
Mike Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus spake Arrakistor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Tell me more about the corrupt downloads, are they recent? From
karotte or sectoor?
Weirdest shit in the world. Privoxy is dumping temporary failure
messages mid-stream into the binaries, yet keeping the
Tor Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, what I would LIKE to be able to do is have more control over the
bandwidth my node requires, specifically, I want to donate a smaller
quantity of bandwidth... a steady load of 32kbps with occasional bursting to
48kbps wouldn't be a problem and it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I don't see the problem here. The option is called AllowInvalidNodes
not DoNotOnlyUseTrusworthyNodes.
You can't assume that every node not marked as invalid is trustworthy.
I notice you snipped away quite a lot of what I
maillist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really hate it when Tor servers are chained with squid
and provide modified content without letting me know.
Some of them even provide default addresses for failed
DNS requests, instead of delivering a decent error message.
I think most of these
Steven Colbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this the most appropriate list to ask a question about installing
Tor on Debian? I have a weird error after installing and wasn't sure
if I should post it here or on a Debian list.
If you get the error after the installation is already finished,
Steven Colbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a machine called twiki - it's running on a machine on my LAN:
When I have Tor and Privoxy enabled, and I try to browse it via
FireFox I get:
No such domain
Your request for *http://twiki/* could not be fulfilled, because
the
Roger Dingledine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 09:39:05PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
I read on
http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#ExitEavesdroppers:
|Tor does provide a partial solution in a very specific situation, though.
|When you make
I read on
http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#ExitEavesdroppers:
|Tor does provide a partial solution in a very specific situation, though.
|When you make a connection to a destination that also runs a Tor server,
|Tor will automatically extend your circuit so you exit from
Simon Callow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The guys at NPP say that if you click on a link in
your browser to download a html page then Tor works
fine but if you click on a link to download a pdf then
you get local DNS resolution without any warning
message from Tor even when using Privoxy.
It
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does that mean one theoretically had to deinstall
Flash before surfing with Tor?
Not to install Flash in the first place would be
an even better idea.
The same question applies to Windows Media Player on
the Mac, this is not secure to surf
with, is it? Is a
Ringo Kamens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if anybody has a solution to the problem I currently
have. Is it possible to stop tor from connecting to servers in the US
or servers on my blacklist? I have peerguardian, but that only
prevents it from connecting to honeypots etc. on the
Steve Crook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 04:35:49AM -0700, Ringo Kamens wrote:
You should have a firewall set up that only lets firefox/privoxy
connect to 127.0.0.1, that way you can be sure it isn't leaking
anything.
You could extend this philosophy to say nothing
Anothony Georgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is wise to note that Privoxy can not filter
HTTPS. Most non-tech end-users do not know this. I
do not block HTTPS connections as I think it is
easiser to simply not visit an HTTPS url.
How do you convince your browser not to fetch
Anthony DiPierro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/21/06, Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anothony Georgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is wise to note that Privoxy can not filter
HTTPS. Most non-tech end-users do not know this. I
do not block HTTPS connections as I think
Watson Ladd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we created a P2P client using Tor that acted as an exit node we
could get a lot more users, a lot more traffic, and a lot more
capacity, all adding to the anonymity Tor provides. Any downsides?
While it could motivate some people to run Tor on
101 - 123 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
