flagging for
the reasons you posted, as well as a few posted by others, including myself.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
. Horrifying
might be a more appropriate word.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
?
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
**
* A well regulated and disciplined militia
no longer set an exit policy that
they found acceptable in their circumstances?
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
for this site, or for HTTPS connections, or for 'same-origin' requests.
More information is available with DEBUG=True.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
The Republicants are back to pushing data retention legislation. :-(
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20029393-281.html#ixzz1C6p2U2fR
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 04:28:17 + (UTC) John Case c...@sdf.lonestar.org
wrote:
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Scott Bennett wrote:
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
What do those two acronyms (ASMELG, CFIAG) mean ?
They're a summary of my pilot credentials
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:03:24 -0500 David Carlson carlson...@sbcglobal.net
wrote:
On 11/6/2010 1:02 PM, Scott Bennett wrote:
I wrote:
http://news.antiwar.com/2010/11/05/us-censors-muslim-websites-list-of-=
british-mps-who-supported-iraq-war/
Using exit chuckthecanuck gives
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 14:17:20 + Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net
wrote:
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 08:05 -0600, Jon torance...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
I wrote:
http://news.antiwar.com/2010/11/05/us-censors-muslim-websites
that is probably related to U.S.
censorship.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
hijacking that is probably related to U.S.
censorship.
I changed my mind. I'm adding {ca},{uk},{us} to my ExcludeExitNodes
list with an appropriate comment for later removal in case the U.S. ever
calls off its War on the Internet. :-(
Scott Bennett, Comm
pages to get a better understanding of the extensive list of pretty awful
leakages and attacks that NoScript can block.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
reassurance.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
**
* A well
is a security violation that is only intended for
debugging a problem, not for normal use. Read the documentation
about it.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/fbi-backdoor-access-mail-texts/story?id=11825039
(Beware of linewrap in the URL.)
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
from torrc. Controllers should have the ability to
trigger rereading of torrc, but not to make this sort of major operational
change on the fly directly rather than by through rereading torrc.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
. Thank you.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
**
* A well
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:39:44 -0400 Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 01:36:18AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
I had planned to upgrade my node from 0.2.2.14-alpha this evening to
0.2.2.15-alpha, but there is an unfortunate and apparently gratuitous, new
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:05:09 +0200 Sebastian Hahn m...@sebastianhahn.net
wrote:
On Sep 10, 2010, at 9:57 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:39:44 -0400 Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu
wrote:
As I understand it, we changed no behavior except printing out a warn
for people
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:40:02 -0400 Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 03:27:01AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
Yup, that's the actual behaviour. Good thing we added the warn,
otherwise
it might have gone unnoticed longer.
Wow. This is a scandalously bad
anonymity, no get
out clause.
Nice story, bro.
Relax, Jake. He/she did write attempts, which, of course, neither
equates to nor implies successes. ;-)
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
. There
is, AFAIK, only one parameter that does what you asked for, and that one is
MaxCircuitDirtiness. That is also clear from the man page.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett
that HTTPS-Everywhere can protect your
anonymity or your privacy. If you and/or the OP continue to refuse to
use NoScript, then sooner or later you and/or the OP will get burned and
will thus be taught the hard way the lesson you should have understood by
now.
Scott
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 01:18:36 -0700 Seth David Schoen sch...@eff.org
wrote:
Scott Bennett writes:
While HTTPS-Everywhere may be a nice programming exercise for its
author(s), it appears wholly unnecessary for Firefox users because Firefox
users should *ALREADY* be using NoScript
together.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
**
* A well
is - Disable on this page only
allows http traffic only for that page?
AFAIK, NoScript doesn't discriminate among individual pages, only
by host+domainname. It does allow the use of wildcards in the names.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
) it.
What a strange thing to say! How can you credibly claim to know the
availability requirements for other persons' hidden services?
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 02:42:09 + Orionjur Tor-admin
tor-ad...@orionjurinform.com wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
There are three nodes currently listed in the directory by the names of
DerAufbruch, DerAufbruch1, and DerAufbruch2 without contact information that
are not configured
,$72EABEEEA8290EE39A44A3E06676071B98D17EBD
(Beware of linewrap in the NodeFamily line above.)
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
authorities ought to have a way of enforcing Family groupings
in a manner similar to the BadExit flag or the Invalid flag. Any thoughts
on this from others, including developers?
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
use Firefox, so just tell it what
to do.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
On Fri, 28 May 2010 12:55:19 -0700 Seth David Schoen sch...@eff.org
wrote:
Scott Bennett writes:
What seems to be missing from this discussion is the fact that NoScript
already supports forcing HTTPS on a site-by-site or pattern basis. You
should be using NoScript already if you use
On Thu, 27 May 2010 12:49:26 -0600 Jim jimmy...@copper.net wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010 09:40:29 -0400 Aplin, Justin M jmap...@ufl.edu
wrote:
I don't know about gwget, but plain wget supports http proxies, which
you can point at Polipo. If you're only going
= 127.0.0.1:8118
See note above.
To resume an interrupted download, just add the -c option, like so:
wget -c your://url.to/download.here
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet
publicly available directory and arguing that their method is better,
while not mentioning bridges.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
On Tue, 25 May 2010 03:30:34 -0400 Justin Aplin jmap...@ufl.edu
wrote:
On May 25, 2010, at 2:45 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
I don't know who Censorship Research Center might be, but they
claim
to have a development project going for another encrypted proxy
service.
However
On Tue, 25 May 2010 05:55:34 -0400 Aplin, Justin M jmap...@ufl.edu
wrote:
On 5/25/2010 4:59 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
You may well be assuming too much. It's not easy to know at this
point because it's still undocumented vaporware. I still think the
whole thing smacks of being
On Tue, 25 May 2010 13:33:23 -0400 Ted Smith ted...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 01:45 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
I don't know who Censorship Research Center might be, but they claim
to have a development project going for another encrypted proxy service.
However, they say
Mike and Moritz,
Would you both *please* stop posting each message to multiple lists?
Thanks much.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
in a MyFamily statement now?
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
On Thu, 20 May 2010 07:37:17 + The23rd Raccoon
the.raccoo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
=A0 =A0 On Thu, 20 May 2010 00:40:42 -0400 =3D?utf-8?Q?Jerzy_=3DC5=3D81og=
iewa?=3D
jerz...@interia.eu wrote:
I apologize for altering
, and Sebastian have now
misdirected the discussion. Sigh.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
wrote.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
**
* A well
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 20 May 2010 15:12:38 -0400 Paul Syverson
syver...@itd.nrl.navy.mil wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 01:44:36PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
Oh. My. Goodness. Gracious! I go to sleep for a few hours, and the
discussion descends into total confusion because a number
in the same circuit as any of the blutmagie nodes. How would
that be an attack?
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
=
having a difficult time following the threads.
If you subscribed to this list after the start of the thread, just
go to the list archives, and look for my original message. It should
all then become clear.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
**
* A well regulated and disciplined
.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
**
* A well regulated and disciplined militia
that it is erratic on a minute-to-minute basis? Or
at various times of day? The graphs at the link he gave appeared damaged
in Firefox, appearing as straight, horizontal lines (yes, plural) in and
below the graph boundaries.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
the directory for similar cases.
It is entirely possible that others exist, but for now, it would be good
to eliminate the violators ASAP.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet
systems.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
On Thu, 06 May 2010 11:05:17 +0200 Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net
wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
On Wed, 5 May 2010 20:22:55 +0200 Borja Luaces borja.lua...@gmail=
=2Ecom
wrote:
I would like to know if it is possible to use tor as proxy for the com=
mand
line under linux (Ubuntu
On Thu, 06 May 2010 15:56:25 +0200 Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net
wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
On Thu, 06 May 2010 11:05:17 +0200 Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbau=
m.net
wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
On Wed, 5 May 2010 20:22:55 +0200 Borja Luaces borja.lua...@gma=
il=3D
that.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
**
* A well regulated and disciplined militia
of circuit
construction time, where the smoother is 5000 values wide, how can such jumps
occur? I guess I don't understand what algorithm is being used here. Any
clarification would be appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
' addresses
as public as possible.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:07:24 +0200 Hans Schnehl torvallena...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 01:35:20AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:36:17 -0400 Flamsmark flamsm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 26 April 2010 09:59, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:45:38 -0400 Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 08:51:32PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
I hope that, in the future, openssl.org will make some effort to
coordinate such things with the various operating system developers in
a way
attacked,
who shut it off, etc. If anyone else on this list noticed anything between
5:00 a.m. CDT and 8:00 a.m. CDT, please post the details here. Thanks!
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
itself at either of the sites mentioned in the latter article.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
the fixes for other
bugs, you would get the fix for this bug too. Let us know if it works.
Are there any ideas floating around yet as to why tor doesn't work
with openssl 1.0.0?
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
directory
fetch circuit timeout patch, at least as a temporary fix that might be
replaced by something better in 0.2.2.13-alpha?
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:21:33 -0400 Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:59:31PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
My weather satellite images got blocked again, due to the PrivacyNow
exit using OpenDNS with a misconfigured account and the fact
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:29:04 -0700 Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net
wrote:
Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:59:31PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
My weather satellite images got blocked again, due to the Privacy=
Now
exit using OpenDNS with a misconfigured account
.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
**
* A well regulated and disciplined militia
, I
would just let the notes fill up the log.
It's certainly worth further investigation. A phone call to the ISP
to find out what its policies and practices are about daily reboots and
so on might be well worth your time.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:54:16 -0400 Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org
wrote:
On 04/16/2010 12:59 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
My weather satellite images got blocked again, due to the PrivacyNow
exit using OpenDNS with a misconfigured account and the fact that
ExcludeExitNodes still
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 09:54:31 -0500 Bill Weiss houdini+...@clanspum.net
wrote:
Scott Bennett(benn...@cs.niu.edu)@Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 03:18:47AM -0500:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:54:16 -0400 Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org
wrote:
I may be misunderstanding the using opendns
on
record. If it has changed, then the current process will be blocked
network access until someone approves the new version of the checksum or
digest.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet
Running Stable V2Dir Valid
I ask again that the authorities quickly either assign a BadExit to that
node or, if they know how, contact its operator about the problem to get
it corrected.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:25:07 +0200 Sebastian Hahn m...@sebastianhahn.net
wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:17 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
Unfortunate (IMO), the latest versions have the support for .exit
either disabled or deleted, apparently leaving us no easy way to
perform
such tests. I've
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:23:35 +0200 Olaf Selke olaf.se...@blutmagie.de
wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
It appears memory consumption with the wrapped Linux malloc() is still
larger than than with openbsd-malloc I used before. Hugepages don't
appear to work with openbsd-malloc.
Okay
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:17:39 +0200 Sebastian Hahn m...@sebastianhahn.net
wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:25:07 +0200 Sebastian Hahn
m...@sebastianhahn.net
wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:17 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
Unfortunate (IMO
. :-(
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
**
* A well regulated
?
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
**
* A well regulated and disciplined militia
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Christian Kujau
li...@nerdbynature.de wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 at 05:58, Scott Bennett wrote:
and straighten us out. Remember that Olaf runs the highest-load-bearing
tor node in our whole network, and there are at least two or four dozen
others
to get his/her OpenDNS configuration
fixed (or switched to Google's open name servers or something similar), will
the authorities please flag PrivacyNow as a BadExit ASAP?
Thanks.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:00:52 +0200 Olaf Selke olaf.se...@blutmagie.de
wrote:
Christian Kujau wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 at 05:58, Scott Bennett wrote:
and straighten us out. Remember that Olaf runs the highest-load-bearing
tor node in our whole network, and there are at least two or four
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:23:35 +0200 Olaf Selke olaf.se...@blutmagie.de
wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
It appears memory consumption with the wrapped Linux malloc() is still
larger than than with openbsd-malloc I used before. Hugepages don't
appear to work with openbsd-malloc.
Okay
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:10:37 +0200 Arjan
n6bc23cpc...@list.nospam.xutrox.com wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
BTW, I know that there are *lots* of tor relays running on LINUX
systems whose operators are subscribed to this list. Don't leave Olaf and
me here swinging in the breeze. Please
Hi Arjan,
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:03:33 +0200 Arjan
Scott Bennett wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:10:37 +0200 Arjan
n6bc23cpc...@list.nospam.xutrox.com wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
BTW, I know that there are *lots* of tor relays running on LINUX
systems whose operators
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:43:21 +0200 Olaf Selke olaf.se...@blutmagie.de
wrote:
Scott Bennett schrieb:
In any case, your Xeon(s) ought to be able to benefit considerably from
running your gargantuan tor process in 4 MB pages instead of 4 KB pages.
the old blutmagie exit running in 2007
. It tells your client,
basically, to mark all existing circuits as being too old to use for new
streams and to build three new circuits proactively.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:04:36 +0200 Olaf Selke olaf.se...@blutmagie.de
wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
Either I forgot (probable) or you didn't mention before (less probable)
that you had moved it to a newer machine. Whatever you're running it on,
superpages or LINUX's huge pages ought
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:16:33 -0500 (CDT) I wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:04:36 +0200 Olaf Selke olaf.se...@blutmagie.de
wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
Either I forgot (probable) or you didn't mention before (less probable)
that you had moved it to a newer machine. Whatever you're
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:15:18 +0200 Olaf Selke olaf.se...@blutmagie.de
wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
Now that you've had tor running for a while, what does a
cat /proc/meminfo | grep -i hugepage show you? Also, 126 such pages
equal 256 MB of memory. Is that really enough to hold your
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:10:37 +0200 Arjan
n6bc23cpc...@list.nospam.xutrox.com wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
BTW, I know that there are *lots* of tor relays running on LINUX
systems whose operators are subscribed to this list. Don't leave Olaf and
me here swinging in the breeze. Please
by the relays themselves. The values in the consensus
documents alone are, a priori, worthless.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
Hi Olaf,
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:11:36 +0200 Olaf Selke olaf.se...@blutmagie.de
wrote:
Scott Bennett schrieb:
Observed by what? If it has anything to do with the numbers
given in the consensus documents, then the only value such graphs
would have would be for the purpose
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 06:12:43 -0500 (CDT) I wrote:
Hi Olaf,
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:11:36 +0200 Olaf Selke olaf.se...@blutmagie.de
wrote:
Scott Bennett schrieb:
Observed by what? If it has anything to do with the numbers
given in the consensus documents, then the only value
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 15:23:16 +0200 Olaf Selke olaf.se...@blutmagie.de
wrote:
Scott Bennett schrieb:
I see I missed the implication in Olaf's main complaint above, which
is that the authorities are advertising more capacity for his node than
his node is advertising.
relax, I'm
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:05:06 -0600 Kasimir Gabert kasimi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
=A0 =A0 On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 15:23:16 +0200 Olaf Selke olaf.se...@blutmag=
ie.de
wrote:
[snipped]
maybe I take your advice and add php code
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:29:57 +0200 Mitar mmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
It wouldn't be airtight, to be sure, but it would
greatly shrink the window of opportunity for censors to cut bridge users
off from the tor network
.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
**
* A well regulated and disciplined
and
get running. A couple of days ago, a new book by Dru Lavigne was announced
on the freebsd-announce list. I'll try to forward you a copy of the
announcement off this list.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
a relay of any type
behind a NATing router, one does have to configure the router with the
appropriate RDR for port forwarding, although I confess I've never played
with BINAT and therefore have no idea whether there might be a way to make
it work for tor.
Scott
I'm just starting to
go through nearly two weeks' accumulation of email. Agghhh...
Am Freitag, den 12.03.2010, 19:31 -0600 schrieb Scott Bennett:
Well, as I've pointed out in the past, the values in cached-consensu=
s=20
do *not* accurately reflect either the traffic load that your relay has
10-second burst
rate, then the value to trust is the one in your relay's descriptors that
appear in the cached-descriptors{,.new} files.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet
offering full service over ISPs
that don't. It might also be worthwhile to start a complaint-to-the-FCC
campaign to report misleading advertising by ISPs that offer only partial
access but market it as Internet access as if it were full access.
Scott Bennett, Comm
that it closed
the ORPort and is now running just as a client.
Does anyone have any clue why these messages are being issued? Should
I just shut it down and restart it?
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
1 - 100 of 623 matches
Mail list logo
