On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 20:32:26 -0500, misc wrote:
The function MapAddress in tor config no longer works.
Tor simply ignores it and connect using any node. Any solutions?
Tor 0.2.0.33/Vidalia 0.1.9
What am I doing wrong?
Please advise how to make MapAddress setting to work in Tor config
The function MapAddress in tor config no longer works.
Tor simply ignores it and connect using any node. Any solutions?
Tor 0.2.0.33/Vidalia 0.1.9
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:32:43 +0200, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
misc wrote:
Is there any way at all to get keys from LDAP server through Tor?
LDAP uses TCP, so yes, it should be working if you configure GnuPG to
use a proxy.
Alex.
GnuPG only has options for HTTP proxy. But LDAP doesn't
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:39:48 -0700, scar wrote:
i think if you are using Torbutton in Firefox and have the default
options set, then it is OK to use java: Torbutton will block all
malicious attempts by Java/Javascript to bypass your anonymity.
is that a reasonable assumption?
I really
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:07:14 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 09:28:04PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.6K bytes
in 13 lines about:
: i think if you are using Torbutton in Firefox and have the default
: options set, then it is OK to use java: Torbutton will block all
:
Is it possible to run GnuPG through Tor? (when connecting to LDAP and HKP
servers to exchange keys)?
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:14:37 +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Is there a way to tune TCPIP parameteres in Windows to better work with Tor?
Short answer -- no. Tor's slowness is at the application layer, you
won't achieve much by tweaking the transport layer.
For example, should
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:38:58 -0800, Mike Perry wrote:
Thus spake kazaam ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
A few comments on this. First off, the fact that window sizes factor
into a hash means as soon as you resize your window 1 pixel, they get
a completely new identifier, uncorrelated to the previous
Is there a way to torrify UDP (I'm not talking about DNS) and ICMP?
For example how can I ping somebody through Tor?
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:27:03 -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 01:21:59PM -0400, misc wrote:
Is there a way to torrify UDP (I'm not talking about DNS) and ICMP?
For example how can I ping somebody through Tor?
No. At least, not in 2007.
http://wiki.noreply.org
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:22:26 -0400, Jay Goodman Tamboli wrote:
On Sep 20, 2007, at 12:02:50, misc wrote:
Well, it's is not working. I 'm still getting e-mails from the
list, just
as before, including all the messages posted this morning.
I think the idea of the whitelist is that you
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:26:28 +1000, Steven Huf wrote:
Would you be able to tell me how to unsubscribe then please?
Send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with empty subject and body containing
text:
unsubscribe or-talk
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:42:43 +1000, Steven Huf wrote:
Quote: How can I put this list into no-mail mode (so that I do not
receive any
e-mails from it)?
Same, it's really filling up my inbox unnecessarily...
On 9/17/07, misc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I put this list into no-mail
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:43:41 -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
The answer is that you should mail me and I'll whitelist your
address -- then you can post while not receiving mails.
Thanks Roger. I guess I was expecting to find an automated way of doing
this. With Mailman one can just send
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:42:32 +0100, Robert Hogan wrote:
TorK allows you to do this (in a rough and ready way using the geoip database
(maxmind.com) - about 9x% accurate). TorK is available only for Linux/BSD
unfortunately, but you could you use the Incognito LiveCD which uses TorK as
the
How can I put this list into no-mail mode (so that I do not receive any
e-mails from it)?
I'm accessing it using the newsreader, so I do not need hundreds of e-mails
simultaneously going to my e-mail account.
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:57:51 -0500 (CDT), Scott Bennett wrote:
Why would they waste their time? They will have already gotten copies
of what they want as it traveled in the clear between its origin and the web
server. Remember the news articles a while back about all those snoop boxes
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:47:56 -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
The best option is to run a squid server on localhost with a block by
country filter. Then, route your tor client through it.
Comrade Ringo Kamens
I researched it more and everybody is saying squid goes between the browser
and tor:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:39:17 -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
I don't think you get the problem here. Squid wouldn't be able to
affect the choice of exit nodes. It would just be able to filter entry
nodes.
Comrade Ringo Kamens
I know how to filter entry nodes. I can do it with Protowall or another
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:20:16 -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
AFAIK tor connects to an entry guard which then connects to the exit
node for you. This way, they can't take the logs from the exit node
and go well.. the IP in question connected to you 20 seconds before
the alleged connection was
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:17:14 -0500 (CDT), Scott Bennett wrote:
Please read the tor documentation. If you think you've already done
that, please go back and read it again.
That brings back the pain of reading it the first time :)
I must admit I gave up after first few pages. I found it
21 matches
Mail list logo
