Juliusz Chroboczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this results in a perceptible performance improvement for general
browsing.
I think so too, but some people disagree. Since I don't want to get
into this discussion again, I refer you to the following friendly flamewar.
Additionally
Michael_google gmail_Gersten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/21/07, Alexander W. Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/21/07, Nick Mathewson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Short answer: Tor tries to group many streams on a single circuit. If
we didn't, that would be way too much PK.
Means,
On Friday 21 September 2007 19:34:09 Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
On 9/21/07, Arrakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys, quick question.
If I have Tor process running, and request a url that has 10 images to
load from the same domain, do all the requests go through the same
circuit, or
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:06:39 -0700 Michael_google gmail_Gersten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/21/07, Alexander W. Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/21/07, Nick Mathewson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Short answer: Tor tries to group many streams on a single circuit. If
we didn't, that
- privoxy will use new streams on the same circuit for each of the images
- polipo will generally pipeline everything over the same stream
Not quite. Polipo will try to use up to n simultaneous connections to
a given server, where n is
- 2 for a server that can do pipelining;
- 4 for a
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:06:39PM -0700, Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
If you have a web page with 30 sub-fetches (images, style sheets,
script files, etc), then they will all fetch over a single circuit.
It does NOT make sense from a performance point of view. Since
everything will
On 9/22/07, Roger Dingledine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once upon a time, the value of 10 minutes was actually more like 1
minute. You see, the shorter it is, the fewer actions from the user are
linkable with each other based on being in the same circuit. But Tor
server operaters complained they
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 03:51:07PM -0400, Anthony DiPierro wrote:
If the user started churning through circuits at five times the current
rate, we may end up forced to move the 10 minute value back even farther
to compensate, resulting in even more user connections becoming linkable.
Why
Alex,
That is exactly the distinction I am looking for.
Does Tor care about the destination of the TCP request, when deciding to
make a new circuit, and thus will use one because it is already dirtied
by that domain?
Steve
Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
However, considering your question... It
On 9/21/07, Arrakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Tor care about the destination of the TCP request, when deciding to
make a new circuit, and thus will use one because it is already dirtied
by that domain?
s/domain/IP-address ?
However, that's all up to the implementation of the internal
On 9/21/07, Alexander W. Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/21/07, Nick Mathewson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Short answer: Tor tries to group many streams on a single circuit. If
we didn't, that would be way too much PK.
Means, if the browser opens up 6 instances to grab stuff from a
11 matches
Mail list logo
