Re: end-to-end encryption? SSL? GnuPG?

The problem is people are extensively using webmail. They can use mobile Tor (TorPark), but the problem is the content of the webmail is not encrypted. So they can get anonymity, but not end-to-end encryption (so anonymity is also downgraded). I've heard a rumor about this amazing new

Re: end-to-end encryption? SSL? GnuPG?

xiando wrote: I agree that your idea of using GnuPG for everything is excellent. The IM client PSI is only one of many IM programs who now support using GnuPG for chatting. I agree that websites serving pages using GnuPG and Firefox - and every other browser out there - supporting it. I

Re[2]: end-to-end encryption? SSL? GnuPG?

Watson, Calm down. I am coming up with a solution. Including Torbird. The whole thing will be end to end. ST Saturday, October 21, 2006, 12:06:40 PM, you wrote: xiando wrote: I agree that your idea of using GnuPG for everything is excellent. The IM client PSI is only one of many IM

Re[2]: end-to-end encryption? SSL? GnuPG?

Last, you mentioned Torpark. It's an .EXE, what's this .exe for? What else have these people come up with? Are you aware of this: http://sowd5dpn54rk2srl.onion/Back_Orifice info? Perhaps there is a simpler solution, download Tor, Polipo and Firefox Portable and make a .bat file (instead