Re: more on the Comcast 250 GB/mo. problem

2009-03-14 Thread John Brooks
There is absolutely value to running tor residentially - the extra nodes add significantly to the anonymity aspects of Tor. However, it is not true that 1,000 20KB nodes is the same amount of bandwidth to clients as 10 2000KB nodes. The slowest node in a connection is going to define the maximum

Re: more on the Comcast 250 GB/mo. problem

2009-03-14 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:46:54PM +0100, slush wrote: Btw, Im also running one Tor exit on cable Internet. I have not any traffic monitoring, but expect that Im also near to 300GB/month and Im I've just looked, and I'm currently over 1 TByte/month on a 32/2 MBit/s cable modem. just

Re: more on the Comcast 250 GB/mo. problem

2009-03-14 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 01:12:23AM -0400, pho...@rootme.org wrote: Actually, there is value to running a Tor server on residential broadband. Most tcp internet usage doesn't need huge amounts of Of course I meant that if your ISP prevents you from running a Tor node you can still run a Tor

more on the Comcast 250 GB/mo. problem

2009-03-13 Thread Scott Bennett
Last week I found a voice mail message from a phone number I didn't recognize, who claimed to be from the Comcast Security Assurance Division, demanding that I call them at yet another number I didn't recognize. I called the normal number to reach Comcast, explained what had happened, and

Re: more on the Comcast 250 GB/mo. problem

2009-03-13 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 04:12:34AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: The only suggestion from any of the Comcast employees on how I might get around a 250 GB/mo. limit was that switching to Comcast Business-class service might do it, but they didn't know for sure because they only dealt with

Re: more on the Comcast 250 GB/mo. problem

2009-03-13 Thread Matthew McCabe
Scott- Sorry to hear that you are also having problems with your ISP. I ended up dropping Time Warner and signing up for Earthlink - which actually uses the same TWC network. So now I am back on TWC and must watch my p's and q's or I will be kicked off. I even have the same TWC account

Re: more on the Comcast 250 GB/mo. problem

2009-03-13 Thread Michael G. Reed
Oh, don't be deluded into thinking they give a rats-ass about Business Customers either - I used to have a business account from TWC because I telecommuted and needed multiple static IPs and no restrictions on the linein the early days they were responsive to problems/issues, but near

Re: more on the Comcast 250 GB/mo. problem

2009-03-13 Thread slush
Hi Scott, dont forget, that your's ISP last mile connectity is not sized for running high-traffic servers. They count with aggregation, because dont expect many users running any kind of server application. And I think there is nothing illegal in their business. If you want to run fast server,

Re: more on the Comcast 250 GB/mo. problem

2009-03-13 Thread phobos
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:22:49AM +0100, eu...@leitl.org wrote 1.0K bytes in 19 lines about: : There's not much point running Tor on capped residential broadband. : Rent a server with a decent traffic plan and throttle your Tor so : you're within limits. Actually, there is value to running a

Re: more on the Comcast 250 GB/mo. problem

2009-03-13 Thread F. Fox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 kitsune runs on residential broadband, and handles plenty of traffic within its bandwidth class. It's good to see the server's link light blinking. =:oD - -- F. Fox Owner of Tor node kitsune http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com -BEGIN PGP