Re: cached-routers by e-mail please

On 7/27/07, Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Download http://rapidshare.com/files/45347171/cached-status.zip and extract it to your .tor/cached-status/ directory. With this I seem to have a compatibility problem due to different versions: Jul 27 15:10:18.313 [warn] parse error: Malformed object:

Re: cached-routers by e-mail please

Dago Watt wrote: [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit Download http://rapidshare.com/files/45347171/cached-status.zip and extract it to your .tor/cached-status/ directory.

Re: Excessive bandwidth use

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:54:00PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: So it does! Despite the fact that, when reading the docs, I said to myself pay attention - they measure KB rather than Kb, I made the mistake. Thanks for spotting it. Great. So just so we make sure we're on the same page here,

Re: cached-routers by e-mail please

On 7/27/07, Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://rapidshare.com/files/45351452/0.1.2.13-routers-and-status.zip Thanks again for trying to help. However, the warnings remain the same, and still... [notice] While fetching directory info, no running dirservers known. Will try again later. (purpose

Re: flash in a stand-alone player

http://janusvm.com Transparent Proxyenough said. On 7/26/07, scar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, we all know the threats of watching flash .swf in the browser. but, what about downloading the .swf via Tor and watching it in a stand-alone player? no more threat to anonymity, or not?

Re: Excessive bandwidth use

Roger Dingledine wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 12:45:12PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: I'm running an OR called hamakor [snip] Can anyone shed some light as to why the bandwidth limits I set are not being respected? You have rate limited it to 800KB/s, and from the

Re: cached-routers by e-mail please

Dago Watt wrote: Could someone please send me his .tor/cached-routers by e-mail. After having been off-line I don't have enough directory information to build a circuit, and the web-proxy blocks the regular directory look-up. http://rapidshare.com/files/45336108/routers.zip

Excessive bandwidth use

Hi all, I'm running an OR called hamakor (http://torstatus.kgprog.com/router_detail.php?FP=086e9be9865f75f7cbafa1fb03968ce1ef537a17). It is being run on a server that belongs to an NPO that promotes FOSS, and the server is hosted, free of charge, curtsy of our ISP. As such, it is very important

Re: Excessive bandwidth use

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 12:45:12PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: I'm running an OR called hamakor [snip] Can anyone shed some light as to why the bandwidth limits I set are not being respected? You have rate limited it to 800KB/s, and from the graphs I can see, it appears to be using roughly

initial directory bandwidth?

Hi all, I used TOR around a year back, but couldn't use it much as initial setting up (directory and initializations) took up around 1 mb of my download. Multiply that by 7 or 8 reboots per day and I lost serious bandwidth.. What is the situation now? How much does the directory weigh (if

cached-routers by e-mail please

Could someone please send me his .tor/cached-routers by e-mail. After having been off-line I don't have enough directory information to build a circuit, and the web-proxy blocks the regular directory look-up. Best regards, Dago

Re: Excessive bandwidth use

Roger Dingledine wrote: So just so we make sure we're on the same page here, when the docs say K you mean 1000, and when you say M you mean 1,000,000, right? Or are you one of those people who count bytes in a little over the metric meaning of the suffixes? K is 110, and M is 120.

Re: cached-routers by e-mail please

On 7/27/07, Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://rapidshare.com/files/45336108/routers.zip Thank you, but I could not get a circuit even with you router- information, and now I think I may be doing something wrong. As normally, I use in torrc PreferTunneledDirConns 1 TunnelDirConns 1 and I

Re: cached-routers by e-mail please

Well, the owner of the firewall could just block the dirservers. Their IPs are well known and public. Comrade Ringo Kamens On 7/27/07, Michael Holstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dago Watt wrote: Could someone please send me his .tor/cached-routers by e-mail. After having been off-line I

Re: initial directory bandwidth?

On 7/27/07, Anil Gulecha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I used TOR around a year back, but couldn't use it much as initial setting up (directory and initializations) took up around 1 mb of my download. Multiply that by 7 or 8 reboots per day and I lost serious bandwidth.. What is the

Re: flash in a stand-alone player

Arrakis @ 2007/07/26 22:39: The question is if the stand-alone player, just like regular flash player, phones home without regard to your proxy settings. if that's the only concern, then one need only an open-source flash .swf player. such a thing exist? or perhaps a firefox plugin that

Re: flash in a stand-alone player

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 02:35:26PM -0700, scar wrote: if that's the only concern, then one need only an open-source flash .swf player. such a thing exist? You may want to look at http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/ Dave -- Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: initial directory bandwidth?

On 7/28/07, Michael_google gmail_Gersten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/27/07, Anil Gulecha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I used TOR around a year back, but couldn't use it much as initial setting up (directory and initializations) took up around 1 mb of my download. Multiply that by

Re: cached-routers by e-mail please

On 27/07/07, Michael Holstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dago Watt wrote: Could someone please send me his .tor/cached-routers by e-mail. After having been off-line I don't have enough directory information to build a circuit, and the web-proxy blocks the regular directory look-up.