Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 6:10 AM, twinkletoedtur...@safe-mail.net wrote:
This thread is being forked from the original as it doesn't entirely
depend on the user(s) using bridges and this problem. I understand
the purpose of Tor and know individuals, organizations, as well
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:46:18 -0500 Nick Mathewson ni...@freehaven.net
wrote:
2010/2/12 ilter y=FCksel ilteryuk...@gmail.com:
Hello,
For exit router selection path-spec says that;
For circuits that do not need to be fast, when choosing among multiple
candidates for a path element, we
or could this be a problem of privoxy handling all tor clients? I think it's
no problem to run a privoxy instance for each tor client, but I can't find a
config option in tor, which specifies the port of privoxy?
- Original Message -
From: i...@web-unity.de
To: or-t...@seul.org
Sent:
I've recently had conversations with some activists in Europe who want
to run unpublished exit nodes (meaning they set PublishServerDescriptor
0 in their torrc). Of course, one risk is the only people using this
unlisted exit node are those in the social graph of the activists.
Slightly
On 2/12/10, Michael Holstein michael.holst...@csuohio.edu wrote:
Could you bind your exit traffic to IPs outside your University's
primary block?
Not sure what you mean by bind to outside IP, but our network is a
contiguous /16. We would have to register for extra /24s from ARIN, and
that
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 23:45 -0500, and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:27:26AM -0800, j...@jcosby.com wrote 0.3K bytes in
10 lines about:
: I just noticed that on closing a Firefox session, google cookies are not
: removed. I have to toggle Tor to remove them. Is this
On 13 February 2010 14:16, Jon Cosby j...@jcosby.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 23:45 -0500, and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:27:26AM -0800, j...@jcosby.com wrote 0.3K
bytes in 10 lines about:
: I just noticed that on closing a Firefox session, google cookies are
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:03:28 -0500, Flamsmark wrote: On 13 February
2010 14:16, Jon Cosby wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 23:45 -0500,
and...@torproject.org [2] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:27:26AM
-0800, j...@jcosby.com [3] wrote 0.3K bytes in 10 lines about:
: I just
noticed that on
Hi,
when interacting with tor control I can get the circuit with command
getinfo circuit-status. What's a bit confusing for me, there are more
than one circuits:
getinfo circuit-status
250+circuit-status=
51 BUILT rueckgrat,myrnaloy,$2DDAC53D4E7A556483ACE6859A57A63849F2C4F6
PURPOSE=GENERAL
Thus spake and...@torproject.org (and...@torproject.org):
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 05:27:21AM -0500, twinkletoedtur...@safe-mail.net
wrote 5.1K bytes in 106 lines about:
: This has already been discussed previously, I was moving on to ask if
: this feature could be added, not debated.
The
Not sure about the first question (my guess would be either multiple
circuits are built for added bandwidth or for complimentary exit
policies - docs or someone else could answer this).
As for the second question, I'm assuming that entries using nickname
(verses a fingerprint like
11 matches
Mail list logo
