Re: Very low performance in CriptolabTORRelays*

2010-12-03 Thread Mike Perry
Thus spake Daniel Franganillo (dani...@dilmun.ls.fi.upm.es): Our ISP wont say nothing about their filters (It seems to be a Top Secret issue :P). As I said before there's no problem reported at debug.log except for the frequent: [debug] TLS error: unexpected close while reading

Re: Very low performance in CriptolabTORRelays*

2010-12-03 Thread Olaf Selke
On 03.12.2010 08:40, Daniel Franganillo wrote: Well, im not asking for help to run a Tor relay, I did it for more than a year without problems. Im asking for help to gather intel so I can make an statement to our ISP (I work at a Dept. in a univeristy) to unblock Tor. why don't you ask

Re: Help me diagnose my Tor blocked/censored ISP!

2010-12-03 Thread Mike Perry
Actually, let's break this thread off into a new one with new subject, too. Sorry about the double-post. Just want to make sure this hits the search engines. Thus spake Daniel Franganillo (dani...@dilmun.ls.fi.upm.es): Our ISP wont say nothing about their filters (It seems to be a Top Secret

strange messages

2010-12-03 Thread M
Hey again: i am getting this new message in forefox: Torbutton Sandbox evaluation failed. Date hooks not applied! Any clues?

Re: Very low performance in CriptolabTORRelays*

2010-12-03 Thread Daniel Franganillo
El 03/12/10 09:18, Olaf Selke escribió: On 03.12.2010 08:40, Daniel Franganillo wrote: Well, im not asking for help to run a Tor relay, I did it for more than a year without problems. Im asking for help to gather intel so I can make an statement to our ISP (I work at a Dept. in a univeristy)

Re: Very low performance in CriptolabTORRelays*

2010-12-03 Thread Moritz Bartl
Hi, On 03.12.2010 13:12, Olaf Selke wrote: At least my relay holds a couple of connections to Cryptolab. We (torservers) do, too. About the same amount of connections. Moritz *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to

Tor Portable

2010-12-03 Thread Koh Choon Lin
I have tried Tor Portable on both Windows XP and Ubuntu. On both platform, the included extension HTTPS-Everywhere does not work at all, ie. no rules for any site like Facebook. Is this behavior expected? Thanks for any answer to my query!

Re: Very low performance in CriptolabTORRelays*

2010-12-03 Thread Justin Aplin
On Dec 3, 2010, at 3:14 AM, Mike Perry wrote: [snip] Nope. Transfer rates are equally ridiculous. Tried in windows, same. [/snip] Out of curiosity, how long are you letting these tests run for? My nodes generally take a full 2 or 3 days to get up to full capacity, and even then, traffic

Re: Tor Portable

2010-12-03 Thread Justin Aplin
On Dec 3, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Koh Choon Lin wrote: I have tried Tor Portable on both Windows XP and Ubuntu. On both platform, the included extension HTTPS-Everywhere does not work at all, ie. no rules for any site like Facebook. Is this behavior expected? I see this as well in the 1.3.13

Re: Arm Release 1.4.0

2010-12-03 Thread Fabian Keil
Damian Johnson atag...@gmail.com wrote: The lsof command issued by arm [1] is: lsof -nPi | grep process\s*pid.*(ESTABLISHED) I'd be happy to work with you to provide a fix, if you'd like. Once upon a time I tried to use VMs to troubleshoot FreeBSD and Gentoo issues (thus far they're the

Re: Arm Release 1.4.0

2010-12-03 Thread John Case
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Fabian Keil wrote: - Be available to test a potential fix. If you're up for that then I'm glad to have the help! Lets take further discussion of this off the list. I don't think this is generally of interest to the rest of the tor community. -Damian It's at least

Re: Arm Release 1.4.0

2010-12-03 Thread Damian Johnson
Perfect! I'll try to provide a fix for you to test later today or tomorrow. I intent to try Arm in the future. Are you aware of anyone working on a port? Nope. Jesse just finished an ebuild for Gentoo: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341731 and I'm working with Peter on a deb. But thus

Re: Arm Release 1.4.0

2010-12-03 Thread Hans Schnehl
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:34:46PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote: Damian Johnson atag...@gmail.com wrote: The lsof command issued by arm [1] is: lsof -nPi | grep process\s*pid.*(ESTABLISHED) What I'll need from you is the following: - A command that, when executed as the tor user,

Re: Arm Release 1.4.0

2010-12-03 Thread John Case
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Hans Schnehl wrote: Sorry for jumping in , but please notice the above command might not not work on all versions of FBSD, at least it doesn't on a 7-Stable jail. Maybe the following just produces a similar sufficient output: _...@ato# id uid=256(_tor) gid=256(_tor)

Re: Arm Release 1.4.0

2010-12-03 Thread Hans Schnehl
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:35:39PM +, John Case wrote: On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Hans Schnehl wrote: Sorry for jumping in , but please notice the above command might not not work on all versions of FBSD, at least it doesn't on a 7-Stable jail. Not working refers to Fabian's use of

Re: Arm Release 1.4.0

2010-12-03 Thread John Case
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Hans Schnehl wrote: specifically: ps -Al after polling for lsof and a foreach loop, doesn't work ? I know it's not elegant, but it appeared to me that: lsof + ps -Al would work ... especially if the system in question is doing little (or nothing) other than Tor ... I

[notice] Circuit build measurement period of 218915ms is more than twice the maximum build time we have ever observed. Capping it to 152350ms.

2010-12-03 Thread Orionjur Tor-admin
I have the above record in '/var/tor/log' on my exit-node. What it can mean?! *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/