On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:44 +, John Case c...@sdf.lonestar.org
wrote:
There are a small number of easily identifiable cons to letting an exit
run like this, and there are an unlimited number of unknown pros to
letting an exit run like this. You should know this.
Leaving aside the
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 10:18 +0100, Karsten N.
tor-ad...@privacyfoundation.de wrote:
Am 09.02.2011 10:06, schrieb Karsten N.:
(I did found an other solution for SMTP)
Sorry - I did NOT found an other solution. :-(
For webmail it is the same problem. Most webmail provider add the sender
IP
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:21 -0500, Aplin, Justin M jmap...@ufl.edu
wrote:
On 2/3/2011 8:28 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
I am using Torbutton. It is supposed to Torrify Firefox - yes?
In a roundabout way, yes. Torbutton forwards Firefox traffic to Polipo,
which in turn sends the traffic to the
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:30 -0600, Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com
wrote:
On 2/2/2011 5:54 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
I came to the conclusion that it
was Polipo cacheing. You can try inserting a 'Pragma: No-cache' header
using Modify Headers or a similar addon, though that does make you stand
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:27 -0600, Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com
wrote:
Using latest stable Vidalia / Tor bundle for Win (Vista x64).
Never really had this prob before installing latest ver, but could be
coincidence. When using Tor/ Torbutton, only one site gave message (to
the effect)
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:56 -0500, Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org
wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:20:10 +
Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net wrote:
Thank you Juliusz, I appreciate your efforts.
Clearly Tor needs to ship with a working Polipo, so if this is a real
fault would
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:24 -0600, David Carlson
carlson...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Hi,
I am forbidden to access the server yelp.com. Is that because I am a
Tor exit node?
Thanks
David
I can confirm this, after accidentally running an exit for a while.
There is a mailto link on the 403
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:33 +, Matthew pump...@cotse.net wrote:
Each relay removes one layer of encryption.
Tor does *not* encrypt and send packet headers. Tor only relays the
data within a TCP connection.
OK. I get it. I think.
Please confirm:
The data is encrypted. The
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:20 -0800, Robert Ransom
rransom.8...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:59:49 +
Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net wrote:
how do I report a bug with the Polipo in
https://www.torproject.org/dist/vidalia-bundles/vidalia-bundle-0.2.2.22-alpha-0.2.10-ppc.dmg
'Failed to open GEOIP file /Applications/Vidalia.app/share/tor/geoip'
There is no /Applications/Vidalia.app/share directory in the latest PPC
Vidalia bundle.
And should I raise a bug ticket about this, or is it in hand with the
package developers?
GD
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than
Hi list,
I know for a fact that there is at least one GB exit running, but
ExitNodes {gb}
StrictNodes 1
no longer works - no circuits get built.
Tor 0.2.2.21-alpha (git-5f63f0d6312d9f0d) PPC OSX10.3.9
No flags next to the relays in Vidalia either - I thought that was due
to be fixed.
GD
--
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 17:07 -0500, Nick Mathewson ni...@freehaven.net
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net
wrote:
Hi list,
I know for a fact that there is at least one GB exit running, but
ExitNodes {gb}
StrictNodes 1
no longer works
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 17:07 -0500, Nick Mathewson ni...@freehaven.net
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net
wrote:
Hi list,
I know for a fact that there is at least one GB exit running, but
ExitNodes {gb}
StrictNodes 1
no longer works
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:32 +0100, Erinn Clark er...@torproject.org
wrote:
* Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net [2011:01:20 12:56 +]:
The Polipo in
https://www.torproject.org/dist/vidalia-bundles/vidalia-bundle-0.2.2.21-alpha-0.2.10-ppc-1.dmg
is broken:
dyld: /Applications
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:11 -0500, Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu
wrote:
Tor 0.2.2.21-alpha includes all the patches from Tor 0.2.1.29, which
continues our recent code security audit work. The main fix resolves
a remote heap overflow vulnerability that can allow remote code
execution
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 11:05 -0500, Nick Mathewson ni...@freehaven.net
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net
wrote:
Hi All,
Happy New Year.
I have double entries, including the timestamp, in my Notice-level Tor
logs. I think it started when I sent
Hi All,
Happy New Year.
I have double entries, including the timestamp, in my Notice-level Tor
logs. I think it started when I sent a SIGHUP. lsof shows two Write
file descriptors fwiw. This is Tor 0.2.2.15-alpha OSX PPC, Vidalia is
not running.
Any ideas?
TIA
GD
--
http://www.fastmail.fm -
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:49 -0500, Justin Aplin jmap...@ufl.edu wrote:
On Dec 20, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Geoff Down wrote:
All Tor users should upgrade.
Thanks Roger.
Any progress on the PPC build machine?
GD
If you're comfortable building from source on your PPC machine, I've
just
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:20 -0500, . pe...@aleksandrsolzhenitsyn.net
wrote:
I just got the following error message when I tried to start using Tor
on Firefox;
/The proxy server is refusing connections
Firefox is configured to use a proxy server that is refusing
connections./
How
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:34 -0800, Mike Perry mikepe...@fscked.org
wrote:
Turns out that wget can be 302d between schemes to cause you to bypass
proxy settings. For example, if you have the $HTTP_PROXY environment
variable set but nothing for $HTTPS_PROXY, a 302 to an https url will
cause you
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:05 -0500, Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu
wrote:
Tor 0.2.2.18-alpha fixes several crash bugs that have been nagging
us lately, makes unpublished bridge relays able to detect their IP
address, and fixes a wide variety of other bugs to get us much closer
to a stable
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:28 +, Anon Mus
my.green.lant...@googlemail.com wrote:
Using vidalia 0.2.7, Tor 0.2.2.10-alpha (Qt 4.5.3)
I am not seeing any location in the left box (or anywhere else) against
Tor relays, just a ? in a white box.
Is anyone else seeing this?
I asked this on
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 19:16 -0800, Robert Ransom
rransom.8...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 03:07:43 +
Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net wrote:
Hi,
I don't use Vidalia much, so I can't say how long this has been the
case, but the last couple of times I have started it up
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 08:05 -0600, Jon torance...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
I wrote:
http://news.antiwar.com/2010/11/05/us-censors-muslim-websites-list-of-british-mps-who-supported-iraq-war/
Using exit chuckthecanuck
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 08:29 -0600, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu
wrote:
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 14:17:20 + Geoff Down
geoffd...@fastmail.net
wrote:
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 08:05 -0600, Jon torance...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu
Hi,
I don't use Vidalia much, so I can't say how long this has been the
case, but the last couple of times I have started it up (with Tor
already running) there has been no GeoIP data - no flags in the relay
list, no lines on the map. I've not observed any calls to the GeoIP
server either.
Tor's
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 13:37 +0200, Olaf Selke olaf.se...@blutmagie.de
wrote:
On 09.10.2010 11:38, Anon Mus wrote:
Prior to end August 2010, if this kind of message was received I just
used to close the circuit and try again. Usually it would resolve by the
3rd try. I tested these exits
[warn] The configuration option 'StrictExitNodes' is deprecated; use
'StrictNodes' instead.
It would help if such an option were documented in
https://www.torproject.org/tor-manual.html.en
or shipped in the expert install package.
Where is it documented please?
GD
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - A
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:07 -0400, Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org
wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:57:42 +0100
Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net wrote:
[warn] The configuration option 'StrictExitNodes' is deprecated; use
'StrictNodes' instead.
It would help if such an option were
Hi,
just installed Tor 0.2.2.15-alpha (git-eba3f37f17a2af4f) PPC, got the
following
'Oct 02 22:11:19.841 [warn] Corrupt state file? Build times count
mismatch. Read 29 times, but file says 1900544
Oct 02 22:11:19.850 [warn] or_state_save_broken(): Bug: Unable to parse
state in [tor data
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:55 -0400, and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 05:19:00PM +0200, tor...@ymail.com wrote 0.4K
bytes in 12 lines about:
solved:
It is irritating but one has to tick:
Start the Tor software when Vidalia starts
even if Vidalia just connects to a
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:55 +0100, Matthew pump...@cotse.net wrote:
Hello,
I have yet another question that relates to the effectiveness of Tor.
Gmail (and therefore presumably other webmail operators) knows my
computer's time zone. It does not know the time per se but the time
zone
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:25 +0200, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote:
Hi,
Gregory Maxwell wrote (22 Aug 2010 00:55:49 GMT) :
I think it's obvious that the best way of using tor is running your
torrified apps in a VM which can only access the outside world via
TOR.
I doubt there is
Would the owner of exit Poul (B8EB 1587 F2C8 7E3D C05A 08E7 A68F 375B
5B23 368F) please turn off OpenDNS URL blacklisting.
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 09:20 -0400, Ted Smith ted...@gmail.com wrote:
An exit enclave is when a service operates a Tor exit node with an
exit policy permitting exiting to that service. Tor will automagically
extend circuits built to that host from three hops to four, such that
your traffic
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 18:19 +0200, morphium morph...@morphium.info
wrote:
An exit enclave is when a service operates a Tor exit node with an
exit policy permitting exiting to that service. Tor will automagically
extend circuits built to that host from three hops to four, such that
your
Would the owner of exit Jisunglove
F098 38C3 7C31 1C59 8307 A4B2 BE7C 55AF 740E 5371
please turn of OpenDNS URL filtering.
GD
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Send your email first class
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to
On 13 Dec 2008, at 02:02, Jon wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geoff Down wrote:
Should I raise this as a bug at Flyspray? Vidalia can see relay
status etc, and shut down Tor without the password being entered.
They are both running as the same user however. GD On 8 Dec
Should I raise this as a bug at Flyspray?
Vidalia can see relay status etc, and shut down Tor without the
password being entered.
They are both running as the same user however.
GD
On 8 Dec 2008, at 12:26, Geoff Down wrote:
OSX10.3.9 , and yes, I was able to change identity, see the network
OSX10.3.9 , and yes, I was able to change identity, see the network map
etc.
GD
On 8 Dec 2008, at 06:51, Jon wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geoff Down wrote:
Hi,
previously, if I started Vidalia when Tor was already running, I
would be asked for the password.
Has
Hi,
previously, if I started Vidalia when Tor was already running, I would
be asked for the password.
Has this changed in 0.2.0.32 ? The torrc's I use for Vidalia or for the
command line are different (and therefore the passwords are different).
GD
Thank you, is a new version for OSX10.3.9 on the way?
GD
On 4 Dec 2008, at 17:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:34:16PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 4.4K
bytes in 97 lines about:
For OS X users, there is a packaging bugfix in 0.2.0.32 labelled as
0.2.0.32a in the
-ppc.dmg
still worked to restore the status-quo-ante.
On 4 Dec 2008, at 18:20, Geoff Down wrote:
That's a binary install?
I tried it (custom install without the startup script) but got a
'There were errors, try reinstalling' message. I's broken my old
version
dyld: /usr/bin/tor can't open library
Hi,
can anyone tell me how to uninstall the Tor startup script to prevent
it running Tor as a background service in OSX 10.3.9 please? An
unsuccessful attempt to upgrade has left me with this enabled.
Thanks.
downie
FYI when I was running a relay (not an exit node) I was blocked
(dynamically) from one site at least, presumably using the list at
Moria. Unfair.
GD
On 1 Dec 2008, at 06:03, Karsten N. wrote:
Hi gregery,
torproject.org supports two solution, to help webmasters to protect
theire service for
Hi,
two questions:
I renamed (with 'mv') the file I was sending Tor logs to whilst Tor was
running.
I actually moved it to a different directory.
The log data kept being written to that file. How?
Secondly, does sending a USR2 signal to Tor 0.2.0.31 (r16744) switch on
debug level logging as
Oh yes, restarting does break the link, I just wondered how the link
persisted after a name change. Perhaps this is a normal feature of OSX,
I'm no expert.
On 17 Nov 2008, at 19:06, zmj wrote:
for the first question:
maybe you should restart Tor
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Geoff Down
Thank you very much for the comprehensive replies.
GD
On 17 Nov 2008, at 20:05, Seth David Schoen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I renamed (with 'mv') the file I was sending Tor logs to whilst Tor
was
running.
I actually moved it to a different directory.
The log data kept being
Crashed again after only 2 hours:
This was about 20 minutes beforehand,
%CPU %MEM VSZRSS TT STAT STARTED TIME
0.0 1.639784 10400 ?? S 4:03AM 1:32.40
Nov 11 04:03:06.129 [Notice] Tor v0.2.0.31 (r16744). This is
experimental software. Do not rely on it for strong
This is new in the last day or so:
'Nov 10 16:24:16.973 [Notice] This version of Tor (0.2.0.31) is newer
than any recommended version in its series, according to the directory
authorities. Recommended versions are:
0.1.2.17,0.1.2.18,0.1.2.19,0.2.0.26-rc,0.2.0.27-rc,0.2.0.28-rc,0.2.1.1-
I found the keys, they're in ~/.tor/keys .
The dynamic IP problem persists.
GD
Begin forwarded message:
From: Geoff Down [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 4 November 2008 04:53:21 GMT
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Problem with dynamic IP
Reply-To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Hi,
the Tor FAQs mentions
As long as you disable UPnP afterwards to protect your router from
drive-by attacks.
http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-with-upnp-universal-plug-and-
play/
GD
On 7 Nov 2008, at 13:52, CyberRax wrote:
What version are you using? Atleast 0.1.9 on Windows does have UPnP
support, the
My PC crashed overnight a couple of times now with a relay running - is
this the same thing?
OSX 10.3.9 Vidalia 0.1.9 Tor 0.2.0.31 r16744
GD
On 7 Nov 2008, at 18:25, Martin Hodge wrote:
Same at IdentityHog. Number of TCP connections steadily increased to
~10k and then the server crashed. I
with my dynamic IP (I posted previously under thread
'Problem with dynamic IP').
Thanks,
GD
On 7 Nov 2008, at 19:51, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 07:52:06PM +0100, Olaf Selke wrote:
Geoff Down wrote:
My PC crashed overnight a couple of times now with a relay running
Seems to be working now - with ORListenAddress 0.0.0.0:9001 .
Thanks to those who actually tried to help with suggestions, correct or
otherwise.
GD
On 2 Nov 2008, at 06:52, Jonathan Addington wrote:
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:39 AM, Geoff Down [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm not mirroring
be. I have software to prevent outgoing connections, but no
software firewall to prevent incoming ones as far as I know - the
router is supposed to handle that.
GD
On 2 Nov 2008, at 05:30, Jonathan Addington wrote:
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Geoff Down [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
thanks
On 10 Oct 2008, at 03:40, Scott Bennett wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:23:48 +0100 Geoff Down
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Interestingly, I had about 6 single nodes showing on the Vidalia
network map yesterday, whilst my traffic was going via a normal 3-node
circuit and another 3-node
On 10 Oct 2008, at 10:00, Erilenz wrote:
I'm sure a 30 second google would have been
sufficient,
Actually Google returns four result, all of which have the correct
email address obliterated to prevent spamming ;) .
We're all capable of making incorrect assumptions.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
On 10 Oct 2008, at 19:27, Scott Bennett wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:29:39 +0100 Geoff Down
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 10 Oct 2008, at 10:00, Erilenz wrote:
I'm sure a 30 second google would have been
sufficient,
Actually Google returns
On 10 Oct 2008, at 07:25, Geoff Down wrote:
On 10 Oct 2008, at 03:40, Scott Bennett wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:23:48 +0100 Geoff Down
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Interestingly, I had about 6 single nodes showing on the Vidalia
network map yesterday, whilst my traffic was going via
On 10 Oct 2008, at 20:36, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 08:21:54PM +0100, Geoff Down wrote:
They weren't my usual entry nodes, no. It's a mystery.
It's just happened again - 12 single nodes as well as my 3 normal
entry
nodes and their circuits.
Is there some level
It would never have occurred to me to check the headers either, so
perhaps you are being too hard on them.
GD
On 9 Oct 2008, at 13:24, sigi wrote:
Hi John,
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 04:15:35AM -0700, John Mosgrove wrote:
unsubscribe me.
Please write your Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
BTW, Hotmail users with Macs can't reliably access email headers at
all, and yes that is stupid of Hotmail but they don't care.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Geoff Down [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 9 October 2008 19:08:35 BST
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Re: unsubscribe
Reply-To: or-talk
Is there an echo in here?
Is there an echo in here?
On 4 Sep 2008, at 23:46, Kyle Williams wrote:
I've also noticed that while using the incognito feature, I was able
to see my history from a regular browser window.
Example:
If I were to visit www.microsoft.com in a regular window, opened a
Thanks, I've attached a POC file.
GD
On 7 Jul 2008, at 00:46, Mike Perry wrote:
Thus spake Geoff Down ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
This bug has been closed, but I was actually reporting it purely for
the fact that it throws an uncaught exception error - I assume you
don't want to fill up the Error
This bug has been closed, but I was actually reporting it purely for
the fact that it throws an uncaught exception error - I assume you
don't want to fill up the Error Console with unnecessary alerts ;)
I'm glad local file blocking is not mandatory - I use a local
Javascript utility whilst
Presumably any problems could be avoided by changing the pseudo-tld to
something really obscene...
On 28 Jun 2008, at 12:30, Dawney Smith wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Regarding icann's announcement on Thursday about the opening up of
TLD's
detailed at this
I like it when they peel their layers off reeeally slowly - makes my
eyes water just thinking about it ;)
On 28 Jun 2008, at 13:51, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
.onionporn?
SCNR
Alex.
On 26 Jun 2008, at 10:47, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
Don't take the bait. I bet those weirdos who put that information up
the
Web are just playing with their wieners, drooling over your disgust.
Not Wieners, Berliners (wrong country,wrong type of food) :-P
The owner of one of the exit nodes has replied to tell me that OpenDNS
has phish-filtering on by default but that it is now turned off on
that node.
Thanks to them and to all who helped me out.
GD
On 10 Jun 2008, at 03:31, downie wrote:
I've done as suggested by OtherGeoff and emailed the
Hi,
I work in antiphishing, and use Tor to access some phish sites.
Today I got an OpenDNS Phish Warning page instead of the phish I was
trying to see. The site was visible with Tor switched off.
Is there a policy regarding content filtering at exit nodes?
I recorded the 'Connections' data at
Thanks for the feedback,
the Connections info at the time was
charlesbabbage,minotor,plotin
schatten,dieter,Lifuka
charlesbabbage,gizmo,mxr
ixxosdiwlfkyqz,SEC,Webdvdr
charlesbabbage,RMLAnonSrv2,kyirong
How do I tell from this which was the exit node ?
The page
72 matches
Mail list logo
