My plan goes like this .
1.) Build a barebones SIP client based on SofiaSip.
2.) Support only codec2 ( audio codec )
3.) No encryption is implemented by the SIP client ( like ZRTP etc ) as the
hidden service takes care of that.
4.) Each SIP client will be a hidden service , using authentication
Srry forgot to add . My idea is to create a Voip client optimised for TOR ,
to build a voip client with tor in mind and not getting a client to work
with tor.
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:00 PM, xhdhx johncalis...@gmail.com wrote:
My plan goes like this .
1.) Build a barebones SIP client
Hi,
7v5w7go9ub0o wrote (20 Dec 2010 02:52:28 GMT) :
How would I use the Tor wiki
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki?
I guess you'll want to register, login, and create a new subpage to
the TorifyHOWTO [1] one, linked there just like e.g. the page
dedicated to instant messaging [2].
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:58 AM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
From reading on OnionCat , the clients are essentially hidden services
once a connection is made it is bidirectional.
No, OC is just a daemon shuffling data back and forth across a
Tor HiddenServicePort. Tor provides a
From reading on OnionCat , the clients are essentially hidden services , and
once a connection is made it is bidirectional. If A initiates a connection
to B , A can be sure he/she is talking to B but the opposite isnt true .So
if B has to sure he/she is indeed talking to A , he/she has to initiate
On 12/18/10 12:25, intrigeri wrote:
7v5w7go9ub0o wrote (18 Dec 2010 16:45:06 GMT) :
Did you do any testing with SIP clients - e.g. SIP Communicator
and/or SFLphone? I ask because each of these seem to be very
active, and also offer ZRTP.
I did not. Please let me know any testing results
During preliminary testing we purely relied on communicating the
hidden services names (that map to OnionCat IPv6 addresses) in a
properly authenticated manner.
OnionCat has no authentication between it and and the node it is
running on and it's peers. It's somehwat possible though. There
were
I figured the lgical thing to add to torchat would be voip .Is there any
move to that end , can anyone give me pointers as to probable protocols ,
packages that can be ported to torchat .Or how abt getting ekiga to do the
same along with zrtp .???
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 4:55 AM, xhdhx johncalis...@gmail.com wrote:
I figured the lgical thing to add to torchat would be voip .Is there any
move to that end , can anyone give me pointers as to probable protocols ,
packages that can be ported to torchat .Or how abt getting ekiga to do the
Hi,
Gregory Maxwell wrote (18 Dec 2010 11:08:39 GMT) :
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 4:55 AM, xhdhx johncalis...@gmail.com wrote:
I figured the lgical thing to add to torchat would be voip .Is
there any move to that end , can anyone give me pointers as to
probable protocols , packages that can
Im quite ignorant abt onioncat . How was user authentication done in the
onioncat+mumble combination ??
Reading on mumble says its been optimised for low latency , does that
explain the lag ? Mumble has a client / server architecture so was the
server run as a hidden service the clients just
Hi,
xhdhx wrote (18 Dec 2010 15:25:01 GMT) :
Im quite ignorant abt onioncat.
It is worth reading about. It makes easy some things that would
otherwise be pretty hard.
How was user authentication done in the onioncat+mumble
combination ??
During preliminary testing we purely relied on
If u guys hav all the pieces of the puzzle togather then y not put it out in
a simple package :-). Also Id like to kno if ther are/were plans to put the
hidden service descriptors into a DHT .
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 9:17 PM, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote:
Hi,
xhdhx wrote (18 Dec
7v5w7go9ub0o wrote (18 Dec 2010 16:45:06 GMT) :
Did you do any testing with SIP clients - e.g. SIP Communicator
and/or SFLphone? I ask because each of these seem to be very active,
and also offer ZRTP.
I did not. Please let me know any testing results about such matters.
The Tor wiki is
Hi,
xhdhx wrote (18 Dec 2010 16:13:59 GMT) :
If u guys hav all the pieces of the puzzle togather then y not put
it out in a simple package :-).
The preliminary testing I mentioned is quite different from having
all the pieces of the puzzle together; I am rather speaking of
managing to
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 11:03 PM, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote:
Hi,
xhdhx wrote (18 Dec 2010 16:13:59 GMT) :
If u guys hav all the pieces of the puzzle togather then y not put
it out in a simple package :-).
The preliminary testing I mentioned is quite different from having
16 matches
Mail list logo
