thus Paul Menzel spake:
Dear Thomas,
Am Mittwoch, den 13.10.2010, 10:31 -0400 schrieb Thomas S. Benjamin:
Is your relay running on a virtual machine (V-colo)?
Yes, the relay is running on a virtual machine.
If so, check your user beancounters, they may show you which resources
are
Am Donnerstag, den 14.10.2010, 08:32 +0200 schrieb Timo Schoeler:
thus Paul Menzel spake:
Am Mittwoch, den 13.10.2010, 10:31 -0400 schrieb Thomas S. Benjamin:
Is your relay running on a virtual machine (V-colo)?
Yes, the relay is running on a virtual machine.
If so, check your
Dear Tor folks,
I am still seeing the same problem [1]. In April it used the whole limit
of 1 TB and hibernated after the limit was reached, but afterward it
only came back to around 100 GB per month.
Fast IT is not limiting the bandwidth in any way. I tested that. CPU and
memory are not
Not sure, but mine goes up and down all the time. I am not on a
allocation or accounting like you, but I check several times a day
generally, but at least once a day the bandwidth usage is different
than before.
It may still be re-balancing, but I also notice that the mode nodes
that are running,
Paul,
Is your relay running on a virtual machine (V-colo)?
If so, check your user beancounters, they may show you which resources
are being exhausted. Also, do you find any messages in your log?
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Paul Menzel
paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Dear Tor
Dear Thomas,
Am Mittwoch, den 13.10.2010, 10:31 -0400 schrieb Thomas S. Benjamin:
Is your relay running on a virtual machine (V-colo)?
Yes, the relay is running on a virtual machine.
If so, check your user beancounters, they may show you which resources
are being exhausted.
Xen is used.
Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2010, 13:57 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Am Freitag, den 19.03.2010, 22:08 -0400 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:43:37PM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote 1.0K bytes in 37 lines about:
: I setup a tor relay by just setting
:
On 04/17/2010 07:58 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
Since April 13th traffic increased quite a lot [1]. So it looks like it
just took longer to get my exit node propagated to the network.
It appears to have been in the network, not just utilized to the
fullest. We've been trying new things to rebalance
Am Freitag, den 19.03.2010, 22:08 -0400 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:43:37PM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote 1.0K bytes in 37 lines about:
: I setup a tor relay by just setting
: orport, dirport, and nickname and letting it run. It's
although I think it was confirmed in the whole thread that the full
bandwidth is not used at all.
I'm sorry that my point wasn't made clearly enough. IIRC, you were
wondering why the consensus values didn't match what you were seeing your
router do. (You've deleted the pertinent portion
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:40 -0500 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
[…]
I setup a tor relay by just setting
orport, dirport, and nickname and letting it run. It's 0.2.2.9-alpha.
We'll see what happens.
Do you have any results yet?
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:43:37PM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote 1.0K bytes in 37 lines about:
: I setup a tor relay by just setting
: orport, dirport, and nickname and letting it run. It's 0.2.2.9-alpha.
: We'll see what happens.
:
: Do you have any results yet?
Yes, the
Am Freitag, den 12.03.2010, 11:40 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 14:01 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:40 -0500 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:21:29AM +0100,
paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote 1.6K bytes
: person was paying for 10 mbps and was only
getting ( showing ) less than 5mps after going thru the router.
I suspect that if your full bandwidth was being used, your system
would possibly freeze cause of a burst of speed, etc., there would be
no more room for more bandwidth. IMO, i don't think one
Paul Menzel wrote:
It is a virtual machine ...
Is it safe to say, that it is a client problem that they do not use my
server?
1. On vservers there are many resource limits. Please check: 'cat
/proc/user_beancounters'.
2. Have you read 'http://www.webtropia.com/home/faq.html?article=366'? I
Am Dienstag, den 16.03.2010, 18:51 +0100 schrieb Gitano:
Paul Menzel wrote:
It is a virtual machine ...
Is it safe to say, that it is a client problem that they do not use my
server?
1. On vservers there are many resource limits. Please check: 'cat
/proc/user_beancounters'.
Xen is
the same and maybe
even lower. I also use tools like `nload` to verify the network load.
You can also see bandwidth graphs at [2].
I am a little confused why you are responding nitpicking at the values I
give although I think it was confirmed in the whole thread that the full
bandwidth is not used
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 14:01 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:40 -0500 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:21:29AM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote 1.6K bytes in 52 lines about:
: I now increased the RAM too and restarted
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:40:29 +0100 Paul Menzel
paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 14:01 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:=20
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:40 -0500 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:21:29AM +0100,
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:40 -0500 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:21:29AM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote 1.6K bytes in 52 lines about:
: I now increased the RAM too and restarted the server to no avail. It is
: still below 100 KB/s.
What is
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:21:29AM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote 1.6K bytes in 52 lines about:
: I now increased the RAM too and restarted the server to no avail. It is
: still below 100 KB/s.
What is the network configuration? I setup a tor relay by just setting
orport,
I now increased the RAM too and restarted the server to no avail. It is
still below 100 KB/s.
Am Sonntag, den 07.03.2010, 12:16 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 23:54 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 10:17 -0500 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
On
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 02:36 -0800 schrieb Paul Campbell:
From: Marcin Kowalczyk mar...@kowalczyk-online.com
Sent: Sat, March 6, 2010 7:56:39 AM
Looking at `DataDirectory/state` directly I cannot figure out how to
interpret the values. Maybe I need tot enable bandwidth
Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 23:54 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 10:17 -0500 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:32:59AM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote 1.4K bytes in 39 lines about:
: What did you configure for your bandwidth
Unfortunately the state doesn't provide a complete bandwidth history - if
you check on line 1168 of src/or/rephist.c you'll see:
/** How many bandwidth usage intervals do we remember? (derived) */
#define NUM_TOTALS (NUM_SECS_BW_SUM_IS_VALID/NUM_SECS_BW_SUM_INTERVAL)
This is used later when
Looking at `DataDirectory/state` directly I cannot figure out how to
interpret the values. Maybe I need tot enable bandwidth accounting.
The values for BWHistoryReadValues and BWHistoryWriteValues are
sent/received bytes in 15 minutes.
So VALUE/1024/15/60 shows you your actual kb/s throughput
- Original Message
From: Marcin Kowalczyk mar...@kowalczyk-online.com
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Sent: Sat, March 6, 2010 7:56:39 AM
Subject: Re: Full bandwidth is not used.
Looking at `DataDirectory/state` directly I cannot figure out how to
interpret the values. Maybe I need
I guess arm is using this or something similar to display the bandwidth
usage of Tor.
Nope, arm just gives a running total of the BW events (ie, if you restart
arm the totals will revert to zero). At the moment I'm unaware of a method
of getting the total bandwidth besides tallying it (though
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:32:59AM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote 1.4K bytes in 39 lines about:
: What did you configure for your bandwidth limits or accountingmax?
:
: I did not configure them and so the defaults are used. arm is displaying
: »(cap: 5 MB, burst: 10 MB)«.
Ok,
Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 10:17 -0500 schrieb and...@torproject.org:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:32:59AM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote 1.4K bytes in 39 lines about:
: What did you configure for your bandwidth limits or accountingmax?
:
: I did not configure them and so
Dear Tor folks,
Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 01:01 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 00:45 +0100 schrieb Hannah:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:43:13AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 00:30 +0100 schrieb Hannah:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:26:57AM
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 01:03:22AM +0100, paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote 1.9K bytes in 66 lines about:
: I updated to 0.2.1.23 to no avail. It is up for 12 hours again and
: staying now at 66 KB/s. I also checked that there is still 50 MB free
: memory.
0.2.1.24 is current. What did
Dear SwissTor,
thank you for your answer.
Am Montag, den 01.03.2010, 23:47 +0100 schrieb starslights:
Well i am not sure but look like you must first upgrade your Tor version to
the
last sable minimum 0.2.1.24 who i think will first fix the xx:xx:xx
[WARN] Rejecting insecure DH
Dear Tor folks,
Am Montag, den 01.03.2010, 22:21 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
my Tor server is running for over three days now, but the average
bandwidth usage shown by ARM [1] is only 100 KB/s for uploaded and
downloaded. The usage increased during the first two days but has
stagnated now.
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:26:57AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
[...]
I am out of ideas. It would be really nice, if someone could help,
because otherwise the paid traffic volume will be wasted.
Did you check CPU usage? If your CPU is maxed out, a higher
configured bandwidth allowance won't
Dear Hannah,
Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 00:30 +0100 schrieb Hannah:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:26:57AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
[...]
I am out of ideas. It would be really nice, if someone could help,
because otherwise the paid traffic volume will be wasted.
Did you check CPU usage?
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:43:13AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 00:30 +0100 schrieb Hannah:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:26:57AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
[...]
I am out of ideas. It would be really nice, if someone could help,
because otherwise the paid traffic
Dear Hannah,
Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 00:45 +0100 schrieb Hannah:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:43:13AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2010, 00:30 +0100 schrieb Hannah:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:26:57AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
[...]
I am out of ideas. It would be
Dear Tor folks,
my Tor server is running for over three days now, but the average
bandwidth usage shown by ARM [1] is only 100 KB/s for uploaded and
downloaded. The usage increased during the first two days but has
stagnated now.
I am using the default `/etc/tor/torrc` so bandwidth should be
Hello,
Well i am not sure but look like you must first upgrade your Tor version to the
last sable minimum 0.2.1.24 who i think will first fix the xx:xx:xx
[WARN] Rejecting insecure DH key [0]
xx:xx:xx [WARN] DH key must be at least 2.
I am not 100% sure about that but pretty
40 matches
Mail list logo
