Thus spake ilter yüksel (ilteryuk...@gmail.com):
No, you can only select 'Dual' flagged exit nodes (Exit+Guard) for the
guard position.
Hence it doesn't make sense to have a Wge weight.
You said that only but, depends on your changes for dir-spec, it seems
that we can select dual flagged,
Hello Mike,
Thank you for your concern.
No, you can only select 'Dual' flagged exit nodes (Exit+Guard) for the
guard position.
Hence it doesn't make sense to have a Wge weight.
You said that only but, depends on your changes for dir-spec, it seems
that we can select dual flagged, non-flagged
Thus spake ilter yüksel (ilteryuk...@gmail.com):
Hello Everyone,
Firstly thank all of you so much for your concern. I really appreciate all
effort which for anonymity by open source.
Mike, I'm reading and trying to understand your changes on path and
dir-spec. Could you say please why
Hi Paul,
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:27:56 -0500 Paul Syverson
syver...@itd.nrl.navy.mil wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:30:22AM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:16:28 -0500 Flamsmark flamsm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 14 February 2010 03:15, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:30:22AM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:16:28 -0500 Flamsmark flamsm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 14 February 2010 03:15, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
But one big problem is that you have no guarantee whatsoever that I'm
telling
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:18:33 -0500 Nick Mathewson ni...@freehaven.net
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
[...]
=A0 =A0 I've withheld comment on the above for a long time, mainly becaus=
e
I had intended to include it in a write-up that I still
Thus spake Nick Mathewson (ni...@freehaven.net):
2010/2/12 ilter yüksel ilteryuk...@gmail.com:
For circuits that do not need to be fast, when choosing among multiple
candidates for a path element, we choose randomly. For fast circuits, we
pick a given router as an exit with probability
On 14 February 2010 03:15, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
But one big problem is that you have no guarantee whatsoever that I'm
telling you the truth about my measurements. See for example Kevin
Bauer et al's Low Resource Routing Attacks Against Tor.
Yes, I've understood that
+1. I was kinda floored at the logic behind 'since this attack hasn't
been used in the wild it should be ignored' but... for each their own.
;)
-Damian
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Flamsmark flamsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 February 2010 03:15, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
But
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:16:28 -0500 Flamsmark flamsm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 14 February 2010 03:15, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
But one big problem is that you have no guarantee whatsoever that I'm
telling you the truth about my measurements. See for example Kevin
Bauer et
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:46:18 -0500 Nick Mathewson ni...@freehaven.net
wrote:
2010/2/12 ilter y=FCksel ilteryuk...@gmail.com:
Hello,
For exit router selection path-spec says that;
For circuits that do not need to be fast, when choosing among multiple
candidates for a path element, we
Hello,
For exit router selection path-spec says that;
For circuits that do not need to be fast, when choosing among multiple
candidates for a path element, we choose randomly. For fast circuits, we
pick a given router as an exit with probability proportional to its
bandwidth.
Could anybody
2010/2/12 ilter yüksel ilteryuk...@gmail.com:
Hello,
For exit router selection path-spec says that;
For circuits that do not need to be fast, when choosing among multiple
candidates for a path element, we choose randomly. For fast circuits, we
pick a given router as an exit with probability
13 matches
Mail list logo
